"12 Angry Men" Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages

IntroductionOn a hot summer day, twelve men do their civic duty and begin deliberations over a minority young man's future. The young man is on trial for killing his father. His alibi is that he went to the movies. However, a knife, similar to a knife that he bought, is found protruding from the victim. The witnesses included an old man who claims that he heard the boy say "I'm going to kill you" only seconds before he heard a thud, which he assumes was the father's body falling to the floor. This witness further claims that after he walked to the front door of his apartment and saw the boy running down the staircase. Another witness, a woman, comes forward claiming that by looking out her bedroom window and through the windows of a passing el train, she actually saw the murder happen.All except one juror initially finds the boy guilty. The goal of this motley group of individuals is to come to a unanimous verdict that is beyond a reasonable doubt. This paper will examine these twelve men including their personal prejudices, biases, strengths and challenges.The juror box is filled with twelve men: a selection of people that is diversified from various cultures and different experiences; men with different ages and different motives for their decisions. Juror number one is a high school assistant who is also known as Mr. Foreman. He is an African American male in his early forties. Juror number one leads the group through the deliberations, keeping them on track and ensuring that all participate. Juror number two, a bank teller, is an African American male in his fifties who can be convinced of any opinion, at times voting with the majority. He is quiet and hesitant to speak. Juror number three is a white male who is a very opinionated and intolerant man who forces his viewpoints upon the members. He displays disrespect and even a vengeful demeanor and has his own motives for his votes. Juror number four is a stockbroker and is a well-educated man who also visibly displays integrity, prestige and wealth. This white male in his fifties addresses all of the testimony in a logical and factual manner and provides convincing arguments for his votes. He is respectful of the others and also encourages other members to talk. Juror number five is an African American male who is shown as quiet, insecure, and reserved. He is hestitant to talk, but soon overcomes that hesitation offering his childhood experiences to help the jurors come to a decision concerning the knife that was used. Juror number six is a white American male who is also quiet, but communicates successfully the reasons behind his votes. He is very respectful of the eldest member of the jury, Juror number nine, and going out of his way to ask two people to be more patient. Juror number seven is an Italian American male. He is an extrovert who continuously makes jokes and wants the deliberation to be over with as quickly as possible so he can attend that night's baseball game. He is loud and...

Find Another Essay On "12 Angry Men" - Analysis

12 Angry Men Essay

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men Essay

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

Leadership in 12 Angry Men

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

Personality Types in 12 Angry Men

1349 words - 5 pages Personality is essentially the culmination of the characteristics that make up an individual and that make the individual unique. Personality influences things such as a personas behavior and who that persona interacts with and how the interactions occur. After studying different personalities and reading the play 12 Angry Men I have a better understanding of myself and those around me. This brought me the realization that my close

Live Performance Review: 12 Angry Men

1011 words - 4 pages Review 2.12 Angry MenPlay by Reginald RosePerformed at the Scott Theatre, 7th March 2004A Masterson/Assembly Theatre ProductionDirected by Guy MastersonDirector Guy Masterson's adaptation of Reginald Rose's Pulitzer Prize-winning play, 12 Angry Men, is a surprisingly engaging and high-quality production considering the cast's inexperience; the issues it raises remain topical fifty years after it was written. The play explores the enduring themes

12 angry men movie to book analyisis.

869 words - 3 pages The Fight For A LifeIn the classic story of ?12 Angry Men? originally directed by Sidney Lunnet and then by William Friedkin many characteristics shine through in both films. Both directors chose different actors, camera angles, and lighting, but the essence of the film stays the same. Each film also is greatly influenced by the time period in which they were made. Each time period is reflected in many ways throughout the story of ?12 Angry Men

Group Dynamics in 12 Angry Men

1594 words - 6 pages In the 1957 classic 12 Angry Men, group dynamics are portrayed through a jury deliberation. Group dynamics is concerned with the structure and functioning of groups as well as the different types of roles each character plays. In the film, twelve men are brought together in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The personality conflicts, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to search for the

"12 Angry Men": A case analysis of the classic movie with Henry Fonda from a management perspective

691 words - 3 pages Part 1How would you describe the group task?The group task is to reach an unanimous decision. They have to 'do their duty', they have to reach a consenus decision, so they are forced to have a dialogue with an extreme diverse set of people.Why conflict arises?When they perform a preliminary vote, they find out that one juror think the accused is not guilty 'beyond reasonable doubts'. The other 11 jurors are surprised and then quite angry that HF

The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men

1102 words - 4 pages groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the film's scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young man's fate. During the film, a

Similar Essays

Analysis 12 Angry Men

3337 words - 13 pages writing techniques and provide a specific analysis of the intended meaning and effect on the reader of those choices. There must be some explicit mentioning of the impact of the writer's choices on the audience. What were the intended effects of certain portrayals (see p. 19 of the pack for a list of writing techniques)?On that point, it is a requirement of text response essays that somewhere in the essay you consider the "world" created by the

Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader who fought till the end. The

12 Angry Men Essay 1475 Words

1475 words - 6 pages stated that if he (the boy) went back to get the knife, even if it may have incriminate him, he must have covered up the evidence, rendering him guilty. In conclusion, the movie “Twelve Angry Men” illuminates many social psychology concepts, all of which allow for critical analysis and provide a platform for a better understanding of conformity, persuasion, and fundamental attribution. “Twelve Angry Men” shows there is little difference between

12 Angry Men Essay 550 Words

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a