12 Angry Men: Conflict In The Courtroom

791 words - 4 pages

The jurors had several conflicts in disagreeing with each other and it didn't help that they would shout over one another. The very first conflict is when juror 8 voted not guilty against the 11 guilty votes. The other 11 jurors don't seem to want to hear this man out; they don't want to hear why he has voted not guilty. Some of these men, jurors 3 and 7, just want to get this case over with so they can get on with their lives. They don't think it is imperative enough to look over the evidence and put themselves in the place of the defendant. They get upset with this man and try to get him to vote guilty.
Another conflict is that some of the jurors were hard/hot headed and stubborn. They ...view middle of the document...

Juror 8 always had evidence to back up his reasons, which convinced the others that maybe the boy is innocent.
The ultimate resolution comes after everyone gives their input and puts all of the pieces together. They gain a different perspective which changes their thoughts on everything. After a long day, they eventually all came to a consensus and voted that the boy was not guilty. They found that the reason it took so long to agree with one another is because some of them took it personally while others didn't seem to care.
A great example of a leader was juror 1. At the beginning he took charge in organizing and starting the discussion, and kept stuff in control and running. He didn't shout or disrupt, instead he waited his turn to speak and did so in a civil manner. Another instance of a leader was juror 8. Even when everyone was against his decision and was yelling at him, he didn't give in as he was confident in his reasons why the boy was not guilty. He did not switch sides during the whole debate and could prove his point through numerous examples and scenarios. Juror 3...

Find Another Essay On 12 Angry Men: Conflict in the Courtroom

The Problem of Groupthink in 12 Angry Men

1102 words - 4 pages groups meeting, social roles and expected behavior. This notion is exemplified during the movie, "12 Angry Men". The purpose of this essay is to examine the movie content to display the groupthink symptoms in place. Groupthink consists of eight major factors that occur during the film's scenes, as the twelve men debate a premeditated murder court case. All of the factors continue to rise as the jury discusses the young man's fate. During the film, a

12 Angry Men Essay

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

Differing Opinions in 12 Angry Men

731 words - 3 pages This video is about a group of 12 different men who are in a jury to determine whether or not a boy is guilty of murder. Even though before each of these jurors listened to how the case was explained, they still each had their own opinions on how it actually happened. When they began juror number 8 took his stand to say not guilty. This started the conflict between each of the jurors. Everyone wanted to argue that he was definitely guilty

12 Angry Men

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a

12 Angry Men - 909 words

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

Personality Types in 12 Angry Men

1349 words - 5 pages judging someone without first knowing the person. The clashing of the different personalities of jurors proved to be a major source of the conflict in the play. Even though the jurors in the play 12 angry men with their different personalities and viewpoints had many quarrels throughout the trial, they ended coming together and agreeing to acquit the boy of his crimes. This shows that even though our individual personalities and those of others

12 Angry Men - 1475 words

1475 words - 6 pages with fellow classmates until we were instructed to stop. We were then asked to guess how long the conversations were, as each student answered, the range of numbers became smaller as more students gave lower numbers. Many students conformed because they didn’t want to appear as an outlier and wanted to fit in with the rest of class. An example of normative influence in “Twelve Angry Men” takes place when the jurors take their first vote, most of

12 Angry Men - 1445 words

1445 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt. Juror number ten is an African American ex-Muslim male who is an angry racist man who is also suffering from the flu. He is inconsiderate of the other men and continuously shows his biases and disrespect. He attempts to lead the others, but ultimately fails. Juror number eleven is an immigrant to America and speaks about justice because he has seen it firsthand. Juror number twelve is a white male. He is advertiser and constantly

Group Dynamics in 12 Angry Men

1594 words - 6 pages In the 1957 classic 12 Angry Men, group dynamics are portrayed through a jury deliberation. Group dynamics is concerned with the structure and functioning of groups as well as the different types of roles each character plays. In the film, twelve men are brought together in a room to decide whether a boy is guilty of killing his father. The personality conflicts, the joint effort and the functioning of several minds together to search for the

Similar Essays

Leadership In 12 Angry Men Essay

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

Ignorance In 12 Angry Men Essay

706 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually

Descriptions Of The Character In The 12 Angry Men

897 words - 4 pages . Juror #11- He is a watchmaker. He always wondered why the boy came back to the house when he killed his dad. He votes not guilty. He gets made at juror #7 saying he is not man enough to explain his reasoning’s. He is very observant. Juror #12- He is in the advertisement business. He suggests that everyone explains what they think of the boy. He always switches back and forth with the people that have the better agreements. But at the end he votes not guilty and he doesn’t swath back.

12 Angry Men: The Importance Of Personality In Negotiation

1191 words - 5 pages : Descriptions for self-discovery. Huntington Beach, CA: Telos Publications. Budjac Corvette, B. A. (2007). Conflict management: A practical guide to developing negotiation strategies. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Education. Flouri, E. & Fitsakis, Y. (October, 2007). Minority matters: 12 angry men as a case study of a successful negotiation against the odds. Negotiation Journal. doi: 10.1111/j.1571-9979.2007.00156.x Johnson, R. A