This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

12 Angry Men Movie To Book Analyisis.

869 words - 3 pages

The Fight For A LifeIn the classic story of ?12 Angry Men? originally directed by Sidney Lunnet and then by William Friedkin many characteristics shine through in both films. Both directors chose different actors, camera angles, and lighting, but the essence of the film stays the same. Each film also is greatly influenced by the time period in which they were made. Each time period is reflected in many ways throughout the story of ?12 Angry Men?, the same deep message can be pulled from each version due to the vast similarities and differences in each.The action in this play is that of a tense and tight because of the seriousness of the case at hand. Sidney Lument uses the tense environment in the play to make the movie seem as realistic as possible. The tension also plagues the members of the jury. The jury comes from many different life styles. The wealthier of the jurors degrade and put down the neighborhood from which a few jurors lived in which causes the tension to only rise. These scenes of conflict raise the intensity of the movie and grab the viewer?s attention, and while the audience is pulled in the many little important details are reviled. Sidney Lument adds more scenes in his portrayal. The bathroom scene, one of the added scenes, is where two jurors discuss the verdict away from the loud conference room, where much of the commotion is going on. William Friedkin uses a little different od of action; he tones those scenes down a little, but makes them more frequent as an attempt to keep viewers attention longer. The action scenes are what create the tense atmosphere where the debates begin and where they end.The variation of camera angles and of quality angles provides the viewers with something more to devote their attention to. Sidney Lument uses this technique generously throughout the movies because it enhances the effect of what characters are saying. When a camera zooms in on an actor?s face to draw attention away for the other actors and to focus on the speaker you can?t help, but be pulled into what his words are saying. William Friedkin uses this technique but he allows another actor in the camera view that agrees with the speaker, making the speakers words have more meaning. Both directors use this technique to force major ideas and points that he wants to make clear. This effect greatly enhances the...

Find Another Essay On 12 angry men movie to book analyisis.

12 Angry Men Essay

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men Essay

1475 words - 6 pages stated that if he (the boy) went back to get the knife, even if it may have incriminate him, he must have covered up the evidence, rendering him guilty. In conclusion, the movie “Twelve Angry Men” illuminates many social psychology concepts, all of which allow for critical analysis and provide a platform for a better understanding of conformity, persuasion, and fundamental attribution. “Twelve Angry Men” shows there is little difference between

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

12 Angry Men

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a

"12 angry men."

721 words - 3 pages that they really need to stop and think logicly about the facts in the case. The black and white film is appropriate to issues of right and wrong, a murder trial, and the death penalty. The camera work, focusing on the jurors' faces and the attitudes they reveal, and small clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors create a large canvas of twelve angry men who will decide whether the accused will live or die. Small "sub-scenes" within the

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt. Juror number ten is an African American ex-Muslim male who is an angry racist man who is also suffering from the flu. He is inconsiderate of the other men and continuously shows his biases and disrespect. He attempts to lead the others, but ultimately fails. Juror number eleven is an immigrant to America and speaks about justice because he has seen it firsthand. Juror number twelve is a white male. He is advertiser and constantly

Analysis 12 angry men

3337 words - 13 pages WHY (meanings and audience effect). It's better to use fewer examples and analyse them well, than to give us a shopping list of every example in the text that proves your point.In Year 12 essays, quotes are less important than writing devices and features.You can use quotes anywhere in an essay but also ensure you concentrate on the various ways characters and events are presented. Obviously, metalanguage typical of both fiction and non-fiction

Summary of 12 Angry Men

780 words - 4 pages This report is on a movie called, “12 Angry Men.” The movie is about 12 men that are the jury for a case where a young man is being accused of killing his father. A major conflict that is very obvious is the disagreement on whether the young boy was guilty or innocent. After court when all of the men sat down to begin their discussion Courtney B. Vance (#1) Took charge and respectfully was now the leader. He asked what everyone’s votes were

Leadership in 12 Angry Men

1335 words - 5 pages shows the first quality of leadership vision. Vision can be defined as the leaders ability to know what is needed and how what is needed can be achieved (book). In the case of 12 Angry Men, Henry Fonda has a vision that he and the other jurors have the responsibility to consider the facts in the case and entertain the possibility that the young man may had not killed his father. An example of his vision can be found in his statement that “We're not

Analysis of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages right from wrong, like ethics. Many people in the world exaggerate so they can dress-up their story to sound good and make it almost believable when they are lying. This play has showed me many things to remember for when I’m in the same situation. I enjoyed reading this play but seeing it live was awesome. The live play was nothing like the book. I would always recommend 12 Angry Men as one of the greatest plays everyone must see or read.

Film Analysis: 12 Angry Men

1060 words - 5 pages In the film 12 angry men, 12 jurors are put in a room to discuss a first degree murder case. Each one has a very different characteristic than the next, but each contribute to the stories plot line equally. Each juror can be classified as the average “every day” person; the silent but analytical, the loud and stubborn or the mediator. The one juror that is more like myself is Juror #11. I find myself to be most like him because he is unbiased

Similar Essays

Characters From The Movie, 12 Angry Men

917 words - 4 pages Foreman #1: He was an assistant coach for a football team outside of the of the jury room, he was in charge of keeping everybody in focused on the task at hand. At the beginning of the movie he was persistent on voting guilty, but at the end he changes his vote to not guilty after hearing all of the evidence. Juror #2: This man didn’t talk as much he was very shy and he got a little bit into the discussion of this conflict. After the

12 Angry Men Essay 909 Words

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men Essay 1167 Words

1167 words - 5 pages In the movie "Twelve angry men" an eighteen year old is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all the jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not. The man who does not believe that the boy is guilty explains his views to the rest of the jurors and is ridiculed by the rest of the jurors. An old man later sees where

12 Angry Men Essay 1445 Words

1445 words - 6 pages from, to just who someone is related to or friends with. “Prejudice always complicates the truth.” – Henry Fonda. There were several examples of prejudice in the movie 12 Angry Men. A perfect example is a statement that was made by Juror # 10 “I don't mind telling you this, mister. We don't owe him a thing. He got a fair trial, didn't he? What do you think that trial cost? He's lucky he got it. You know what I mean? Now look, we're all grown-ups