This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

5(B): How Far Were The Roles Of Bismarck And Cavour Decisive In The Unification Of Germany And Italy?

2071 words - 8 pages

When the Tsarist regime in Russia was overthrown and the Bolshevik party under Lenin ruledas a single party government, it was claimed by many that a Marxist regime had beenestablished. Many within the Bolshevik party were firm believers in the Marxist theory andthought that the Soviet state would agree with Marx's ideas. There are some modernhistorians who agree with this view, embracing the ideas of equality and fraternity andbelieving that the Soviet state was the living embodiment of these beliefs. There are alsothose who see that the Soviet state was something quite different from what Marx and indeedLenin had intended it to be. To find out whether the Soviet state defied Marxist theory or not,is hardly a simple task of comparing the elements of the Soviet state with that of an idealMarxist state. One must look at how the regime arose, and in what circumstances, howpopular it was, and whether it was an inevitable manifestation. It is clear that the chiefcoordinator of the revolution and founder of the movement, Vladimir Illyich Lenin died earlyon in the regime. Therefore the change of rulers must be looked at closely to see whetherthere were any major changes or internal disputes, which may cast doubt on the direction andbeliefs of the party. It is clear, therefore that to understand and assess whether the Soviet statedefied Marxist theory or not, one has to look at a number of features and assess theirimportance. Perhaps also, it is worth considering how important Marxism is as an ideology,that is to say, was it bound to fail? Has it ever succeeded in other regimes? If not then whynot? These are the issues that I will attempt to deal with in this essay.The revolution of 1917 can clearly be seen as something, which was inevitable inRussian history. However to simply say that it was a Marxist revolution of the working classagainst the wealthy would be wrong. As Figes and Kolonitskii put it, "there were too manyother self-identities which could not be simply subsumed under class". By this, they meanthat other divisions such as those between rival towns and cultures appeared far moreimportant. These people were revolting against a number of things such as the aristocracywith its embarrassments such as the Russo-Japanese war, a lack of money and a sense ofpoverty. In no way can the people of Russia be said to be devout Marxists they just wantedchange. This is backed up by the fact that the Bolsheviks did not gain power straight away,they still had to fight against two other major forces, the whites (Mensheviks) and the greens.The only reason they gained power was because they had superb leaders who couldorchestrate a successful takeover of power. This disagrees with Marxist theory in one sense.Marx believed the revolution would be a realisation by the "working class" of who they wereand who the enemy was. The revolution would be unstoppable and irresistible due to theoverwhelming majority of the working class. This was not the case because there...

Find Another Essay On 5(b): How far were the roles of Bismarck and Cavour decisive in the unification of Germany and Italy?

Anti-Semitism in Nazi Germany: How Far Were the German People Responsible for the Holocaust?

2175 words - 9 pages associate, and it is the purpose of this investigation to identify just how far the 'ordinary Germans' were to blame for the mass genocide of Hitler's 'final solution.'Some may argue that the strict and authoritative fascist government in Germany influenced the acts of the common people. As most Germans were not directly associated with the Nazi party, it is believed they "were coerced into killing, followed orders blindly, succumbed to peer

Camilo Di Cavour and The Italian Unification

745 words - 3 pages Austria from Northern Italy. Cavour provoked a war against the Austrians and french and Italy went to war and won two consecutive wars in row. Whereas Camilo Di Cavour directed Italian unification, a Junker named Otto Von Bismarck pushed German unification through blood and iron and skillful understanding. As the map of central europe stoods in 1850, Prussia competed with Austria for dominances over a series of small

Coal and Iron and the Unification of Germany in 1871

1803 words - 7 pages Coal and Iron and the Unification of Germany in 1871 In 1862, Bismarck said that ‘the great questions of the day will be settled by blood and iron.’ Although there is undoubtedly some degree of accuracy in this statement, the most important reason for the unification of Germany, which ended ‘the great questions of the day,’ was ‘coal and iron.’ This is a quote from British economist John Maynard Keynes, who argued

Was Bismarck The Key Figure In The Unification Of German?

1483 words - 6 pages . After the failure of the Frankfurt Parliament in 1848, he believed that idealism and talking were not going to result in the unification of Germany and that force had to be used. Bismarck stated that: "The great questions of the day are not decided by speeches and resolutions of majorities - that was the mistake of 1848 and 1849 - but by iron and blood". 7 His "iron and blood" speech was important, as it tried to encourage parliament to take firm

The Process of the Unification and Founding of the German Empire in a European Context: Otto Von Bismarck

2316 words - 9 pages Nordedeutscher Bund. Once the triumph was over Bismarck quickly began discussions for the union of the south German States and the Norddeutscher Bund. In 1871 the Deutsches Reich founding and the much anticipated unification of Germany had happened. Wilhem I was crowned emperor of the Deutsches Reich. Although there were many events leading up to the eventual unification of Germany and founding of the German Empire they appeared to be quite small

The Unification of Germany

1365 words - 5 pages The Unification of Germany           In 1871 the thirty-eight states of what was once the Holy Roman Empire, re-united to become what was known in the early twentieth century as simply, The German Empire, united under the rule of the German Emperor, or Kaiser. There are many factors which led to the unification of the German states; liberalism, nationalism, Otto Von Bismarck, fear of ‘another Napoleon’, the Prussian King William I, and

the unification of germany

1437 words - 6 pages provisions of the Vienna settlement were that Italy had to abandon the reforms and changes that the French had introduced during their occupation of Italy between the years 1796-1815. The French during their rule, reformed the state system by creating a four state system, they changed the political system by reducing the power and privileges of the landed aristocracy and the church and by allowing the middle classes a role in politics by introducing

How important was leadership to the unification of Italy?

971 words - 4 pages The unification of Italy very much depended on the leadership of three important figures. The unification, eventually, was achieved through war and diplomatic alliances. This is due to the shrewd thinking of the Piedmontese prime minister, Camillo di Cavour, and the military achievements of, Giusseppe Garibaldi. However the political themes of the Risorgimento, which were independence, liberty and unification, was introduced in a trinity

Comparison of the Unifications of Italy and Germany

1824 words - 7 pages reason that the two halves of the peninsula joined together.Chapter 3: DifferencesLeadersEach country's unification came about under different leadership. In Germany, there was only one real leader: Otto Von Bismarck. He was almost entirely in charge of the Unification process, and his diplomacy was arguably one of the main reasons for the Unification of Germany. In Italy there were three leaders: Cavour, who was the prime minister of Piedmont

The Unification of Germany Between 1863 and 1871

1155 words - 5 pages roles of Roon, Moltke and the minister of war in building up the Prussian army, were crucial to Bismark's success. The economic development of Prussia also underlay its military power. Prussia was already the most industrialised state in Germany before Bismark came to power, and the zollverein allowed it to gain economic supremacy over other German states. However, there was little popular demand for unification amongst the German nation as a whole and the majority of Germans were uninspired. However, the leaders of Prussia decided it was time for unification and they had the power to achieve this.

How Did the Cold War Affect the Politics of Germany and Italy?

2289 words - 9 pages How did the Cold War affect the politics of Germany and Italy? The Cold War was the most important historic event in the 20th century after the Second World War, from 1945 till 1991 between two most powerful countries in that period – Soviet Union and USA. The Cold War invested a lot in world politics. What is the Cold War? This was a war for dominance in the world. In 1945 the USA was the only one country in the world that had the nuclear

Similar Essays

Analyzing The Unification Of Italy And Germany

1932 words - 8 pages created a balanced settlement among the states which ensured no major conflict until the First World War in 1914" and led to the unification of Italy and Germany. (Morjie, p. 1) (BLOY MARJIE CITE FROM ARTICLE)The Unification of ItalyThe process of the unification of the country of Italy began at the Congress of Vienna. Before the 1860's, Italy was a peninsula that was made up of territories and small kingdoms. The settlements that were agreed upon

Compare And Contrast The Unification Of Germany, Italy, And The United States

2967 words - 12 pages Compare and Contrast the Unification of Germany, Italy, and the United States From the 1790s to 1814 French troops successively conquered and occupied the area that later constituted the German Empire. French domination helped to modernize and consolidate Germany and -- toward the end -- sparked the first upsurge of German nationalism. In different ways the French emperor Napoleon I helped German unification. It was important that he

The Unification Of Germany Was Achieved Through A Policy Of "Blood And Iron". How Did Bismarck Go About Unifying The German States?

1081 words - 4 pages When Bismarck was appointed Prussian chancellor in 1862 by King Wilhelm IV, The democratic attempt of unifying Germany had failed and there was widespread sentiment among the Germans in favour of unification. There were a number of obstacles in Prussia's way of unifying Germany. Among them were foreign powers' interests in Germany, In other words, In order for Bismarck to unify Germany he had to eliminate all the other powers that posed a threat

To What Extent Was Bismarck Responsible For The Unification Of Germany?

1740 words - 7 pages hand goes ahead with his views". Despite the outrage of the Prussian parliament at his arrogance, Bismarck was able to collect enough money to enable him to build up the army, which was essential in helping Germany to become united. Bismarck's forceful approach was also essential in unifying Germany. After the failure of the Frankfurt Parliament in 1848, he believed that idealism and talking were not going to result in the unification of Germany