A Cognitive Model Of New Data On Human Problem Solving

2211 words - 9 pages

A Cognitive Model of New Data on Human Problem Solving

I. Project Description

Cognitive modeling is the creation of models which resemble and explain the way in which humans do things. What makes them so interesting to me is the process though which cognitive scientists go in order to create these models. Cognitive scientists often use a generative theory in creating such models. A generative theory is a theory that explains a set of empirical observations by actually generating them (as opposed to just summarizing them or characterizing them with equations or logic). Thus, a generative theory has to be executable, like a computer program or a "recipe".

The system on which I'm basing my work is named Cascade (VenLehn, Jones & Chi, 1991). Cascade was originally developed to explain the cognitive mechanisms involved in the self-explanation effect (Chi et al., 1989; Fergusson-Hessler & de Jong, 1990; Pirolli & Bielaczyc, 1989). Simplifying a bit, the effect shows that people learn more effectively by studying examples when they are careful to explain to themselves as many steps of the example as they can. Students who do not carefully explain worked out example steps do not perform as well on subsequent problems. Cascade models the potential learning mechanisms that cause this effect.

I now wish to apply the Cascade model to a new problem domain and a new set of psychological data. Originally, Cascade was written to solve problems in Newtonian physics, the domain used in Chi et al.'s study. Since Cascade was first created additional psychological research has been done in other problem domains. Due to the versatility of Cascade, applying the Cascade model to other problem domains would be beneficial. In the fall of 2000 I was able to learn more about the utility of fading examples (Renkl, Atkinson & Maier, 2000). In doing so these scientists shared some of their other research with Randy and have asked us to re-implement Cascade on their other domain which is probability. In doing so I would learn the existing Cascade model well in addition to gaining extensive knowledge about the new problem domain.

The first step in this project is a task analysis (Newell & Simon, 1972). In this step we take the problem in Renkl et al.'s study and figure out exactly what the correct procedure is in solving the problems. This is one of the most critical steps in doing this project as we must correctly identify each piece of the solution of the problem. One of the goals of a good cognitive model is to accurately solve the problem as a real person would solve it; we don't want to just solve it as best we can. The result of the CTA will be a target knowledge base summarizing expert knowledge for this domain.

While working on the task analysis we would also work on prototyping one of the examples. During prototyping we will provide Cascade with the knowledge to solve one of the problems so we can work out the kinks in our knowledge representation.

...

Find Another Essay On A Cognitive Model of New Data on Human Problem Solving

The Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process

1468 words - 6 pages Model and RDSP is an effect of the fact that both processes are analytical and systematic shaped tools used by commanders to find out or implement the best solution when problems or events occur. Furthermore, both APSM and the Rapid Decision and Synchronization Process implemented by commanders are the tools designed to generate new course of action (COA) which in a straight line answers to problem. On the other hand, the Army Solving Problem

The Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process

1832 words - 7 pages concurrently or sequentially. Both systems require a mental process; however, Army problem solving is more analytical, while the RDSP relies on experience and intuition. Staffs at all levels use these processes, nonetheless, Army problem solving provides a framework to help less-experienced officers, while the RDSP is more like a battle drill and staffs must practice it to become more proficient. Both systems have an output. Army problem solving

the Army Problem Solving Model and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process

1986 words - 8 pages systems have an output. Army problem solving will publish guidance, or some type of formal implementing instructions, sometimes in the form of a memorandum of instruction, policy letter, or command directive. On the other hand, the RDSPs only output may be a verbal order or if time allows, a fragmentary order will follow to confirm those orders. Compare and Contrast the National Defense Strategy (NDS) of the United States of America with the

The Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process

1123 words - 4 pages commander. What are the similarities between The Army Problem Solving Model Process and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process? There are several similarities between the two. Leaders combine their experience and intuition with situational awareness to reach the situational understanding. Even though both have a different number of steps to reach a decision, a decision presents itself using a systematic approach. Leaders at all

Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process

1858 words - 7 pages problems or to identify ways to accomplish missions, even though the names are comparatively new. By using these approaches, new personnel can easily integrate into a planning process and have a good understanding of what is going on. Problem solving uses assumptions in order to develop solutions and RDM uses intuition. Intuition is a gut feeling and assumptions are educated guesses, they are essentially the same since both base identified

Army Problem Solving Model and The Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization

1478 words - 6 pages 1. Compare and Contrast the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) with the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process. (C100) If we draw a parallel between the Army Problem Solving Model (Process) and the Rapid Decision Making and Synchronization Process, which are in basic different methods, we can see a lot of similarities and equivalences. In the first place, the most important common feature for the Army Problem Solving Model

Solving A Problem

913 words - 4 pages Have you ever had loud, annoying neighbors? How about neighbors who just don’t seem to care about what anyone else has to say? Did you know that there is a noise ordinance in your community? Noisy neighbors are a community wide problem that more people should pay attention to. Loud neighbors don’t just happen at night, but in all parts of the day. Obviously the average neighbor is going to be bothered by the excessive noise at night

Attributes of Problem Solving

832 words - 4 pages There are several attributes that one must have when it comes to problem solving or approaching problems. For instance: Manner, Neutrality, and Relativism to name a few. However I am going to identify the top three I think is most important attributes to have when going approaching any problem of situation. We will start off with Open-mindedness. The concept of Open mindedness is allowing oneself to accept evidence and different

The Use of the Eight Disciplines on Systematic Problem Solving

595 words - 3 pages the eight disciplines of systematic problem solving. Their theoretical description and practical experience on the use of the 8D method (eight steps) are collected in the following sub-sections. 1D: Identification of Team A problem can be a deviation from requirements / non-compliance, a defect associated with a product, service or operation/system. Once the problem is identified, appoint a team to solve the problem. The 8D team should include

Application and Evaluation of SSM as a Problem Solving

2895 words - 12 pages key limitation is the writer's insufficient experience in organizational and managerial problem solving. Hence the entire analysis will heavily base on the theoretical framework of Checkland's SSM.2. An overview of Checkland's Soft Systems MethodologySSM is a method used as system thinking that regards outcomes of a system as being the product of its interactions rather than as the sum of all parts (Checkland 1999). SSM is a holistic or socio

Solving the Problem of Procrastination

828 words - 4 pages with acute anxiety and hassle, even if I ultimately finish the assignment on time. I am on a journey to find out why people procrastinate and hopefully find attainable solutions to the problem of procrastination, but first I must go outside and play in the snow. People all procrastinate at one time or another. Procrastination is the practice of delaying work on important tasks in favor of less challenging ones. Chronic procrastinating hinders

Similar Essays

The Army Problem Solving Model Essay

917 words - 4 pages identify ways to accomplish missions, even though the names are comparatively new. By using these approaches, new personnel can easily integrate into a planning process and have a good understanding of what is going on. Problem solving uses assumptions in order to develop solutions and rapid decision-making uses intuition. Intuition is a gut feeling and assumptions are educated guesses, they are essentially the same since both base identified

A New Algorithm For Solving Fractured Domain Problem

2722 words - 11 pages , however instead of performing complexification of a multilayer perceptron the RBF is used. Normally, when the network is exposed to a problem it undergoes complexification in a fairly linear manner, that it, an incremental addition of new nodes is observed. This means that the same node is continuously fed with new data. In this way, a node or a set of node is not specialized for a specific set of data. When exposed to fractal do-mains data are

Cognitive Behavioral Therapy And The Model Of Human Occupation

3613 words - 14 pages Therapy frame of reference. Through this comparison, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (CBT) provides an explanation for the acquisition and structure of volitional system. The major theorists under CBT believe that cognitive structures such as beliefs, thinking styles, problem-solving styles, and coping styles as well as the environment are the determinants of behavior (Johnston, 1987). The above structures are represented by a schema, which is developed

The Sara Problem Solving Model Applied Criminology Associates (Aca). (2002). Introduction To Partnership Problem Solving; Problem Solving Workbook

1959 words - 8 pages SARA problem solving model is “analysis”. Analysis is of great importance in the overall model effectiveness. The analysis stage consists of collecting as much information as possible to help identify patterns and create a baseline for the problem solving model. It is important to gather data on the actual problem as well as any underlying causes that may be attributing to the problem. Research is a major part of this step. (ACA, 2002