This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

A Comparison Of Marx And Engels With Mill Regarding Social And Economic Progress

5023 words - 20 pages

A Comparison of Marx and Engels with Mill Regarding Social and Economic Progress

To understand what these two different philosophies tell us about the
nature of social and economic progress it is important to clearly
establish, for the purpose of this essay, a definition of the word
progress. Many philosophers see progress as being a positive,
continuous advancement into the future where, if we do not gain full
scientific and empirical knowledge of our surroundings one day, then
we will at least gain a deeper knowledge of our lives than we at
present possess. If we can therefore have a fuller understanding of
our surroundings there leaves the further question of whether we will
ever reach a stage of progression where we can have complete knowledge
of the more abstract concepts of man’s social and moral
‘perfectibility’. Marx, Engels and Mill attempt to demonstrate how
this ‘perfectibility’ may be reached and/or will be reached with their
contrasting (Marx and Engels vs Mill) views of social and economic
progress. ((The most prominent similarity of these philosophers is the
emphasis that they all put on freedom as being the ultimate goal of
human progress.))

Marx and Engels believe that this ‘perfectibility’ would be reached
through a material process. They reject the views of the young
Hegelians. These new Hegelian followers re-interpreted Hegel’s
idealist philosophy that illustrates history as the progress of the
‘Mind’, thus the spiritual side of the Universe, into history being an
account of human self-consciousness freeing itself from the illusions
that prevent it from achieving self understanding and freedom. Marx
and Engels disagreed with this new interpretation and also disagreed
with the idealist views of Hegel himself. They decided that it is not
the ideas and thoughts of individuals or society as a whole that
drives progress forward but it is the material circumstances under
which people live that determines how they think and act; in their own
words ‘Consciousness does not determine life, but life determines
consciousness’. These two philosophers therefore believe, like
Feurbach (an extremely influential philosopher, especially on Marx)
that philosophy must begin with the finite, material world as this is
the only way that philosophical problems may be overcome; thought does
not precede existence, existence precedes thought. For example in an
article written by Marx titled ‘The Jewish Question’ the racist and
stereotypical nature of the Jew is discussed. The majority of people
at that time, under the Hegelian influence, would see with their
‘idealist eyes’ that the problem of Jews is in religious consciousness
which could be resolved by establishing a new way of thinking. However
Marx clearly points out that the problem does not lie in anything
spiritual but is...

Find Another Essay On A Comparison of Marx and Engels with Mill Regarding Social and Economic Progress

Marx and engels historical materialism Essay

2719 words - 11 pages to produce his goods. The fee to the lord was a portion of these goods. The existence of this system is a historical fact, but what proceeds is yet another argument within this stage against the Marx/Engels belief in concrete stages of history.A new class began to emerge at the same time as the reign of the feudal lords. This new class, this third class, are ?parasites? and ?social sycophants? as Engels describes them. They have no concern with

Carl Marx and Frederick Engels Essay

2506 words - 10 pages not getting the fair share of what society is owed them. We also see the changes described by Marx and Engels in the evolution of the socio-economic structures. From the lowly beginnings of a simple socialist village, to the transformation into Utopia, we can see the definite possibilities of a society where everyone is born into the same social class. Where there is no higher class, or lower class. There are no rich or poor. Everyone would be

Karl Marx and Frederick Engels

1757 words - 7 pages Karl Marx and Frederick Engels Karl Marx and Frederic Engels were two very liberal, politically left, philosophers. This means that they were in favor of a large government that is comprised of the people, and involved in the lives of these people. One may reflect that this does not sound very different from the influence the United States government has on the lives of its citizens, a large providing government that acts on the will of

Karl Marx, Friedrich Engels, and Religion

2523 words - 10 pages Karl Marx (1818-1883) was the most influential revolutionary socialist thinker of the 19th century. Marx’s key interests were in establishing a revolutionary party for the working classes and analysing capitalist society in order to find its strengths and weaknesses and so plan its demise. With his friend and colleague, Friedrich Engels (1820-1895), he created “The Communist Manifesto” in which they described the communist society which would be

Marx and Engels’ Critiques of the Capitalist Societies of Their Time

2418 words - 10 pages . Each social class acted rationally for their best interest instead of caring for the society or as a whole. In addition it becomes more like a struggle to survive for every class and especially to the poor people where they suffer the most. Marx view was that with the division of those two classes will lead to inequality because rich class take advantages of the poor class which they are force to work in order to survive. Marx and Engels were

The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

1012 words - 4 pages The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels The Communist Manifesto, written by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, outlines how a society should be run under communism. The document provides truths to what is wrong with society; what causes these wrongs; how they can be fixed; and how this relates to humans and nature. Marx was a political philosopher of German ancestry. Marx and Engels split the document up into four sections

The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels

1061 words - 4 pages similar organizations in England, called these groups together for a meeting in the winter of 1847. Under Marx's influence this assemblage of working-class parties took the name "The Communist League," discussing their grievances with capitalism and potential methods of response. While most of the delegates to this conference advocated universal brotherhood as a solution to their economic problems, Marx preached the composition of class warfare

Comparing Karl Marx and John Stuart Mill

4526 words - 18 pages the face of a new economic and a new political system. Marx might not have made the best analysis, but he did have a deep understanding of history and the problems in history. He stood at the level of the common people and tried to solve their problems caused by their material desperation. Mill did not stoop to the common people, he looked up into the sky of truth and tried to preserve the march toward truth first embarked on by Plato. Social

India and China: A Comparison of Economic Growth and Development

2154 words - 9 pages after civil war had plagued the nation. The Chinese Communist Party inherited this complicated task when they defeated the Nationalist Party and gained control over Mainland China in 1950. Before the Communist Party could implement any economic reforms they first had to unify a country that had been in turmoil for years.The governments of India and China were each faced with the complicated task of rebuilding their economies during the late 1940's

Individual and State Roles in Communism According to Marx and Engels

1233 words - 5 pages ideas for the role of the state in a Communist society. Marx and Engels listed ten things that are imperative for a communistic society that explicitly referred to the roles of the state. Some of these were, Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes [….] Confiscation of all property of all emigrants and rebels [….] Centralization of credit in the banks of the state, by means of a national bank with

The Comparison of Karl Marx and Matthew Arnold

640 words - 3 pages endeavor to make the moral and social characteristics of individuals prevail. Because culture is a study of perfection, then it is also an 'inward condition of the mind and spirit, not in an outward set of circumstances' (Arnold 23). Arnold states that, 'In thus making sweetness and light to be characters of perfection, culture is of like spirit with poetry...' (25).Matthew Arnold felt that religion was an important aspect of culture. Arnold felt

Similar Essays

A Comparison Of The Economic Philosophies Of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, And Karl Marx

1811 words - 7 pages economists shared within their economic process and their beliefs regarding human nature. The first economist we will discuss is Adam Smith. Before we discuss Smith's views, we will provide a brief description of the setting in which Smith was able to create his assumptions, and formulate his theories. Smith studied Social Philosophy at the University of Glasgow and the University of Oxford, the latter of which he was not as fond of. The primary

Chronological Issues And Their Philosophical Solutions A Comparison Of 3 European Thinkers And Their Writtings: John Locke, Karl Marx And Fredrick Engels, And Niccolo Machiavelli

1059 words - 4 pages Chronological Issues And Their Philosophical SolutionsThroughout history, there have been many philosophers who have looked at their environments, all seeking the remedies to the social, economic, and political problems faced by its people. Among them are Niccolo Machiavelli, John Locke, and Karl Marx and Fredrick Engels. Each of the authors' ideas and writings are influenced by, and reflect, the problems that they faced during their time. This

A Comparison Of The Economic Theories Of Adam Smith And Karl Marx

2467 words - 10 pages capitalism in the first place leads them to construct different frameworks: Marx of the capitalist using the exploitation of labor to accumulate capital and increasing the ratio of constant capital to variable capital, lowering wages, and Smith, with specialization and the division of labor allowing an increase in consumption. Their approaches to and respective arguments about the capitalist system of production have and will continue to shape economic and social policy in societies in every corner of the globe.

Marx And Engels On Social Classes

956 words - 4 pages communism a belief of economic equality through collective ownership and the elimination of private property led by Karl Marx (1818-1883) and Friedrich Engels (1820-1895) (Hunt 707). Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels wrote The Communist Manifesto (1848) to tell the world that by replacing “capitalism and private property with a communist state in which all property is collectively rather than individually owned. (Hunt 708) society as a whole would prosper