A Comparison of the Attitudes Shown in The Man He Killed By Tomas Hardy and in My Last Duchess by Robert Browning
The attitudes shown in the two poems “The Man he Killed” by Tomas
Hardy and “My Last Duchess” Robert by Browning are very different;
where as Hardy creates a modest, baffled character who feels very
guilty, Browning’s Duke is a vain, proud man who has killed his wife
in a premeditated manner. These characteristics are also revealed
through the poet’s use of stanza, structure and language choices.
Both of the poems are about killing In the Man He Killed the solider
feels very guilty for his actions; this is evident when he says;
“I shot him dead because-
Because he was my he was my foe,
Just so – my foe of coarse he was;
That’s clear enough; although.”
His guilt is evident because he is questioning his actions; this is
reinforced by the repetition of the word ‘foe’. Also the use of the
words ‘That’s clear enough…’ where he is trying to reassure himself,
about his actions.
My Last Duchess The duke does not feel guilty for his actions; this is
evident when he says;
“I gave commands;
Then all smiles stopped together.”
His lack of guilt is evident because he is giving commands to someone
to kill his wife; and he is not showing any regret or sadness.
Therefore the two characters feel very differently about the deaths
that they have both been involved in. The attitudes about the deaths
are very different: both men also reveal different attitudes towards
The Duke would kill again if his wife was not perfect and the solider
would kill again only if he came into contact with another enemy.
In My Last Duchess
“Though his fair daughter’s self, as I avowed
At starting, is my object”
Here it is obvious he would kill again because he is saying his next
wife will also be his object. She is an addition to his art
collection and will need to be perfect if she is keep her life.
The protagonist in ‘The man he killed’ would probably kill again if
placed in the sa
In The Man He Killed
“But ranged as...