This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

A Debate Of The Death Penalty

1481 words - 6 pages

The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who has a right to life, and under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. I believe there are no circumstances under which capital punishment is justified. I will proceed to defend my claim that capital punishment is unjustified by arguing a position that killing is wrong because it deprives individuals of valuable futures.
To support my thesis that capital punishment is not justified, I will expand upon an argument made my Don Marquis in his essay “Why Abortion is Immoral” in which he argues that killing is immoral on the grounds that it deprives human beings of a valuable future. My argument is as follows:
1. Killing is wrong because it deprives the victim of his or her future.
2. Death row criminals are in the same moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives.
3. The future of a criminal on death row is just as valuable as the future of a human being not on death row.
4. Any form of capital punishment is a form of killing.
5. Therefore, because killing is wrong, killing by capital punishment is also wrong under every circumstance.

My first premise states that killing is wrong because it deprives the victim of his or her future. Just as Marquis argues that abortion is wrong because it is killing an individual and depriving him or her of a valuable future, I argue that capital punishment is wrong because it too involves killing and depriving an individual of a valuable future. Marquis states, “When I am killed, I am deprived both of what I now value which would have been part of my future personal life, but also what I would come to value” (322). The value of an individual’s future is a subjective term. The value of something, in this case the value of a life, is not determined by external circumstances or the opinions of other people. The outside factors and conditions are irrelevant. Rather, the value is determined by how that person perceives his or her own life and these future experiences. Thus, when someone is killed, he or she is deprived of all the things that were of value and will be of value to him or her in the future. Causing this loss of a valuable future is ultimately what makes killing wrong and immoral because that individual has permanently lost the opportunity to enjoy his or her future experiences which are valuable to him or her.
My second premise states that death row criminals are in the same moral category as other human beings with respect to the moral value of their lives. The only factor which differentiates a criminal from a non-criminal is the fact that the criminal, usually irrefutably, violated community standards and the law to commit a crime. In the case of a criminal on death row, he or she would have had to have committed a serious capital crime to receive the death sentence. Since committing a capital offense is the only reason death row criminals are different from other human...

Find Another Essay On A Debate of the Death Penalty

Abetment/ Retention of Death Penalty: A Debate

4378 words - 18 pages SHOULD INDIA ABOLISH THE DEATH PENALTY?A Debate on Abetment/ Retention of The Death PenaltyLegal MethodsRishi Aneja08D6043II SemesterSchool of Law, Christ UniversityTable Of CasesBachan Singh v. State of Punjab (AIR 1982 SC 1325)Furman v. State of Georgia, (1972) 408 US 239Gregg v. Georgia, (1976) 428 US 153Jagmohan Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR 1973 SC 947Jurek v. Texas, (1976) 428 US 262Kehar Singh v. Delhi Administration, AIR 1988 SC

Death Penalty Debate Essay

1887 words - 8 pages Why is the death penalty still allowed throughout much of the U.S.? The process of prosecuting and convicting an individual is astronomical, and there is great debate as to whether the death penalty actually works as a deterrent. Retribution and biasness have contributed too many that have received this sentence, considering all this, life imprisonment is best for all, realistically, and most effective. The advantages of life imprisonment far

Death Penalty – A Debate over Law and Morality

2305 words - 10 pages been practiced in America for more than 4 centuries and has been a controversial issue for many years. Over time, many states reserved the death penalty solely for murder; although some states abolished the death penalty, there are 32 states that still maintain this contentious punishment. People who are going for or against the abolition of death penalty are making their arguments based on both statistical evidence and their personal perspectives

Constitutionality of the Death Penalty

1792 words - 8 pages would be most unconstitutional. This is a two way street to which neither side of the debate will ever come to a final conclusion, the death penalty when used improperly is definitely a form a cruel and unusual punishment, violating the 8th amendment, yet; capital punishment has been a part of our legal system for many years now and it has served as a form of deterrent that has kept men from possibly committing an awful crime.

Abolishment of the Death Penalty

2800 words - 12 pages The death penalty was reinstated in this nation on January 17, 1977 after a ten year ban following the Furman v. Georgia case. Following this act, torture has turned into one of the biggest controversies in the United States. Currently, there are seventeen states that do not enforce the death penalty while others are continuing to debate legislation on whether or not to make the death penalty illegal. Law makers who advocate the

The Death Penalty: A Just Method of Punishment

2100 words - 8 pages . Controversy has always been present and both sides of the argument have valid points, but the one side always finds an argument to refute the opposition. The issue of banning the death penalty will always be a major debate among society. Citizens will continue to fight for what they believe is right and just, whether it is life in prison without the possibility of parole or being sentenced to death row to wait on their execution date. The death penalty

Cost of the Death Penalty

1185 words - 5 pages Costs and Consequences of the Death Penalty, written by Mark Costanzo, neatly lists reasons for opposition, and abolishment of, the death penalty. Costanzo provides a review of the history of the death penalty, a review of how the death penalty process is working today, questions on whether or not if the death penalty is inhumane and cheaper than life imprisonment. He also questions if the death penalty is fairly applied and the impact, if

A Case in Favor of the Death Penalty

1665 words - 7 pages determining which method is effective between the different punishment models. With this is the debate on the issue of the death penalty as a form of punishment for high-profile crimes. Should the criminal justice system adopt a more lenient approach and abolish the use of the death penalty for capital offenses, or should it embark on a more restorative form of justice? This paper argues for the use of the death penalty in the criminal justice

Benefits of the Death Penalty

1554 words - 6 pages Have you ever thought about if the person next to you is a killer or a rapist? If he is, what would you want from the government if he had killed someone you know? He should receive the death penalty! Murderers and rapists should be punished for the crimes they have committed and should pay the price for their wrongdoing. Having the death penalty in our society is humane; it helps the overcrowding problem and gives relief to the families of

Immorality of the Death Penalty

728 words - 3 pages 1. Introduction A. Attention Getter: Thou shall not kill, only one of the ten commandments that some individuals unfortunately can not seem to uphold. What would the world look like if we did not have an “eye for an eye” mentality? The debate about whether or not capital punishment is ethical or immoral is significant because our country is spending unnecessary amounts on death penalty executions, in which citizens do not know enough about the

The Death Penalty - Overview of the death penalty including history

589 words - 2 pages different views on what constituted the "cruel and unusual punishment" prohibited by the Eighth Amendment. More than 600 death row inmates who had been sentenced to death between 1967 and 1972 had their death sentences lifted as a result of Furman.A big debate concerning the death penalty is determining the Constitutionality of the Death Penalty such as in the particular case, Furman v. Georgia. In Gregg v. Georgia of 1976, the death penalty was

Similar Essays

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

1768 words - 7 pages ) Today, thirty-four states in the United States of America still practice the death penalty as a means of punishment for capital offenses and heinous crimes. The death penalty debate is one that Americans are no strangers to; it has been abolished and repealed numerous times throughout our history. Two of the first influential cases dates back to 1968, US v. Jackson and Witherspoon v. Illinois. In each of these cases, the Supreme Court began

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

1881 words - 8 pages States specifically, the issue has great significance to the bill of rights and the 8th amendment, which prevents cruel and unusual punishment. The death sentence, due to the intense debate on its morality and constitutionality, as well as the many conflicting decisions made about it until this day, still is and will likely remain a very controversial issue in the United States. The death penalty has existed almost as long as civilization itself

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

1300 words - 6 pages The death penalty is a source of capital punishment that is still being used today in many places including the United States. The death penalty is when someone is killed for a crime they've committed. Many states still take part in the death penalty, only eighteen states don't have an enforced death penalty regulation. The death penalty should be considered cruel and unusual punishment, those who have committed a crime should be punished

The Death Penalty Debate Essay

3234 words - 13 pages arrested in Malaysia in 1983. Because of tough Malaysian anti-drug laws, anyone carrying more than 15 grams of heroin is liable for the death penalty. Despite many appeals and public debate, Chambers and Barlow were hanged on the 7th July 1986 in Kuala Lumpur.The second case is that of Eric Edgar Cooke, a Western Australian serial killer and burglar. In jail, Cooke admitted to have committed more than two hundred thefts, five hit-and-run offences