A Discussion Of George Fletcher’s Paradigm Of Reciprocity

1140 words - 5 pages

In this paper I will be discussing George P. Fletcher’s “paradigm of reciprocity”. I will discuss what two issues the paradigm specifies and how they are treated by the paradigm. I will assess how the treatment of the issue is different from that of the wealth maximization approach. I will also look at how the paradigm makes sense of both fault and strict liability. Lastly in this paper I will discuss why I agree with Fletcher’s stance and a criticism one might have for it.
Fletcher’s paradigm of reciprocity is a model that describes when liability for an act is shifted from one party to another – in the case of tort liability from victim to defendant. The paradigm discusses two issues. The first issue is whether or not the victim has a right to recovery from an injury. The outcome of the first issue – whether or not the victim has a right to recovery – is dependent on both the actions of the victim and the danger posed by the defendant at the time of the injury. If the actions of the victim posed as much danger to the defendant as the actions of the defendant posed to the victim then there would be no transference of liability. Both parties would be at fault in this case. However, if the actions of the victim did not pose as much danger to the defendant as the actions of the defendant posed to the victim then liability would be transferred to the defendant. When the danger that each party exhibits on one another is unequal there has to be transference of liability. This leads into the second issue that is discussed by the paradigm.
The second issue is whether or not the defendant has an obligation to reimburse for an injury. The outcome of this second issue depends whether or not it is rational for the defendant to have to pay. The rationality of this decision comes from being able to decide or distinguish if the defendant is the sole perpetrator of the action. If one cannot distinguish whether the defendant is the sole perpetrator compared to others than it is not fair to put the burden of liability on the defendant. These approaches of the paradigm are different from a wealth maximization approach.
The wealth maximization theory is different from the two issues discussed above because it is concerned with maximizing social wealth. The other theories are not concerned with maximizing social wealth. Rather they are concerned with the facts that relevant to the case at hand. The issues brought up by the paradigm determine fault through the guidelines that they set. On the other hand with wealth maximization fault being found is dependent on whether or not wealth was maximized. In this case the “Learned Hand Formula” would be helpful in finding fault. With the “Learned Hand Rule” fault is transferred to the defendant if and only if the costs of precautions that they could have taken was less than the expected cost of damage. In such a case the wealth was not maximized because more money was lost in damages than would have been lost in taking...

Find Another Essay On A Discussion of George Fletcher’s Paradigm of Reciprocity

A Discussion of Legality Essay

1570 words - 6 pages the house to her 4 months before her graduation and Alice gave her “acceptance” by mail approximately 4 months after her graduation. This left Alice with about 8 months to consider the possible deal. Was Ravi’s deadline Alice’s graduation in April or a reasonable time afterwards or was acceptance open until Alice found adequate employment? Other problems stem from the method of acceptance, which came in the form of a letter by mail, rendering

A Brief Discussion of Mythology Essay

594 words - 2 pages A Brief Discussion of MythsAccording to Wikipedia, “mythology” signifies a means of myth telling from a culture and involves the study of myths. OED defines myth as traditional stories that include forces, beings, or creatures with supernatural powers that justifies “a religious belief or ritual, or a natural phenomenon.” Myths were part of all early cultures before the development of writing and reflected the beliefs of

A Discussion of Qualitative Research

1284 words - 6 pages Qualitative Research This will be a discussion of qualitative research. It will define qualitative research, as well as look at the similarities and differences in the quantitative and qualitative research paradigms. Furthermore, this discussion will look into qualitative case study research and phenomenological research, with further contemplation of purposes, methods, and limitations for these two methods. Qualitative research is concerned

A Brief Discussion of Judaism

1251 words - 5 pages evil of them for it. However, I do think it a little silly for them to be waiting for a warrior savior, as the message of God is that of peace. But, if you stop to consider the fact that to the first Jews, Yahweh was a tribal god, something of a warrior God for his people who loosed them from Pharaoh by performing terrible and wondrous deeds, it is understandable.To speak of the hardening of Pharaoh's heart, the discussion that we held in class

Domination to Reciprocity: The Evolution of Popular Culture

1521 words - 6 pages witness a shift in the earlier Romantic emphasis on the fascination and domination of the subordinate cultures [Herder] to a notion of cultural reciprocity between the elite and popular strata of society. The imposition of European culture on Natives during the colonization of the New World entailed not only the desire to dominate/convert supposedly inferior Natives but also an accompanying fascination with their contradictory way of life

Analysis of "The Thematic Paradigm"

1686 words - 7 pages In the article “The Thematic Paradigm” exerted from his book, A Certain Tendency of the Hollywood Cinema, Robert Ray provides a description of the two types of heroes depicted in American film: the outlaw hero and the official hero. Although the outlaw hero is more risky and lonely, he cherishes liberty and sovereignty. The official hero on the other hand, generally poses the role of an average ordinary person, claiming an image of a “civilized

A Discussion of Freedom by Shaw

2093 words - 8 pages FREEDOM George Bernard Shaw "My conscience is the genuine pulpit article, it annoys me to see people comfortable when they ought to be uncomfortable; and I insist on making them think in order to bring them to a conviction of sin." -----Shaw. The above quoted lines show us the uncompromising character of the man who never thought idealistically about literature, that is to say, one who never

criminology - a discussion of gender - criminology - essay

2128 words - 9 pages ‘Fear of crime’ – A Discussion on Gender It is commonly held that the ‘fear of crime’ is gendered. I will explore what gender means, how it affects those in society, and equally, how the society around them reacts in return. The characteristics of both victim and perpetrator can slant the public’s opinion either way, with some women painted as innocent and others tarred as ‘they-had-it-coming’s. This essay highlights the consequences that can

A Discussion on the Abundance of Osmolytes

526 words - 2 pages outer cortex in towards the inner medullary regions of the papilla. Burg et al., 1990 also found a significantly greater distribution of GPC, Betaine and Sorbitol in the inner medulla of rat kidneys compared to the cortex during both diuresis and anti-diuresis. These organic osmolytes in the papilla are used during high osmolality to maintain cell volume without increasing ionic strength.Western blotting technique show there is approximately 39 kDa

A Discussion on Different Types of Ethics

3117 words - 12 pages Ethics is basically concerned with people’s moral obligations to others. This is to mean that ethics is a moral standard or a set of moral standards that guide people on the right and wrong behavior. According to the Josephson Institute of Ethics (), ethics is about how people meet the challenge of doing the right thing when that will cost more than we want to pay. Moral standards can be described as principles having their basis on cultural

The Paradox of Cooperation and Competition in Strategic Alliances - Towards a Multi-paradigm Approach

7012 words - 28 pages AbstractCooperation and competition characterise the interfirm relationships in strategic alliances. This paper proposes a paradox approach to studying cooperation and competition. It explains the paradox perspective and provides an analytic framework for the paradox of cooperation and competition. In the light of the paradoxical nature, it advocates a multi-paradigm approach to cooperative and competitive strategies, which combines strategic

Similar Essays

A Study Of Reciprocity Arousing Potential Essay

2006 words - 8 pages Most traditional upbringings include a few key life lessons. Among these is a sense of paying it forward. There are many different proverbs to describe this occurrence; “Do unto to others as you would have them do unto you,” and “One good turn deserves another,” The idea of reciprocity is such a generalized norm that people often don’t realize that they partake in this behavior. These reciprocal behaviors can often be very simple

A Paradigm Of Stability Essay

1155 words - 5 pages A community may be defined as a feeling of fellowship with others, as a result of sharing common attitudes, interests and goals. Although each and every community divaricates from the next, each holds a common base ground for tradition and standard. It is in fact tradition and standards of behavior that unify a community to implement a sense of stability. After all, stability is the inescapable quality that bonds a community as one. This

The Law Of Reciprocity Essay

3655 words - 15 pages Christmas cards with a note and a photograph to 600 complete strangers. Shortly after he mailed the cards, responses trickled in; he received dozens of cards in reply. It was the Rule of Reciprocity at work. Despite what Warner would think, Clara Vogel, knew she had nothing to lose. Thinking back, making the decision to experiment had been easy for Clara. She had had all Thanksgiving Day while she sat over her turkey pot pie and thumbed

Mormonism: A Paradigm Of An American Faith

2252 words - 10 pages , signed by Abraham Lincoln in 1862. It flatly stated that the practice of bigamy was a federal offense, punishable by a hefty fine. The law outraged the Mormons, and so they largely dismissed it. They believed that the government could not impose restrictions onto church practices, citing that the first amendment protected their right to practice polygamy. However, in 1879, George Reynolds, a Mormon with two wives, was indicted for polygamy, and