This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

A More Responsible Approach To Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1628 words - 7 pages

It’s Time for a More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

The debate about using animals for medical testing has been raging for years. The struggle always seems to be between extremist animal rights activists who believe that animals should never be used for research, and scientists who believe that any use of animals is acceptable. There are a growing number who argue that there must be a reasonable middle ground. I contend that there must be a significant decrease in the number of animals used by humans to further human goals. I will give a historical account of animal use, provide some statistics about animal use, present some arguments against the use of animals and present Singer's view as well as my own. To conclude I will present a new idea that has become important to the animal protection movement, paving the way for more moderate discussion concerning animal welfare.

Animals were used for the study of the life sciences in ancient Greece. To learn about body functions scientists would cut into a live animal to observe the processes that were occurring. Animals have been used for centuries to help researchers understand the various organs of the body and their functions as well as to hone their surgical skills (jhsph). In the 19th century there was a rise in biomedical research and a subsequent rise in the number of animals used in experiments. Then came the birth of the animal rights movement in a large scale. Bentham's question of whether or not animals can suffer became the rallying cry of the animal protection movement at the time. The Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals in Great Britain and in the United States was created in the 19th century as well as the passage of the first anti-cruelty laws in Britain. Animal use skyrocketed again after WWII with developments in the chemical industry, increased government regulati

Millions of animals are used each year for medical research, product testing, and education in the United States. These animals include in decreasing order of frequency: mice, rats, birds, rabbits, guinea pigs, hamsters, "farm animals" such as pigs and sheep, dogs, primates and cats. The most common of these, rats and mice, are not protected under the AWA and no accurate figures are kept on the exact number of these animals that are used regardless of the fact that they make up 85-90% of all animals used (hsus).

The most common arguments against animal use question the morality, necessity, and scientific validity of these studies, that is, whether we have the right to perform such tests, whether we need such tests, and whether these tests provide us with any useful information. The moral aspects of the animal use debate involve the view of animals as sentient beings. It is argued that we have a responsibility toward animals and a moral obligation to not cause them pain or distress (jhsph). Singer argues that...

Find Another Essay On A More Responsible Approach to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

The Cruelty of Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation

1391 words - 6 pages The Cruelty of Animal Testing and the Need for Alternative Methods In his book Inhumane Society: The American Way of Exploiting Animals, Dr. Michael W. Fox estimates that twenty-five to thirty-five million animals are used in the United States each year for laboratory testing and research (58). Research involving tests done on animals is unnecessary and cruel. More humane methods of research need to be employed. Fox states that animal

Animal Experimentation and Research Essay

2622 words - 10 pages Animal Experimentation and Research In the basement of the psychology department here, a poster hangs on the wall; on it is a picture of two white lab rats and a caption that reads, ?They?ve saved more lives than 911.? This poster hangs on the wall of the room where I performed brain surgery on a rat. Many people would be morally opposed to this and any other form of animal research and experimentation and feel that it should be banned

Alternatives to Animal Experimentation

2951 words - 12 pages their own programs to validate alternatives. Although some critics are doubtful that replacement methods will ever be able to take the place of hands-on animal experimentation, the struggle continues for avid animal rights supporters to find alternative testing procedures. The question of whether animals have the right to be protected from such research experiments is a hard one to answer, and has been disputed for many years. The question

Animal Experimentation in Scientific Research

2561 words - 10 pages chemicals in the future. It is only a matter of time until alternative research modes will outnumber and be more successful than animal experimentation. With animal testing currently being the favored means of research for most companies, there are few regulations for this type of research that is meant to regulate the care and use of animals in laboratories. The Animal Welfare Act, AWA, is currently the only federal law in America that manages

We Must Stop Animal Research and Animal Testing

2051 words - 9 pages What if I told you that more than 100 million animals are killed each year due to animal testing? What if I told you that these animals are burned, crippled, abused and poisoned on a regular basis? What if I told you that in order to obtain your favorite shampoo, hand sanitizer, lotion, etc. that innocent animals must be tortured? Throughout history animal research and experimentation has played a key role in scientific benefit

Putting a Stope to Animal Testing

1027 words - 5 pages Have you ever really thought about what happens during animal testing? How the animals are treated, or what tortures they have to face on a day to day basis? More than one-hundred million animals suffer and die every year through animal testing. Ninety-five percent of animals used aren’t even covered under the Animal Welfare Act, which regulates the treatment of the animals that are used for testing. Animal testing is a cruel, inhumane procedure

Medical Schools and Animal Experimentation

2027 words - 8 pages eventually be put down. The animals are tortured just to live in fear and eventually be put down. All of the stress and boredom that they go through causes them to have neurotic behavior. When someone walks by the cages their blood pressure rises and they shake in fear. Animal research/experimentation is a form of animal abuse. There was a video I watched where the people were treating the animals terrible. They were ripping animals off of cages

animal experimentation: pros and cons

1945 words - 8 pages . Technically, they could be wasting a animals life and potentially disabling it for its life. That said it could have a different reaction on the human body and could possibly hurt humans more than the animal. "We are not 70 kg rats" said Thomas Hartung, a professor at John Hopkins university. You need to consider when testing on an animal because you do not want to waste an animal on things that humans want, but not need. Will this effect humans in the

Animal Experimentation Issues and Alternatives

2527 words - 10 pages . Leathal Laws: Animal Testing, Human Health and Environmental Policy. P.11. London and New York: Zed books ltd. Guerrini, A. 2003. Experimenting with Humans and Animals: from Galen to Animals Rights. Baltimore and London: The Johns Hopkins University Press. Orlans, F. 1993. In the name of Science: Issue in responsible Animal Experimentation. Oxford: Oxford University press. Smyth, D. 1978. Alternatives to Animal Experiments. London: Scolar press in

Animal Experimentation Pros and Cons

2364 words - 10 pages The first pro to animal testing is that it has helped us create lifesaving cures and treatments. The California Biomedical Research Association released a statement saying almost every single medical breakthrough has resulted in the direct use of animals in the last 100 years. Can you believe this? Taking out dogs pancreases helped us discover insulin, chimpanzees helped us get a vaccine for Hepatitis B, and even the polio vaccine was tested on

Animal Testing and In Vitro Testing as a Replacement

1032 words - 5 pages % of animals used in testing and research are excluded from the bill. The European Union similarly enacted a bill that limited animal testing while continuing toxicity research. In 2004, the European Union Cosmetic Testing Ban was introduced. Finalized in 2013, the ban protects all animals from both cosmetic product and ingredient testing (“EU: Final ban”, n.d.). The ban was implemented primarily due to the development and availability of

Similar Essays

It's Time For A More Responsible Approach To Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1442 words - 6 pages about how your products have been tested for human use. I am not advocating the complete abolishment of testing but rather, a responsible outlook on the types of testing done and the alternatives. WORKS CITED ~ 1. "Alternatives to Animal Testing on the Web." http://altweb.jhsph.edu/ 2. Burne, Jerome. "Animal Testing is a disaster." The Guardian. 24 May 2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/ 3. "Questions and Answers about the

We Need More Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

1477 words - 6 pages We Need More Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation   A life can be taken or created in a matter of seconds and with that has come the miracles of modern medicine. People have come to expect science to save lives, prevent illness, relieve suffering and improve the quality of life. The means of curing, treating and preventing diseases are not achieved by magic or accident. Medical advances are gained through years of intensive

Let's Put An End To Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation

2006 words - 8 pages We Must Put an End to Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation Without animal research, cures for such diseases as typhoid, diphtheria, and polio might never have existed. Without animal research, the development of antibiotics and insulin would have been delayed. Without animal research, many human beings would now be dead. However, because of animal testing, 200,000 dogs, 50,000 cats, 60,000 primates, 1.5 million hamsters, and

Needless Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation Is Wrong

964 words - 4 pages Needless Animal Experimentation is Wrong   If penicillin had been tested on guinea pigs, it might never have reached the public. It is lethal to guinea pigs, deactivates the blood system of rabbits and is deadly to cats ("Bio-Medical Research"). Scientists are pushing for more experiments regardless of the cost to the animal's life. "One expense is the involvement of killing animals in the pursuit of a pine-scented air freshener"(Vergoth