From everyday experiences to recent news stories, I have come across many issues that large families face in America. Poverty and child abuse are top issues in the United States. For this reason, I believe the government should start regulating the number of children people can have based on financial stability, place of residence, criminal history, and other qualifications. The ideal American family image is one that provides parents that gracefully accommodate and nurture their children with open arms, financial cohesion, warm meals, and a roof over their heads. Although one might think these characteristics are a given, they are not as common as the general population widely assumes. There are many individuals deemed “unfit parents” who, despite complaints and adequate resources, continue to reproduce, putting children’s lives at stake. This brings up the question at hand: should up and coming parents be required to obtain a license to start a family?
As a brief history, Child Protective Services (CPS) agencies were founded after the 1974 CAPTA was passed, which mandated that all states establish procedures to investigate suspected incidents of child maltreatment. In the 1940s and 1950s, due to advancements in the medical field, the medical profession began to take notice of what they thought to be the abuse of children. In 1961, C. Henry Kempe began to further research this issue, eventually discovering battered child syndrome. Data collected from the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services states that in 2011, over 676,000 children were determined to be victims of abuse or neglect. Previously, neglect was the most common form of child abuse, but victims also suffered from physical abuse, sexual abuse and psychological abuse.
I would like to begin with teen pregnancy in the United States. The U.S. Office of Adolescent Health reports that in 2012, there were 29.4 births for every 1,000 adolescent females ages 15-19, and the United States’ teenage pregnancy rate is higher than that of the majority of other countries, including Canada and the United Kingdom. I believe requiring certification and/or a regulation process would seriously decrease these statistics and would also most likely reduce the rate of high school dropout rates, because even when most teenage pregnancies are accidental, there might be more precautions taken if there are legal risks involved in getting pregnant without going through the correct process.
Further, it would possibly eliminate other problems such as forced/abusive marriages, alcoholism, postpartum depression, and other problems that are caused by unforeseen and accidental pregnancies. There are so many children that were unplanned that go through life neglected because they are unwanted, and they never get to experience a happy family life. This can lead to an early life of crime, depression, or even early suicide. The foster care system also switches around children so quickly...