This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

A Combination Of Tsarist Incompetence And Popular Dissatisfaction Led To February 1917, But In October It Was Bolsheviks Armed With Radical Ideas That Seized Power. Discuss.

1949 words - 8 pages

A combination of tsarist incompetence and popular dissatisfaction led to the events of February 1917, but in October it was rather Bolshevik revolutionaries armed with radical ideas that seized power. Discuss.The underlying reasons for the Russian Revolution were rooted deep in Russia's history. For centuries, autocratic and repressive tsarist regimes ruled the country and most of the population lived under severe economic and social conditions. During the 19th century and early 20th century various movements aimed at overthrowing the oppressive government. These were staged at different times by students, workers, peasants, and members of the nobility. Two of these unsuccessful movements were the 1825 revolt against Nicholas I and the revolution of 1905, both of which were attempts to establish a constitutional monarchy. Russia's badly organized and unsuccessful involvement in World War I added to popular discontent with the government's corruption and inefficiency. In 1917 these events resulted in the fall of the tsarist government and the establishment of the Bolshevik Party, a radical offshoot of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party, as the ruling power.# The revolution of February 1917 came about due to 2 main causes. The Tsar and how he ran the country and the public's dissatisfaction with their country and how it was being run. The countries poor involvement in WWI also added to the rising discontent against Nicholas as the Russian armies suffered terrible casualties and defeats because of a lack of food and equipment. the country was also industrially backward compared to countries at the time such as Britain, France, Germany, and the USA. It had failed to modernise, this was to do with the Tsars lack of effort for reforms and an inability to make the country move forward economically. The country was undergoing tremendous hardships as industrial and agricultural output dropped. Famine could be found in all aspects of Russian life. This led to poor morale among the people. Furthermore, the Tsar also committed a fatal mistake when he appointed himself supreme commander of the armed forces because he was responsible for the armies constant string of defeats. While the Tsar was off defending the country, Rasputin made his way into the governments affairs. Because of his help with the Tsar's sick young son, Alexandra gave him great political control in the affairs of state. Rasputin dismissed twenty-one ministers and replaced them with men of great incompetence. Although he was eventually murdered but the damage to the tsar's image had already been done#. When Russia first entered World War 1 there was, or at least there appeared to be a degree of public unity and confidence in their country. However as time went on and the Russian army were unable to compete with the much more industrialised Germany, public support for the war diminished. The war put a massive strain on the Russian economy and the food...

Find Another Essay On A combination of tsarist incompetence and popular dissatisfaction led to February 1917, but in October it was Bolsheviks armed with radical ideas that seized power. Discuss.

"Zimbabwe achieved independence through a combination of negotiation and armed force". Discuss, for the period of 1965 to 1980. (70)

1313 words - 5 pages and Independent Zimbabwe.In conclusion, had negotiations started at an earlier stage and had they been more effective, armed force would not have been required. However, it was the armed forces that played a large role in Rhodesia's Independence as they forced negotiations to take place and for Rhodesia to be proclaimed independent. It was a combination of armed forces and negotiations but the armed forces were the more effective of the two.

Why, in the late 1960s and ‘70s did a number of radical filmmakers turn to the work of Bertolt Brecht for ideas and inspiration? Discuss with referen

1244 words - 5 pages his attempt at offering the audience some comfort in the characters. To finish, many filmmakers in the 1960s and 70’s turned to the work of Bertolt Brecht due to a number of reasons. One of the core reason is Brecht’s defamiliarization effect, I discussed that the effect of distancing the audience was necessary because it allows the audience to not be distracted by the film and became aware that the films are a depiction of reality and not

The Russian Revolution: To what extent was powerful revolutionary leadership and clear revolutionary ideas the reason for the successful Bolshevik revolution in October 1917?

1703 words - 7 pages . On returning to Russia from Switzerland he immediately made demands. Lenin demanded that there should be a worldwide socialist revolution, the Soviets should take power and no longer cooperate with the Provisional Government, land should be given to the peasants and they were to end their involvement in the war. By the end of April 1917 Lenin had used his captivating personality and power of argument as a means to convince the Bolsheviks to

Poor Living and Working Conditions as the Reason for Bolsheviks' Seizure of Power in 1917

1077 words - 4 pages facilities. Poor living and working conditions existed all the way, while other causes of the Bolshevik seizure of power came in later on. Peasants wanted change, but they were not getting it. The peasants became furious and more issues got worse for them. Everything added up towards their dissatisfaction. The 1917 Bolshevik seizure of power would not have occurred had conditions not been so bad, however if this was

How and why did Bolsheviks seize power in Russia in 1917?

675 words - 3 pages The Bolsheviks were a fraction of the Russian Social Democratic Labour Party. Their leader was Vladimir Lenin. In October 1917 he lead Bolsheviks to a triumph in the Russian Revolution. From now on Russia became a single party state, which later became the Soviet Union. In this Essay the author would like to present an account of the events in which Bolsheviks took power in Russia and consider facts that made it possible.The first signs of

'It was not the weakness of the nationalists but the strengths of the colonial rulers that led to the failure of the nationalist movements in SEA before WWII.' How far is this true?

3039 words - 12 pages French role in liberating domination and implied that continued French presence could guarantee the existence of a Lao identity. As education was able to shape the natives' perception of colonial rule, such conditions downplayed the nationalist movements and served the French's interests of not being dislodged as colonial rulers. In Vietnam by the 1930s, Hanoi and Hue as well as Saigon had newspapers with circulations of up to 15, 000 copies. But

How accurate is it to say that Lenin’s leadership was the reason for Bolshevik success in November 1917.

925 words - 4 pages success, we also have the mistakes of the Provisional Government and its overall weakness. By starting with Lenin’s April Thesis we can analyse its key points which structured around the idea of “No Support for the Provisional Government” from this it developed into a campaign to give all power to the soviets, or in reality the Bolsheviks. The April Thesis basically outlined the plan for the November revolution and essentially set the

October Sky the movie: "October Sky explores universal themes that are relevant in any decade. Discuss."

556 words - 2 pages . The generation gap between Homer and John that caused a lot of their problems obviously still occurs between families in every country of our decade and will probably still occur for the rest of time.The themes dealt with in October Sky, such as the pursuit of a dream, family conflict, generation gap and more such as financial problems have been around for a long time and probably for a long time to

'It is good to have an end to journey toward, but it is the journey that matters in the end' Ursula LeQuin. Discuss this concept with reference to other texts

739 words - 3 pages contrasting light returns with the girl seeing a seedling in her room which is emblematic to her that their was hope and potential all along. In this case all that would matter is the end to journey toward.These many different inner journeys have different outcomes ranging from Life Is Beautiful were it was the journey that mattered and not the end, to the other extreme in The Red Tree were the girl did not care for her journey but for the positive outcome of the end of her inner journey and the various other situations and varying degrees to which Ursula's concept could be applied.

Was the British Empire a good thing that enlarged the world creating possibilities for everyone or was it just a way for some to gain power and wealth?

772 words - 3 pages required, and Britain's self image of power gave it the will to use force if necessary. Imperialism is the way in which a group gains formal or informal influence over another group's politics, society, and economy.Firstly, there isn't an explanation why Britain gained so much global power so suddenly. It has been said that perhaps it was due to British superiority economically as well as its technology. British expansion during the 19th century

"It might be thought that UK police discretion is tightly constrained by legal rules. At times it is but more frequently it is not" Discuss in the context of Stop and Search

3419 words - 14 pages compartmentalising that much of the criticism concerning prejudice and victimisation stems. It is the permitting of discretionary power to such a force that concerns followers of 'due process' models. But are the police collectively as dangerous as this would suggest or are they merely compartmentalising society into manageable segments, much in the same way as the Government and Parliament do and ultimately much in the same way as society itself

Similar Essays

Explain Why The Combination Of Circumstances Surrounding The 1917 October Revolution Presented The Bolsheviks With An Unique Opportunity To Seize Power

1429 words - 6 pages from peasants in the provinces who found new hope in their proposals and they could count on support from the armed forces to enforce measures they wished to carry out. This situation was attributable to the combination of governmental incompetence, social uprisings, effects of war surrounding the October Revolution, which led to the overriding lack of order and the Bolsheviks' ability to restore it.BibliographyABRAMOVITCH, Rapheal, R.; The Soviet

Bolsheviks' Power 1917 1924 Essay

917 words - 4 pages government policies led to widespread strikes and uprisings, to which the regime responded with more repression. In March 1921 the sailors at the Kronshtadt naval base, who previously had been allies of the Bolsheviks, staged a revolt against the regime's economic policies and repression of workers' strikes. In late 1921 War Communism was abandoned and Lenin introduced the New Economic Policy (NEP). The NEP relaxed government control and allowed the bourgeois to return in order to encourage economic recovery, although the state remained in control of large companies.

Why Were The Bolsheviks Successful In Russia, October 1917?

827 words - 3 pages main sections of the Russian ruling class, in alliance with the French and the British, desperately tried to prevent even more upheaval. They agreed that the Tsar of Russia would have to go. Tsars had ruled Russia as emperors for hundreds of years, but now the provisional government took over.The Bolsheviks, led by Lenin, stood alone for a second revolution- they said that after overthrowing the Tsar (the first revolution), the time had come to

Why Was There A Revolution In Russia In February 1917?

1356 words - 5 pages his incompetence, he often needed to rely on the people around him. Two of the most influential figures to him were his tutor, Pobedonostsev, and his wife Alexandra. Pobedonostsev was a reactionary, who helped to reinforce the ideas of reforming was a threat to the autocracy in Nicholas. Nicholas was a believer in autocracy, which could be seen in his statement at his coronation, "I shall defend the principle of autocracy as unswervingly as my