This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

A Room Of 12 Angry Men

1298 words - 6 pages

Twelve men are put in a room to decide the fate of a boy on trial. Did he commit murder? Or didn’t he? At first none of the men seem to care about the boy. He grew up in the slums, had a criminal record, and was always in trouble. Every one of the men had someplace they needed to go and just wanted to get it over with, especially juror number seven, a baseball fan who was going to miss his baseball game. They took a vote, and as expected, everyone voted guilty. It was an open and shut case. All the evidence was there. It was clear the boy committed the crime. Now everyone could go home, but, wait, there was one person whose vote did not match the others. One person cared. One person saw ...view middle of the document...

And then, while before he was just trying to force everyone to talk about it, his logic began to make sense, and so, he actually began to defend the boy. He truly started to believe the boy was innocent, which put the rest of the jurors in an uproar.
Juror one took charge when it was time to vote, but let everyone else dispute the points. He was a football coach. Juror two was unobtrusive, tried to see reason, and believed everyone should have a chance to talk. Juror three was too set on old ways and seemed to have his own reasons for saying the boy was guilty that had nothing to do with the case. His son was a lot like the boy, and had run away from him years ago. Juror four was dead set on the fact that a woman saw the murder take place, and believed her testimony, even though it was dark and she was on a moving train. Juror six was quiet and content to let everyone else fight and argue about it. He was a follower, but stepped in when someone was being rude. Juror seven was impatient, stereotypical, and immature. He didn’t care at all. He just wanted to make it to his baseball game. Though he was a loud mouth and seemed to be a leader, he was actually a follower and would just vote with the majority. Juror nine was originally a follower and stood behind jurors three and four. Juror ten was rich and extremely stereotypical of people who lived in slums. He believed they were all ruthless and all deserved to die. Juror eleven was analytical, took notes, and saw all sides. Juror twelve was nervous and uncertain and didn’t want to be there. He was content to doodle in his notebook and caved in under pressure.

Juror eight realized it was impossible for him to win if he stood alone and called for another vote, hoping against hope that someone would vote with him. Everyone was stunned when juror nine, who was initially a follower, voted not guilty. He refuted everyone’s irritated shouts and stood up for himself and juror eight. As juror eight and nine continued to discuss the point of the boy more people joined their side, starting with juror five, who, as it turned out, grew up in the slums just like the boy. He took the knife and demonstrated how the boy would have held it underhand instead of overhand, thus proving that the boy could not be the killer. They raised the point that there was an old man a few floors above the crime scene who...

Find Another Essay On A Room of 12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men Essay

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men Essay

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

12 Angry Men

1475 words - 6 pages remaining eleven are persuaded to a not-guilty verdict. “Twelve Angry Men” highlights many social psychology concepts, specifically: conformity, persuasion, and fundamental attribution. Conformity is a dangerous mechanism, especially within the presence of a jury room. A major motif throughout “Twelve Angry Men,” the power of normative social influence and informational social influence is evident throughout the deliberation. Normative social

12 Angry Men - 1445 words

1445 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict

12 Angry Men - 550 words

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

"12 angry men."

721 words - 3 pages that they really need to stop and think logicly about the facts in the case. The black and white film is appropriate to issues of right and wrong, a murder trial, and the death penalty. The camera work, focusing on the jurors' faces and the attitudes they reveal, and small clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors create a large canvas of twelve angry men who will decide whether the accused will live or die. Small "sub-scenes" within the

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt. Juror number ten is an African American ex-Muslim male who is an angry racist man who is also suffering from the flu. He is inconsiderate of the other men and continuously shows his biases and disrespect. He attempts to lead the others, but ultimately fails. Juror number eleven is an immigrant to America and speaks about justice because he has seen it firsthand. Juror number twelve is a white male. He is advertiser and constantly

Analysis 12 angry men

3337 words - 13 pages an emotional effect on the reader (see p. 19 of your pack and all the prose in the pack and try to find how we have built in short quotes and analysed the effect of certain writing styles on the reader)An example of a fully discussed example:"Herr Bock seems sinister and petty when he sits in 'his conspirational room' in a 'dark room' in a 'dark street', waiting silently with Funder for her taxi. The reader feels unease and fear with this

Leadership in 12 Angry Men

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

Film Analysis: 12 Angry Men

1060 words - 5 pages In the film 12 angry men, 12 jurors are put in a room to discuss a first degree murder case. Each one has a very different characteristic than the next, but each contribute to the stories plot line equally. Each juror can be classified as the average “every day” person; the silent but analytical, the loud and stubborn or the mediator. The one juror that is more like myself is Juror #11. I find myself to be most like him because he is unbiased

Similar Essays

A Summary Of 12 Angry Men

1425 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men 12 Angry men is about a group of men who are appointed as jury’s. They are put in a room until they could come up with a conclusion, on whether the boy who was convicted of murder is guilty or not. Jury foremen #1 was seated at the head of the table. Portrayed as a good leader, and a thoughtful listener. When there is a quarrel between the men, he was the one who would break if off and advice them to settle down and talk about it

Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader who fought till the end. The

Summary Of 12 Angry Men Essay

780 words - 4 pages This report is on a movie called, “12 Angry Men.” The movie is about 12 men that are the jury for a case where a young man is being accused of killing his father. A major conflict that is very obvious is the disagreement on whether the young boy was guilty or innocent. After court when all of the men sat down to begin their discussion Courtney B. Vance (#1) Took charge and respectfully was now the leader. He asked what everyone’s votes were

12 Angry Men Essay 1776 Words

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not