A Summary Of 12 Angry Men

1425 words - 6 pages

12 Angry Men
12 Angry men is about a group of men who are appointed as jury’s. They are put in a room until they could come up with a conclusion, on whether the boy who was convicted of murder is guilty or not.
Jury foremen #1 was seated at the head of the table. Portrayed as a good leader, and a thoughtful listener. When there is a quarrel between the men, he was the one who would break if off and advice them to settle down and talk about it like civil men. Was a football coach in his early years, and his team lost the championship game. He is very organized and also when needed to vote he would count the votes.
Juror #2 was a grandpa, and was new the whole jury idea. He never said ...view middle of the document...

But after everyone had voted not guilty, he took to heart and voted not guilty.
Juror#4 it seemed as if he was some kind of professor, very calm held himself very well and was knowledgeable. While the other men sweated a lot, he never sweated. When he talked everyone turned and listened, he was very specific and very detailed on what had happened on the crime scene. After seeing the boys fears and feelings merrier in his life, he was willing to change his vote to not guilty.
Juror#5 he never really said much, but he always had that look when you see someone looking and searching for the past. It seemed as if he knew where the boy had come from, because of his past. Also he was very insightful on how the boy used the knife to stab his father. Though he didn't say it, right from the start he voted that the boy was not guilty. He has an argument with guy number 3 and guy number 10.
Juror#6 was a very un desisted man. First he said the boy was guilty, and then when he hears a good argument he changes his mind. He sweated a lot, talked about willing to look at the whole picture of the case and not skip even the smallest evidence. He was a curious man, and very kind to everyone especially to guy number 9. Very happy to be their rather than his work, he tried to talk to the other men but most of them just ignored him. And brings out that the boy had to have had some motivation for killing his father. Also shows that he has much respect for guy number 9. After changing his mind many times he came around to not guilty.
Juror#7 loves baseball and is always commenting on whatever the others say. He is a very talkative and carefree guy. Gets very inpatient with whole thing, he just wants to go to the baseball game. Has a fight with guy number 11 about why he changed his mind to not guilty, when he has been yelling that the boy was guilty. Makes smart remarks, and he likes gambling. He also gets in an argument with guy number 5 when he changes his vote to not guilty. But after awhile he knew that the boy was not guilty.
Juror#8 was the first guys that spook up and said the boy was not guilty. He was very persuasive, and always gives the others something to think about. He seemed very knowledgeable, and resourceful on the boy’s situation. Defended the boy very well and presented that the boy’s father had been beating him since he was 5 years of age. He took the time to recreate the crime scene, and show the others that the witness might have been wrong. Was very calm through the whole thing, while others yelled and fought. Talked...

Find Another Essay On A Summary of 12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men Essay

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men Essay

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men

1475 words - 6 pages remaining eleven are persuaded to a not-guilty verdict. “Twelve Angry Men” highlights many social psychology concepts, specifically: conformity, persuasion, and fundamental attribution. Conformity is a dangerous mechanism, especially within the presence of a jury room. A major motif throughout “Twelve Angry Men,” the power of normative social influence and informational social influence is evident throughout the deliberation. Normative social

12 Angry Men - 1167 words

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

12 Angry Men - 1445 words

1445 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt. Juror number ten is an African American ex-Muslim male who is an angry racist man who is also suffering from the flu. He is inconsiderate of the other men and continuously shows his biases and disrespect. He attempts to lead the others, but ultimately fails. Juror number eleven is an immigrant to America and speaks about justice because he has seen it firsthand. Juror number twelve is a white male. He is advertiser and constantly

"12 angry men."

721 words - 3 pages that they really need to stop and think logicly about the facts in the case. The black and white film is appropriate to issues of right and wrong, a murder trial, and the death penalty. The camera work, focusing on the jurors' faces and the attitudes they reveal, and small clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors create a large canvas of twelve angry men who will decide whether the accused will live or die. Small "sub-scenes" within the

Analysis 12 angry men

3337 words - 13 pages WHY (meanings and audience effect). It's better to use fewer examples and analyse them well, than to give us a shopping list of every example in the text that proves your point.In Year 12 essays, quotes are less important than writing devices and features.You can use quotes anywhere in an essay but also ensure you concentrate on the various ways characters and events are presented. Obviously, metalanguage typical of both fiction and non-fiction

Leadership in 12 Angry Men

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

Film Analysis: 12 Angry Men

1060 words - 5 pages In the film 12 angry men, 12 jurors are put in a room to discuss a first degree murder case. Each one has a very different characteristic than the next, but each contribute to the stories plot line equally. Each juror can be classified as the average “every day” person; the silent but analytical, the loud and stubborn or the mediator. The one juror that is more like myself is Juror #11. I find myself to be most like him because he is unbiased

Similar Essays

Summary Of 12 Angry Men Essay

780 words - 4 pages This report is on a movie called, “12 Angry Men.” The movie is about 12 men that are the jury for a case where a young man is being accused of killing his father. A major conflict that is very obvious is the disagreement on whether the young boy was guilty or innocent. After court when all of the men sat down to begin their discussion Courtney B. Vance (#1) Took charge and respectfully was now the leader. He asked what everyone’s votes were

A Room Of 12 Angry Men

1298 words - 6 pages Twelve men are put in a room to decide the fate of a boy on trial. Did he commit murder? Or didn’t he? At first none of the men seem to care about the boy. He grew up in the slums, had a criminal record, and was always in trouble. Every one of the men had someplace they needed to go and just wanted to get it over with, especially juror number seven, a baseball fan who was going to miss his baseball game. They took a vote, and as expected

Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader who fought till the end. The

12 Angry Men Essay 550 Words

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a