Academic Progress: Will No Child Be Left Behind?

2248 words - 9 pages

Academic Progress: Will No Child Be Left Behind?

“These reforms express my deep belief in our public schools and their mission to build the mind and character of every child, from every background, in every part of America.”—President George W. Bush (Executive Summary, 2001).

“We like the bill, but this is a resource issue.”—Peter McWalters, commissioner of education in Rhode Island (Coeyman, 2002).

“No Child Left Behind? Everyone hates it. It’s a joke. Not obtainable.”—teacher.

The No Child Left Behind Act provides incentives for school districts to bring up academic progress, but instead the pressure involved may lead to poor-performing schools falsifying data, teaching to the test, or promoting unprepared students instead of truly improving student performance. Schools which do not achieve their Academic Yearly Progress for two sequential years will suffer loss of funding, corrective action, and may be closed. However, the only way to gauge academic progress on a nation-wide level is through standardized testing, which has serious limitations as a diagnostic tool. The concept of Academic Yearly Progress can lead to bizarre and arbitrary classifications of successful and failing. In additional, some of the corrective measures prescribed by NCLB may be inadequate.

Rather than merely reaffirming the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965, President Bush oversaw a complete restructuring. This restructuring, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, decrees that every student will be at the academic level deemed proficient by the 2013-14 school year. To achieve this goal, it calls for strict academic accountability. States still have the responsibility of determining their own statewide assessment programs, but are required to set a target of Academic Yearly Progress that each child must meet or exceed. This AYP must be either.

“The first option is the percent of students at the proficient level for the lowest-performing subgroup of students. The second option is for states to rank schools by the percent of students proficient on state tests in 2001-02, and then set the bar at the point at which one-fifth of all students are in schools with lower proficiency levels” (Education Week, 2002)

The states will test their students yearly, and these results will be verified by federal testing. The National Assessment of Education Progress will test a random sample of fourth and eighth graders every other year. However, many experts have observed that “that rising test scores don't seem to generalize to any other index of achievement…. in a number of states with high-stakes testing programs, while scores were rising on the high-stakes tests, math scores on the SAT, the ACT, and the NAEP fell.”
(Bracey, 2002). This can be attributed to teachers, under pressure to prove academic progress, “teaching to the test” instead of covering basic skills and core material. In addition, cultural, economic, and social variables will...

Find Another Essay On Academic Progress: Will No Child Be Left Behind?

No Child Left Behind Essay

2533 words - 10 pages and the amount of money available, no child will be left behind. Why the focus on strengthening the reading skills of children? It has been proven that those students who can not read well are more likely to drop out of school and have lower-paying jobs. Reading is the “foundation for success in society” (Paige, 17). Those students that have a strong early beginning in reading have more successful school careers. Success in reading

No Child Left Behind Essay

618 words - 3 pages feel like crap. Making bad grades on tests, and quizzes, can have a horrible affect. People should never have an opportunity to put others down, so get good grades, or keep things to yourself. When seeing others accomplish great grades, should make people strive for greatness. Believing that no child should be left behind, makes myself as an individual work harder. Thinking about

No Child Left Behind Law

978 words - 4 pages levels to continue to learn through ability grouping. Education in the United States will never be perfect but we can learn from the mistakes of No Child Left Behind and improve education for students across the country. Works Cited Darling-Hammond, Linda. "Evaluating No Child Left Behind." Nation 284.20 (2007): 11-18. Academic Search Complete. EBSCO. Web. 12 Oct. 2011. "No Child Left Behind." Carleton College: A Private Liberal Arts

No Child Left Behind Debate

1691 words - 7 pages the test" and over-emphasizing mathematics and reading education. This bill motivates instructors to "teach the test", an instructional method that is looked down upon by many. This is the result of government interference in the education sector. The government, under No Child Left Behind, tells schools that their students must be proficient on state exams by the year 2014. If these schools do not meet this standard then, the government will take

No Child Left Behind Essay

1523 words - 6 pages % increase. As well as a 68.5% increase for special education (IDEA) grants. The total increase of NCLB funding has raised 40.4% from $17.4 billion in 2001 to $24.4 billion in 2007.It is great that our countries leaders want to better educate our leaders of tomorrow and once every aspect of No Child Left Behind is evaluated and fixed as needed it may work wonderfully. Our schools will function smoother; our teachers will be able to teach our students

no child left behind act

2208 words - 9 pages the nation and each category take a look at all youngstersunderneath identical procedure and with identical take a look at to stop student from being bunker in a very weakness faculty. different procedure were conjointly place into use by the of the No kid Left Behind Act. States were needed by the 2013-2014 academic year to own all educate Congress of Racial Equality "skilled" on State tests. By the 2002-2003 academic year spring AND story of

No Child Left Behind Act

2004 words - 8 pages , 2005).  Even though this will not completely eliminate the acts of bullies, it will be a step towards prevention. Regardless of the field of practice, issues are always present and new concerns will always occur.  However, what determines whether we are successful is how we handle these issues and how we let these issues influence us.  The current issues discussed that will soon affect and influence my teaching are the No Child Left Behind

No Child Left Behind Assessment

1364 words - 5 pages good teaching and setting appropriate assessment tasks should question students in a way that demands evidence of understanding” (Jimaa, 20011, p. 217). The No Child Left Behind (NCLB) education reform program is a good example of this concept. The ambitious federal education bill that President Bush signed into law in 2002, NCLB, required the federal government to use its spending power to prod school districts across the country to rely on

No Child Left Behind Analysis

955 words - 4 pages “No Child Left Behind” The Problem Public school districts are known to imply that “No child will be left behind”, after President Bush passed the “No Child Left Behind Act of 2001” in 2002 (No Child Left Behind, 2003). However, many children are and teachers are beginning to be left behind as well. The U.S government is warning educators across the nation of massive terminations, school closures, and shorter school years, claiming the need

No child left behind act

572 words - 2 pages Since the leave no child behind act more school districts are beginning to provide programs for their students who have special needs. This case study is about children who are mentally retarded being included in regular classes in high school. This research was taken with the financial help of the Centre de re`adaptation Lisette-Dupras, the Education Department at University` du Que`bec a` Montreal, the foundation quefecoise de las

The No Child Left Behind Act

1441 words - 6 pages concerning the effectiveness of NCLB, as well as the implications to America’s youth. Thesis The No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 should be revised to allow better accountability of student success, accountability of schools progress, and better flexibility for teachers. About “No Child Left Behind” Signed into law in 2002, the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 had ample bipartisan support. Implementing the belief that setting high achievement

Similar Essays

No Child Left Behind Essay

862 words - 3 pages of these Special Education advocates arguments.Special Education students are a group of individuals who should be tested at their own academic achievement level. If Special Education students are held to high standard they may not succeed in high school, or even higher education. Less rigid guidelines for NCLB can help disabled students graduate along with their peers. States must be allowed to bend and relax No Child Left Behind to allow

No Child Left Behind Essay

1010 words - 4 pages progressing (The Facts About). Not only will the testing results show individual growth and progress, but as well as show the strengths and weaknesses in each school system (The Facts About). “No Child Left Behind will test every child in grades three through eight and give parents report cards for every school – highlighting success and shining a light on failure” (The Facts About). The fact schools are working this hard in order to ensure

No Child Left Behind Essay

1699 words - 7 pages development and prosperity of our country. It has enhanced American financial and administrative leadership. In acknowledging the importance of education, the federal government took upon a grander role of financing public schools with the passage of Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA) in 1965, which along the years was subjected to various reauthorizations. In 2001, the reauthorizations included No Child Left behind Act (NCLB), which required

No Child Left Behind Essay

2884 words - 12 pages reach the university level. By using only the standardized system of NCLB, students will be unable to comprehend higher education and learn on their own as everything they have needed previously was provided to them over and over. Measuring the accountability of the No Child Left Behind Act is not an easy task. The blatant question that must be answered is “Who is the accountable party?” Many would say that the federal government had the largest