Acceptance and Commitment Therapy versus Cognitive Therapy for the Treatment of Comorbid Eating Pathology
Critiquing a Scientific Article
This article aims to prove that Acceptance and Commitment is the best method for treating eating disorders. Although Cognitive Behavior Therapy has shown some promising results. It supports this claim by stating that Cognitive Therapy is an effective treatment for bulimia and was given a grade A by the National Institute for Clinical Effectiveness Guidelines. The authors are aiming to determine which is an effective method, Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) or Cognitive Behavior Treatment (CBT). Although, it is a new theory it has proven very effective. Scientific studies of CBT have confirmed its effectiveness for a wide variety of mental illnesses including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, personality disorders, eating ...view middle of the document...
Then they learn to change their slanted thinking. When they think more realistically, they feel better. The emphasis is also consistently on solving problems and starting a new behavioral change.
This article highlights the advantages of ACT versus CBT. The results of the 55 participants in a study determining which one is more effective. Through many tests and studies it shown that ACT is more effective at reducing the eating pathology, but only for those with a more severe eating pathology. In the discussion the authors alluded to the fact that even though ACT is a more effective therapy than CBT. The reason being is that ACT deals with the core issues that are usually associated with eating pathology. ACT understands that the patient needs to learn to understand their body shape, food or weight and encourage a desire to chance their particular mindset in regards to their eating habits.
The increasing popularity of ACT in recent years has begun to draw the attention and scrutiny of proponents of traditional of CBT many of whom have expressed skepticism about the approach. In recent articles and book chapters, some critics have argued that ACT offers relatively minor variations compared with traditional CBT, as does this article. CBT is an alternative that should be used alongside with ACT as it has equal if not the same results as CBT.
The article states that ACT is more effecting at treating eating disorders, but I believe that ACT and CBT can be used hand in hand in treating these disorders. ACT incorporates acceptance strategies, mindfulness techniques, and a wide range of behavioral approaches already known to be effective from CBT. ACT is similar to the CBT tradition in the sense that it focuses on the person's relationship to experiences rather than on the content of these experiences. The data on ACT and related approaches are indicating that CBT is a new model that emphasizes being open, centered, and mindful and actively pursuing values. This is what is needed to accurately solve these eating disorders.