This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Act Utilitarianism Essay

770 words - 4 pages

Every decision and every action has a consequence. Whether is positive or negative, there are end results. The goal of act-utilitarianism is to limit suffering while increasing pleasurable consequences for the greatest number of people. In many situations, this requires making unique calculations to determine if an act that goes against certain principles can be justified as being morally right in the instance of a specific case. What may seem like a poor choice of actions for a brief period could result in desirable consequences if played correctly. In certain instances, this may not hold up because there are acts so immoral that the greatest consequences could not be worth it which is why ...view middle of the document...

Low and behold, we pulled up right next to my aunt that we were going to visit. Why would my parents drag along empty suitcases trying to mislead my sister and I that they were coming along? Now I began to worry and wonder about whether I was prepared for what was going to happen. Thankfully, for myself and everyone included, I didn’t have to wait long.
Much of the suffering was minimized because, by the time we got to Portland, it was dark and the day was almost over. Hours of speculation and unanswered questions were cut short by the need for sleep. The morning held no time for further pondering because we were awoken abruptly in the very early morning hours by the crowd of my aunt, uncle, and cousins informing my sister and I to get ready. In the next hour we’d leave for the airport and later in the day we’d arrive in Orlando, Florida for Disneyworld! All of the worries I would have toted if I knew about the trip when it was initially planned flooded me. I’d miss a band concert, a few tennis matches, dance recital practice, and homework. I’d never been on a plane before or traveled so far away...

Find Another Essay On Act-Utilitarianism

Utilitarianism: founding fathers, strengths and weaknesses of act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism, other forms of utilitarianism, and recent philosophers

1528 words - 6 pages are harmonized with some major flaws. I will discuss the founding fathers of utilitarianism, the strengths and weaknesses of act-utilitarianism and rule-utilitarianism, other forms of utilitarianism, and recent philosophers of this school of thought.This idea of the greatest good for the greatest number was developed by Jeremy Bentham. Although the ides of utilitarianism is often traced back to and credited to Jeremy Bentham, John Stuart Mill

What's the difference between act (AU) and rule utilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths and weaknesses of each?

554 words - 3 pages What's the difference between act (AU) and ruleutilitarianism (RU)? What are the strengths andweaknesses of each?In the past Utilitarianism was judged on each individual action, after many years pastedthen Utilitarianism was judge on the consequences of the truth and a lie. Yourconsequences are judged on thoughts such as a promise you made or the truth you wastold. "The new version of the theory Rule Utilitarianism, which is distinguishing it

Explain the Main difference between Act and Rule Utilitarianism (it can also be used to explain the main difference between Bentham and Mill)

2697 words - 11 pages John Stuart Mill have become recognised as the two greatest sponsors of Utilitarianism. Bentham is known for his popularisation of the more traditional version of the theory, know as Act Utilitarianism. Although a student of Bentham, Mill could see problems in what he was being taught and so began to develop his own views on Utilitarianism, which are now known as Rule Utilitarianism.Bentham was a great traditionalist believer in the expression

A philosphical essay on Utilitarianism

660 words - 3 pages Utilitarianism is a way of looking at ethics, it focuses on trying to ensure the maximum happiness in many different ways. There are many different forms of utilitarianism, the four I will discuss are act, rule, naive and preference utilitarianism.Rule utilitarianism tries to give the greatest overall benefit to society, the best rule/law of conduct is found and everyone is found an a rule utilitarian will follow it. However, this can cause

Society Must be Governed by Rules

1719 words - 7 pages believe that a specific variation of Utilitarianism -- Rule Utilitarianism -- can adequately address these problems, and it is therefore the most plausible ethical theory. Rule Utilitarianism is derived from the basic Utilitarian principle of the greatest good for the greatest number. However, where Act Utilitarianism addresses each individual action or situation in reference to this principle, Rule Utilitarianism states that we must use the

Utilitarianism

760 words - 3 pages versions. Act utilitarianism is one of the versions of utilitarianism. Act utilitarianism’s goal is to maximize the overall happiness of the universe. Act utilitarianism uses the Greatest Happiness Principle which says in every situation, choose the option that you believe to be most likely to produce the greatest possible happiness or least possible unhappiness for the all people who will be affected. An act utilitarian would determine if

Rules in Utilitarianism Reconsidered

1670 words - 7 pages Question 3: Is utilitarianism able to account for the importance of justice and honesty? Be sure to discuss both rule and act utilitarianism. Do either of these accounts work? Explain your answer. Justice and Honesty: Rules in Utilitarianism Reconsidered Utilitarianism, with the Principle of Utility or Greatest Happiness Principle being its core, is a consequentialist theory which attaches the greatest importance to the consequences of each

'Classical objection to utilitarianism is that it makes insufficient provision for considerations of rights and justice'. Discuss this quotation i

725 words - 3 pages Many objections have been made in contradiction to utilitarianism due to the theory having little concern for the rights and justice of individuals. Under utilitarianism philosophy as long as an act maximizes the “utility” (well-being) of the many it is viewed as the moral thing to do, however theories have risen which question utilitarianism due to the lack of concern for individuals within the outcome of acts. Good consequences for the maxim

Utilitarianism: Greatest Happiness Principle

2263 words - 9 pages , which are act utilitarianism and rule utilitarianism. (Mark Timmons, 2006) Each of them has a different guideline to follow. Act utilitarianism pays more attention to the consequences of a single action. Nevertheless, rule utilitarianism looks in the long-term aftermath from the result of following a rule of conduct under certain circumstances whenever it happens. (Sullivan & Pecorino, 2002) When dealing with a

A Brief Analysis of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism

1019 words - 4 pages ultimately bound by feeling, removing the possibility that one may act on intellect before emotion. This is highly debatable. Mill's fourth chapter is dedicated to a proof for utilitarianism in three parts: happiness is desirable, the general happiness is desirable, and happiness is the only desirable thing. Mill argues the desirability of happiness by analogy, stating that seen things are called visible, heard things are called audible, and

Utilitarianism

1459 words - 6 pages provides at least six examples to demonstrate the viewpoint; however in regards to restricted utilitarianism, Smart only uses two examples (rule "R", and Mill's nautical almanac).Smart raises a valid criticism when he says that restricted utilitarianism collapses into extreme utilitarianism:"If 'act optimically' is itself one of our rules then there will always be a conflict of rules whenever to keep a rule is not itself optimific. If this is so

Similar Essays

Act Versus Rule Utilitarianism Essay

1242 words - 5 pages In the textbook, Questions that Matter: An Invitation to Philosophy, utilitarianism is defined as “The ethical doctrine that an action is right if, and only if, it promotes the greatest happiness for the greatest number of people” (Miller and Jensen 376). There are two distinguishable positions within utilitarianism: rule-utilitarianism and act-utilitarianism. Rule-utilitarianism seeks to find which rule should be applied to a situation to

Kantianism And Act Utilitarianism Essay

1799 words - 7 pages Both Kantianism and Act Utilitarianism attempt to define our creation of morality and the importance of individual actions. One important aspect of both ideals in philosophy is that of equality. In terms of ethics, in practice and in study, philosophers seek to understand what governs a persons decisions and what motivates them to make those decisions. Ultimately, any action has a positive or negative reaction. This is a simple scientific fact

The Flaws Of Act Utilitarianism Essay

1775 words - 7 pages In this paper I will argue that John Stuart Mill, the presenter of the most compelling theory of act-utilitarianism (AU), ultimately falls short in addressing the moral complexities which factor into man’s virtues and its effect on his motives for certain actions. John Stuart Mill’s core arguments follow and contrast many theories established by Jeremy Bentham. Combining the idea of consequentialism, that consequences of actions are the

Critisism For Rule And Act Utilitarianism

1379 words - 6 pages “Utilitarianism is the view that the supreme principle of morality is to act so as to produce as much happiness as possible, each person counting equally” (Mill, 114). By ‘happiness’, this includes anything that is pleasurable and free of pain. Simply put, utilitarianism is the theory that an action is right, as long as it produces the greatest good for the most number of people (Peetush). The central point to this theory is that one must