This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Action And Observation In Shakespeare's King Lear

2386 words - 10 pages

Action and Observation in King Lear

 
     Auden once asserted that Shakespearean tragedy is necessarily parabolic, pertaining to the only myth that Christianity possesses: that of the 'unrepentant thief'. We as the spectators are thus implicated in the action since each of us 'is in danger of re-enacting [this story] in his own way'.1 The sufferings of the hero could be our own sufferings, whereas in Greek tragedy, such a notion is precluded precisely because the misfortunes of a character can be traced back to the discontent of the gods. Hippolytus is not a moral agent; Hamlet is. The aesthetic of Shakespearean tragedy is therefore dynamic, with an audience that, to a certain extent, are also participants. Auden proposes a model of observing based upon an Aristotelian conception of drama, one that involves the spectator in an emotional relationship with the characters on stage. King Lear too, offers the audience several quite distinct paradigms of both observation and action, and crucially, it is on the varying successes of these models that the tragedy hinges.

 

One does not need to look far in King Lear for a figure that might fit Auden's mould. Kent surely embodies that which Schlegel termed the 'science of compassion' in the play.2 He is publicly traduced and humiliated by Lear in Act I, Scene 1, and yet, in the guise of Caius, risks his life in order to serve his king still. Kent observes Lear's 'hideous rashness' (I.i.153) and he is motivated into participating in his master's sufferings:

 

I have a journey, sir, shortly to go;

My master calls me; I must not say no. (V.iii.323-324)

 

The simple rhyme, metric balance, and monosyllabic plainness of this couplet infuse the lines with a sense of tenderness. Kent's final, elegiac words are, like all his utterances, free of hyperbole and emotionally raw. Throughout the play his response to the action parallels the audience's own. Kent is the mouthpiece of the spectators when he entreats Lear to 'see better' (I.i.159), and his dismay at Cordelia's death, 'Is this the promised end?' (V.iii.264), speaks volumes. However, this should not hide the fact that Kent as a character is ineffectual. His final words do not embody an attempt to resolve or rectify, they are truly fatalistic. Kent then, is the Aristotelian observer. He participates in the action only by way of 'pity' for Lear, and the result is that he shares his master's fate. His observations lead him to emotionalise events, and much like Dr Johnson, who found King Lear 'too horrid to be endured', he 'sees feelingly'.3

 

But King Lear is a play of antitheses, and one might find a second, opposing model of observation in the character of Edgar. In Act III, disguised as Poor Tom, he is confronted by his aberrant, rain-beaten godfather, and though he fears that his distress may betray his 'counterfeiting' (III.vi.59-60), he does maintain his composure. Equally, in the following Act, when presented...

Find Another Essay On Action and Observation in Shakespeare's King Lear

Paratextuality in Shakespeare's King Lear Essay

3319 words - 13 pages Pitching Mad Boy: How Paratextuality Mediates the Distance Between Spectators, Adaptations, and Source Texts. A popular anecdote used to introduce students and spectators to King Lear tells how, for 150 years, the stage was dominated by Nahum Tate’s adaptation, in which Lear and Cordelia are happily reconciled, and Cordelia is married off to Edgar. Here is what N.H. Hudson had to say about Tate: This shameless, this execrable piece of

King Lear's Folly in Shakespeare's King Lear

1227 words - 5 pages King Lear's Folly    In Shakespeare's King Lear, the actions of King Lear and of his daughters bring ruin and chaos to England. Social structures crumble, foreign invaders threaten the land, and, in a distinctly non-Hollywood ending, almost everyone dies tragically. The outlook is very bleak, as many of the problems are left unresolved at the end of the play: There is no one in line to assume sovereignty, and justice and virtue have not

Villains, Sin, and Sex in Shakespeare's Othello and King Lear

1475 words - 6 pages Villains, Sin, and Sex in Othello and King Lear    Many of Shakespeare plays are littered with crude and graphic sexual references, jests, and insults. But there is one type of character present throughout Shakespeare's plays that twist the sexual imagery and repartee, and that is the villain. There is a deeply rooted combination between sex and evil.  This essay will develop this idea in depth by focusing on Iago of Othello and Edmund of

Shakespeare's King Lear - Suffering of Cordelia in King Lear

1503 words - 6 pages of loyal obedience. He recognises the authority in Lear and relates to it by selfless devotion. In his confrontation with Lear over Cordelia's disinheritance, Kent shows the same adamancy as the King. He has the strength to speak out boldly, not the strength for powerful or effective action in life. Out of his affection for Cordelia and the King he transgresses his natural role in the court and denounces Lear's action as madness. &nbsp

Kingship and Leadership in William Shakespeare's King Lear

2291 words - 9 pages Kingship and Leadership in William Shakespeare's King Lear Jonathon Dollimore (1984) focuses on Lear’s identity throughout the play. ‘What makes Lear the person he is, is not kingly essence, but among other things, his authority and his family. As the play progresses Lear is forced to question his identity. “Does anyone hear know me?…Who is it that can tell me who I am?”. Dollimore believes King Lear is about

Feminine Evil in William Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear

1295 words - 5 pages Feminine Evil in William Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear In Shakespeare's plays King Lear and Macbeth, evil is represented in both women and men. It is significant to the plots of both plays and to their impact through theme and character that evil actions are performed by women. The construction of evil female characters also gives insight into Shakespeare's view of women and their roles in society. The plot of King Lear is set in

Confrontations Between Young and Old in Shakespeare's King Lear

1901 words - 8 pages Confrontations Between Young and Old in King Lear       One of the underlying themes in Shakespeare's play, King Lear is the concept of the generation gap.  This gap is mainly illustrated between the family.  The older generation is Lear himself, and the younger generation consists of his daughters Goneril, Regan and Cordelia.  In the second plot of the play, Gloucester represents the older generation, and his sons

The Battle Between Materialism and Spirituality in Shakespeare's King Lear

930 words - 4 pages , he believed that the greatest gift he could leave his daughters after his death was his kingdom, his life’s work and pride. King Lear’s materialistic view of the world is most clearly justified by his role in society as a member of the nobility. Because Lear possesses a large amount of wealth, he subconsciously attributes material objects as the supreme force of the universe, however, as Lear soon discovers, material objects cannot be equated

Unchecked Power in Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear

1470 words - 6 pages between the tragic heroes in Macbeth and King Lear. However, the differences between the two outline the re-occurring themes in both plays. In Shakespeare's plays the central characters' own weaknesses and lust for power lead to corruption. The unchecked power in Shakespeare's Macbeth and King Lear ultimately leads to corruption, tragedy, and the hero's fall from grace.In Macbeth, Macbeth's power goes unchecked within himself, his wife, and within

Essay on Blame in Shakespeare's King Lear

580 words - 2 pages King Lear is To Blame   In William Shakespeare's play, "King Lear", the main character, King Lear, claims to be "a man more sinned against than sinning"(3.2.60-61). Though a good king, King Lear's own actions cause his family and kingdom to fall apart. The sins committed against King Lear are a result of his personal faults of rashness, blindness, and foolishness.   King Lear's hot temper and hasty decisions play a

Fool in William Shakespeare's King Lear

1739 words - 7 pages Fool in William Shakespeare's King Lear The Fool’s function in King Lear is to create emphasis on the tragedy in the play and give insight into the characters’ true nature. He shows other characters’ nature though blunt comments and earns himself the name of ‘all-licensed Fool’, as he clearly states peoples’ inner personality. He develops the tragedy though a theme of madness and instability, from his use of

Similar Essays

Shakespeare's King Lear Goneril And Cordelia In King Lear

952 words - 4 pages The Characters of Goneril and Cordelia in King Lear   Nothing makes a story like a good villain, or in this case, good villainess. They are the people we love to hate and yearn to watch burn. Goneril, of Shakespeare’s King Lear, is no exception. Her evils flamed from the very beginning of the play with her lack of sincerity in professing her love for her father: "Sir, I love you more than word can wield the matter; Dearer than

Comparing Lear And Gloucester In Shakespeare's King Lear

1928 words - 8 pages      In Shakespeare's classic tragedy, King Lear, there are several characters who do not see the reality of their situation. Two such characters are Lear and Gloucester. Both characters exhibit a blindness to the world around them. Lear does not see clearly the truth of his daughters mentions, while Gloucester is also blinded by Edmond's treachery. This failure to see reality leads to Lear's intellectual blindness, which is his insanity, and

Transformation Of Lear In Shakespeare's King Lear

1714 words - 7 pages ?” (3.4.28-32). Lear is realizing that he is not the only one who is suffering, his people are as well. He recognizes that he is selfish and that as king he could have helped them suffer less and he did nothing. Lear understands his faults and is beginning to accept that he has a great many mistakes. Through recognition of his flaws Lear is now learning to accept and admit them. While in the presence of Edgar and Kent, Lear delivers an unprompted

Catahrsis In Shakespeare's King Lear Essay

916 words - 4 pages as the deaths of Lear, Edmund and the two evil sisters. According to Aristotle ?Tragedy should arouse the emotions of pity and fear, but in a healthy and balanced proportion.? King Lear does not fit into the Aristotle model of tragedy. According to Aristotle a tragic play should leave the audience free of stressed emotions and feelings at the end.The sense of catharsis in King Lear can be seen from a different perspective if each character is