This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Adam Smith V. Karl Marx Essay

2229 words - 9 pages

Adam Smith v. Karl Marx

Being reared in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier for me to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, "Communism looks good on paper, but in practice, it is completely ineffective." Historically, this form of government does not tend to succeed because of many factors. Some of these include basic economic differences, individualism, and technology and how it advances or serves as a detriment to the state. My stance is clear: I believe that Adam Smith has the more credible stance. Beginning with the economic side of the discussion Smith takes a Western approach in his thought processes. He states in so many words that workers are continually looking for the best job and the best wage. Marx believes that a wage-labor war will break down society and cause a downfall of the economic structure. The Capitalist belief is that each individual is continually exerting himself to find the most advantageous employment for whatever capital he can command (Smith 15). Smith says also in paragraph 15 that it is human nature for a person to better society while bettering himself. In Adam's opinion each person has the right to the pursuit of happiness, and that each person has to take it in their own hands to advance within society. Marx disagrees by saying that when a person betters himself he does not improve but instead endangers society. For example, when the bourgeois cuts employment because of technology, the bourgeois hurts society by "…instead of rising the laborers with the progress of industry, sinks them deeper below the conditions of existence of their own class" (Marx 49). "We Communist have been reproached with the desire of abolishing the right of personally acquiring property as the fruit of a man's own labor, which property is alleged to be the groundwork of all personal freedom, activity and independence" (Marx 55). In the Constitution under which we live as Capitalist says that each citizen has the right to personal property, Communism goes against everything that the American society is based on, which in my opinion is wrong and unjust. "…Differences of age and sex have no longer any distinctive social validity for the working class. All are instruments of labor, more or less expensive to use, according to their age and sex" (Marx 31). From this quote he takes away the freedom of expression that we live under in the United States. Marx makes everyone out to be the same with no one having special abilities or personalities. In my opinion Marx and Communism are wrong by saying that everyone is the same and no one is any different than the next. Being a Christian I believe that everyone is different and special, the lack of diversity in the population makes it difficult for progress to advance and to stay ahead of the competition. In Adam's idea of society each person can...

Find Another Essay On Adam Smith v. Karl Marx

A Comparison of the Economic Theories of Adam Smith and Karl Marx

2467 words - 10 pages There is perhaps not a more famous ongoing dialectic argument in the field of political economy than the one between Adam Smith and Karl Marx in regards to capitalism. The two thinkers, although coming to radically different conclusions about the outcomes of the capitalist system for all parties involved, agree on a surprising number of ideas such as labor being the source of commodities’ value, as well as the fact that the division of labor

Economis Theorists- Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes and their contributions to the field of economics

597 words - 2 pages Throughout the centuries, there have been many economists, who have contributed to the many economic theories. Among them is Adam Smith, also known as the Father of Capitalism. His theory on beneficial workings of the free marketplace and his 1776 Wealth of Nations is what he is most noted for. Karl Marx, the Father of Communism, is most famous for his theory on the conflict within capitalism. There is also John Maynard Keynes, who is known as

Small Element, Big Difference: A comparison of Adam Smith and Karl Marx's view on labor in a capitalist society

1721 words - 7 pages Adam Smith and Karl Marx are both considered few of the most influential giants in social and economical history. When viewing their economical standpoints, it is not difficult to recognize the difference in ideas that they have regarding society. Adam Smith is an advocator for capitalism and the wealth that can be accumulated in it, while Karl Marx critiques on the flaws of capitalism and praises communism that will overthrow the capitalist

Karl Marx

1195 words - 5 pages trade and the world market. In 1859, Marx was able to publish Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, his first serious economic work. In his journalistic work of this period, Marx championed the Union cause in the American Civil War. In the early 1860s he worked on composing three large volumes, the Theories of Surplus Value, which discussed the theoreticians of political economy, particularly Adam Smith and David Ricardo. In 1867, well

The Socio-Economic Link Between Town and Country

1672 words - 7 pages Nowadays, nine tenth of the global population are residents of cities. This implies that urbanization reduced modern world to a state where the vast majority of population dwells in the urban areas. Nevertheless, peripheral regions constitute a substantial segment of a state`s socio-economic pattern. One of the most prominent philosophers of the nineteenth century, Karl Marx, in his extraordinary 1848 political treatise The

Economic Systems: Capitalism

1315 words - 6 pages interfere with trade. Individual markets raise or lower their prices due to competition and demand for goods. There has been a lot of debate over the usefulness of capitalism. Some believed capitalism had negative effects while others saw more benefits. Adam Smith and Andrew Carnegie pushed for a capitalistic society, but had different beliefs on how economic wealth should be distributed; Karl Marx advocated for a communistic society where wealth

The Canadian Economy- Smith or Marx Theory?

1256 words - 5 pages The economic concepts that were visualized by Adam Smith and Karl Marx lead to the idea that Canada fits towards both quite well. Their concepts are reflected quite clearly in the economic situation of Canada, and the theories of both can be applied. In a way, both Marx and Smith would be pleased with the economy of Canada, as it lends to their ideas and presents a positive economy for Canadian residents. While some may argue that Canadian

Historical Theory of the Communist Manifesto

988 words - 4 pages new society with no social classes and private property. They opposed the ideas of Adam Smith and The Wealth Of Nations. Smith largely believed in an “invisible hand” government in the management of the economy. Marx believed that capitalists took advantage of the laborers and gave too much in technology. This would eventually lead to the collapse of the economy. Marx and Engels believed communism to be the answer to these problems. By

The Revolution of 1848 and Karl Marx's The Communist Manifesto

1612 words - 6 pages felt that it would put serious pressure on the government, and in the end they would fold, allowing people to be in charge and rule. These ideas of Karl Marx were very different from the ideas of Adam Smith in his Wealth of Nations. In this document Smith believed that capitalists should be able to exploit workers because Smith believed in Laize Faire ruling, which meant that the government should not involve themselves in the

Ideal Ideal: Comparison, Contrast, and Synthesis of Marxist Socialism and Adam Smith's Capitalist ideals

1801 words - 7 pages , discussed, and written about by countless authors but no literature has been so widely regarded as not just groundbreaking, but epic in its influence as the writings of Adam Smith, and the combined efforts of Karl Marx and Frederick Engels. In An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations Adam Smith discusses a number of the benefits of Capitalism while Marx and Engels use The Communist Manifesto to express their shared disdain for the

Karl Marx and His Radical Views

1255 words - 5 pages history. [i] <http://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/photo/marx/pages/82km1.htm> [ii] “What are the Major Themes of the Humanities Base?,” Humanities Base Resource Page, <http://www.as.udayton.edu/hbase/themes.htm> [iii] Webster’s New World Dictionary and Thesaurus, s. v. “evolution”. [iv] World Book Encyclopedia, 20th ed., s.v. “Marx, Karl.” [v] David McLellan. Karl Marx: His Life and Thought (New York: Harper and Row

Similar Essays

Adam Smith Vs. Karl Marx Essay

955 words - 4 pages Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx, living in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, Communism looks good on the outside.Adam Smith states his opinion on the mercantile system and its faults, while he dissected, clarified, and revolutionized the mercantilist economy and

Comparing Adam Smith And Karl Marx

562 words - 2 pages Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land

Viewpoints Of Durkhiem, Karl Marx, And Adam Smith

790 words - 4 pages keeps the classes where they are. People cannot rise the through the class system. The division of labor is a way of “social control” of the status hierarchy. ADAM SMITH: Adam smith is a good medium of Durkheim and Marx. Adam understood that for a nation, productivity is everything. A lot of productivity occurring within a nation correlates to a lot happening in it. Things are being made and sold because things are needed for different things

A Comparison Of The Economic Philosophies Of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, And Karl Marx

1811 words - 7 pages As far back as man has been on earth, he has been driven towards building a community among his peers. Whether that is a community of hunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same