Adversarial Justice System Essay

736 words - 3 pages

The adversarial justice system is what makes up the law system in common law countries such as the United States. It relies on the skill of each lawyer representing his or her party's positions and involves a neutral third party, such as a jury, trying to determine the truth of the case. The adversarial system is a two-sided structure in which criminal trial courts prosecute against the defense. Justice is done when the most successful party is able to convince the judge/jury that his/her perception on the case is the correct one. Any criminal who needs to appear in the United States justice system would be wise to use the adversarial justice system.The advantage of having the adversarial justice system allows the defendant to be judged by a jury of his peers rather than the inquisitorial system where he is only able to state his case to the judge himself. One of the biggest advantages in the adversarial system it allows for a debate between both parties to present their side of their case. With the adversarial system many resources come into play for the attorneys’ to represent their clients. Key witness, expert testimony, evidence, and probable cause can help prove the innocent or guilt of the accuse parties. Each side has the opportunity to present an argument with the evidence to convince the judge or jury to convict the criminal or to not. It is appropriate and theoretically because of the evidence that the lawyer determines the fate of the defendant. The actual result of any trial is dependent on the fairness of the judge and his ruling which could tip the balance one way or the other in spite of the evidence.Although there any many advantages of the adversarial system there are also many disadvantages as well. One of the main disadvantages of the adversarial system is that it’s slow. The judge can’t speed up the trail and it often causes the trials to end up taking longer than they should, sometimes resulting in trails taking days, weeks, months and possibly years. The jury could end up not being able to agree on whether or not if one is or isn’t innocent and the trial could end up being dismissed to a later date. This can cause the final decision of the trail to take years and end up costing everyone a lot of time and money. Another disadvantage is as stated in the Miranda rights “if you cannot afford a lawyer one will be appointed to you”, which in the end could cause you to have an inexperienced lawyer...

Find Another Essay On Adversarial Justice System

Adversarial System Essay

1240 words - 5 pages of events is true. If the prosecutor convinces the jury “beyond a reasonable doubt” then the accused is found guilty of the crime. Inversely if the defence is able to raise reasonable doubt the accused is found not guilty. The adversarial system in Australia includes five central features to support in the equality and justice of the system. The conduct of the litigation both prior to and during the trial is left substantially in the hands of the

Hong Kong Magistrates trials are more inquisitorial than adversarial. Discuss

1915 words - 8 pages Hong Kong Magistrates Trials are more inquisitorial than adversarialWhen an offence has been committed there is a moral and social obligation that the perpetrator be tried and convicted. Every criminal justice system has devised a mechanism to bring about this desired effect. The hypothesis here demands an investigation of the two modes of trial that are implemented in the 'democratic' world and whether the system employed in the Hong Kong

Comparing a Aboriginal and Australian Justice Systems

1486 words - 6 pages Interrelationship : Aboriginal & Australian justice system : The recognition of aboriginal customary laws under the Australian Criminal justice system is just confined to acknowledgement of just the traditional physical punishments at the stage of sentencing. It all depends upon the interpretation and readings of individuals who play a role in the Criminal justice system in the capacity of judicial officers, officers of the court, lawyers and

Australian adversary system

2172 words - 9 pages and French in the 11th century and the French again in the 19th, And Adolf Hitler in the 20th century.LawyersThe Adversarial system gives total control to trial lawyers who are more concerned about winning then delivering justice. Because the facts need to be fabricated sometimes, it deceives the community. When their are two lawyers in a criminal trial who do not have the same skills the Adversary system greatly benefits the lawyer with better

Undertake a critical analysis of Dispute Resolution in satisfying the objective of access to justice

940 words - 4 pages reforms have clearly had an effect on the way in which lawyers conduct litigation. There has been a move away from the adversarial attitude to one of greater co-operation. This is encouraged by the pre-actions protocols, which the parties have to use, and which encourage early disclosure of information between the parties. As a result fewer claims are being issued in courtAlso there was a review of the criminal justice system, by Lord Justice Auld who

The Impact of Formalising Plea Bargaining on Justice and Equality in the English Legal System

4139 words - 17 pages where the state must generate facts to give good reason for punishing the accused is substituted by admissions of guilt from the accused which, because they will be claimed to be open, taken without pressure and voluntary, presents the basis for the entry of a conviction. To model the system of criminal justice of England and Wales upon the non-adversarial principles fixed in the American practice would, therefore

Features of The Litigation and Mediation Process

931 words - 4 pages features of litigation which have a variety of effects on the parties of a dispute. Litigation, otherwise known as Legal Disputation, are civil legal proceedings in a court between contesting parties, in which the plaintiff commences an action in which a court is asked to determine the dispute between the plaintiff and the defendant or defendants. The rules and basis that governs litigation is the adversarial system of trial, which involves two

Crime Control

1219 words - 5 pages For a long time, the law enforcement agents and the judicial systems have been using the crime control and the due process models in an effort to establish and maintain justice in the society. In as much as these two models operate hand in hand, they both have similarities as well as several differences in how they operate in the judicial system. They are very effective in the judicial system because they both work towards providing justice

Analysis of Criminal Justice Approaches and the Impact of Media

1656 words - 7 pages judges (Elliot, 2012, p.341). Fundamentally, criminal law prohibits any actions that are deemed to be detrimental to the community, with certain punishments attached when they are broken (Griffith, 2011, p.15). These laws are established by the government and any acts contrary to its definition signify an offence, or a violation against the state. Further, the criminal justice system in Canada is known as an adversarial system, where justice can be

The Adversary Legal System In Australia

1217 words - 5 pages of the decision maker in the adversarial system and strict rules of evidence and procedure can be said to be too strict for all the truth to be uncovered and confusing for the jury. On the other hand, the alternative, as they have in the inquisitorial system is unfeasible. But to say the adversarial system provides justice continues to evolve through trial and debate

The Adversarial System

2280 words - 9 pages Introduction In the discussion which follows, the function served by ‘evidence’ within the adversarial system will be considered. The central importance of relevance to the admissibility of evidence will be linked to the purpose served by the tribunal of fact. The range of factors which impact on the criminal justice system will act as a basis to consider the justification for the exclusion of certain evidential material. Developments in

Similar Essays

The Adversarial System Essay

1198 words - 5 pages questions this paper will take into consideration are: Is the adversarial system the best way to achieve justice in the criminal courts of the United States; what those limitations are; how those limitations deliver justice; alternatives to the adversarial system; and the advantages or disadvantages of those alternatives.Achieving JusticeWhen confronted with the issue of the best method to achieving justice in criminal court proceedings; one must

The Italian And English Legal Systems

1423 words - 6 pages : Accessed on 09/11/11]. Johnstone, H. and Jones, M. (2008) History of criminal justice,4th ed. Waltham: Elsevier, p.67-70. Jonakait, R. (2008) The rise of the American adversary system: America before England, Widner Law review, 14(1), p.656. Koppen, J. and Penrod, S. (2003) Adversarial versus inquisitorial justice: psychological perspective on criminal justice systems, USA: Springer, p.29. Malleson, K. (2007) the legal system, New York

The Adversarial Nature Of The Trial Provides An Effective Means Of Getting To The Truth Of What Happened?. Discuss.

2089 words - 9 pages The main aim of the Justice System is to obtain the truth and enforce laws, statutes and legislation created by the government. However some would argue that some legal procedures in some countries are not as efficient as others at find the truth of what actually happened. The two systems which are constantly being analysed is the Adversarial and the Inquisitorial procedure which both have supporters and critiques, advantages and

Deffense Attorneys Essay

1672 words - 7 pages unknown. If Jeff simply pursued what was in front of him as a prosecutor, he would have won the case but lost in the pursuit of justice. Some critics, including POSC 130g Teaching Assistant Simon Radford, argue that in the America’s system of adversarial legalism, lawyers are not intended to pursue the truth, as evidenced by the gamesmanship nature of evidence rules that often results in arbitrary rules allowing criminals to “walk” (Radford 2013