Affirmative Action Is Not Reverse Discrimination

1298 words - 5 pages

Affirmative Action is Not Reverse Discrimination

Affirmative Action is not meant to help blacks because of the color of their skin, but because they deserve compensation for past and continuing injustices. Opponents may criticize the wisdom of how this compensation is meted out, but they cannot question the principle of compensatory damages, which enjoys a long tradition in our society.

To many opponents of affirmative action, a color-blind society should not discriminate at hiring time on the basis of color, sex, etc. This would make the preferential hiring of blacks just as wrong as preferential hiring of whites.

Furthermore, opponents claim, the introduction of past injustices does not change this logic. If blacks were mistreated in the past for a morally irrelevant characteristic (being black), then to give them preferential treatment for the same morally irrelevant characteristic is equally indefensible.

There is an error of logic here: the premise is faulty. Preferential treatment is not being given to blacks because they are black. They are being given preferential treatment because they have been mistreated. And society has a long and approved tradition of awarding compensatory damages to victims of mistreatment.

To put it another way, blacks came by their current disadvantage for two reasons:

1. Whites decided that a morally irrelevant feature (having black skin) was in fact a morally relevant feature.

2. Whites mistreated blacks on that basis.

Affirmative action does not justify preferential treatment based on the first point; it justifies it on the second. That is, supporters do not believe that being black is a morally relevant feature which deserves discriminatory behavior; but they do believe that injustices based on that mistake should be compensated. Being black is only morally relevant in that it was used to justify the original sin.

The situation is akin to the Jews who survived the Holocaust. Germany paid a large sum in compensatory damages to the state of Israel after World War II, and no one decried this as reverse racial discrimination.

Now, opponents of affirmative action may question whether affirmative action is the right way to go about correcting past and present injustice. For example, can we compensate the living for sins committed against their ancestors? Is it right to compensate groups instead of specifically harmed individuals? But these are separate issues, ones that should be addressed elsewhere. (The reader may find them in the next essay.) The point here is that affirmative action is intended not as reverse discrimination, but as compensatory damages for injustice.

Moral absolutism

Those who use the term "reverse descrimination" are actually engaging in moral absolutism, a completely unworkable concept that has never been practiced by any society in history. An example may best highlight its difficulties. Suppose our society passed a law that says,...

Find Another Essay On Affirmative Action is Not Reverse Discrimination

Affirmative Action is Discrimination Essay

1071 words - 4 pages Affirmative action is wrong and will not help solve the problems minorities face.  The reason it is wrong is because it's discrimination.  It has no place in today's society in today's society because it does more bad than good.  In addition to that most people don't enjoy the presence of affirmative action.  Also, it appears that affirmative action can actually be detrimental to employees health.    &nbsp

Affirmative Action is Racial Discrimination Essay

2776 words - 11 pages Affirmative Action as Racial Discrimination The controversy over affirmative action is growing to embody most all selective decisions in American society. From public protection to college admissions, people are becoming resentful of such affirmative action programs. The applicability of these programs in today's American society has been challenged by people ranging from the everyday "Joe", who is finding reverse discrimination in the

Affirmative Action Is Positive Discrimination

663 words - 3 pages Affirmative action commonly means giving special treatment to certain people such as minorities and women to correct past discrimination against these groups by increasing recruitment, promotions, retention and on-the-job training by removing barriers to admission to universities and educational establishments. Affirmative Action is sometimes thought of as “positive discrimination”. Affirmative Action may seem like it is only positive, but it

Discrimination and Affirmative Action

3024 words - 12 pages discrimination. In theory compensatory justice would make sense utilizing the actual groups involved in the actual incidents of discrimination. However, this argument breaks down as individuals are rewarded and punished for actions they were not involved in (Dr. Gold's Response).Reverse discrimination is also a flawed argument form a deontological perspective as it can be justified from different aspect for conflicting purposes. Affirmative Action

Affirmative Action Is Not the Solution

1350 words - 5 pages considered just? In this case not only would affirmative action be serving an injustice to the white individual, but it would also help create a loophole by indirectly establishing a legal form of discrimination.      The counterpoint to this argument is that although affirmative action creates a larger obstacle for white men to achieve, such measures are necessary in order to break the cycle of de facto employment and

Affirmative Action is Not the Answer

891 words - 4 pages Affirmative Action is Not the Answer        Created in the 1960's, affirmative action programs attempted to undo past racial discrimination by giving preference to blacks and other minorities.  The idea behind these programs was to help minorities gain the representation in the job market that paralleled their percentage of the population (Finley 1).  Unfortunately, affirmative action has mutated into a thirty-year

Affirmative Action is Discrimination in a New Form

1793 words - 7 pages is now time to apply new moral threats, not towards the employers and colleges but towards the government. For it is the government that needs to change its polices. The government needs to take action towards the real problems of equality: poverty, not the bad white man from the past. Affirmative action is simply the same old discrimination in reverse.

Affirmative Action Promotes Discrimination in America

1927 words - 8 pages Reverse Discrimination: The Impact of Affirmative Action on Whites 2003). Instead of giving equal opportunity to everyone, prejudice has become the result of affirmative action. When it comes to colleges and workplaces achieving racial diversity, affirmative action does its job quite well. This is a desirable characteristic for many institutions of today. However, this should not be used as justification for unfairness and defiance of

We Do NOT Need Affirmative Action

639 words - 3 pages minorities. There are also gaps in family income, unemployment, and the percent of people that are living in poverty. Most minorities are living below the poverty line. There have not been any studies that can conclusively say what is the cause of the educational gaps. We can not say if economic gaps or discrimination caused our in disparities. Affirmative Action goes against what our country was founded on. Our preamble to the

Affirmative Action Should Not Be Continued

2536 words - 10 pages . Affirmative action was a good jump start to get our nation to where it is today. However, affirmative action should not be continued because it is a form of discrimination, it is more harmful than helpful, and it supplements race or gender for one’s qualification. The government thinks that implementing affirmative action will repair inequality, but it cannot. In the midst of tying to promote equality, they are promoting discrimination

Affirmative Action: A Road to Discrimination and Prejudice

2257 words - 9 pages something is not to just reverse the way it is done. This has only led to a new type of discrimination and further prejudices. It is time for us to admit that any benefits from affirmative action are far outweighed by the perception that the success of minorities and women is unearned and that favoring members of one group over another simply goes against the ethical ideal of America. References Billingsley, K.L. (2003). Affirmative Action is

Similar Essays

Affirmative Action Is Not Reverse Discrimination

2075 words - 8 pages Affirmative action is not the source of discrimination, but the vehicle for removing the effects of discrimination. The Labor Department report found less than 100 reverse discrimination cases among more than 3,000 discrimination opinions by the U.S. District Court and the Court of Appeal between 1990 and 1994. Discrimination was established in only six cases. The report found that, “Many of the cases were the result of a disappointed

Affirmative Action Is Reverse Discrimination Essay

2770 words - 11 pages , affirmative action is in fact helping the majority of people in a society, and according to the principle of utilitarianism, it is just because it leads to the result of "the greatest good of the greatest number", different from reverse discrimination, it should be considered as an alternative to correct discrimination.3.0 Arguments against "Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination"1. From the principle of justice view, affirmative action is not

Affirmative Action Is Reverse Discrimination Essay

2420 words - 10 pages Affirmative Action is Reverse Discrimination Even though slavery has not been a part of America for over a century now, racial discrimination still exists in various parts of our culture. A controversial policy known as affirmative action was introduced in the 1960's to try and promote racial equality in society. Affirmative action is supposed to give minorities an equal chance in life by requiring minority employment, promotions, college

Reverse Discrimination And Affirmative Action Essay

542 words - 2 pages produces illegal quotas, gives favored treatment to minorities, or if this is indeed a reverse discrimination against whites.Those in favor of affirmative action believe this policy is necessary in establishing an equal society in the United States. They argue that this program makes it less of a competition between whites and minorities. They argue also that it is reparation for past miss deeds. They make and cases for the fact that many