All men are created equal. All men are born with the same unalienable rights, those which cannot be given or taken away. Because of this, it is apparent that one man has no more rights than another, but earned privileges. If a man works forty years of his life in a factory and can feed his family with the money he earns is that a right because he is Caucasian? If a Hispanic man does not work, and cannot feed his family is that unfair treatment? Affirmative Action Laws should be eliminated because they discriminate the Caucasian majority, contradict the Civil Rights Act, and oppose the Bible.
The Civil Rights Act of 1964 was established to ensure equality of opportunity and treatment among men, regardless of race. The Affirmative Action Laws administer employers to use a selection process when hiring, which concerns race (Scholars). Seemingly contradicting the intentions of the Civil Rights Act, the laws enforce a diverse workplace, without notice of ability. In the late 1970’s reverse discrimination became an issue.
Regardless of its good intentions, the Affirmative Action Laws began to influence the judgment of those with power to make decisions. In 2003, the Supreme Court argued a case when the University of Michigan Law School denied admission to Barbara Grutter, Caucasian. The university accepted a minority student with lower scores. The District Court found the law school’s use of race unlawful, but the decision was reversed. The use of race in admissions decisions to further a compelling interest in obtaining the educational benefits that come from a diverse student body is not prohibited by the Equal Protection Clause (Grutter). There was a great deal of controversy about the decision made.
In the same way, there is also controversy about weather or not the Bible supports the idea that all men are created equal. While the disciple Paul was speaking to the Greeks, he stated, “And hath made of ONE BLOOD all nations of MEN for to dwell on all the fact of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation..." (Acts). This reinforces the idea that God intended for all men to have equal opportunity, because he made them all from the same blood, no one kind better than another. Man has begun to separate people, but in all fairness, rights are unalienable and with that, no man of any race has any more rights than another, the Ayn Rand Column states, “ Since Man has inalienable rights, this means that the same rights are held, individually, by every man, by all men, at all times. Therefore, the rights of one man cannot and must not violate the rights of another” (Rand). With the exception of physical force, this proposes the idea that one man cannot control another. Regarding minorities, this opposition suggests that because of ones skin color, opportunity is not limited. Men earn what they are given. With sufficient effort put forth,...