Against Affirmative Action By Jumbo Moos Why Aa Hinders The Non Minority And The Minority By Putting Them In A Job They Are Less/Not Qualified For.

596 words - 2 pages

Against Affirmative ActionFor many years, colleges relied on the 1978 Supreme Court ruling to justify their affirmative action programs, but in recent years, that affirmative action standard from that ruling has been chipped slowly away by lawsuits; in addition, the public opinion of affirmative action has become increasingly hostile. Despite this trend, affirmative action still exists in today's colleges. I find it extreamly irritating that I may not get into a college that I am completely qualified for because some nitwit who barely passed high school is the 'right' minority.Supporters claim affirmative action to either 'make up for' previous wrongs or to end discrimination, making college admission equal for everyone. But the idea of affirmative action itself is discriminatory. Keeping affirmative action recognizes that there is a difference between races and discriminates against those that aren't of a certain minority. Colleges claim to seek 'diversity.' But what good is diversity without justice?Affirmative action acknowledges a difference between races. If there isn't a difference between blacks and whites, then why do blacks get a boost into college? To me this says that blacks aren't capable of getting themselves into college without a crutch. It says that blacks are unequal to whites, and therefor need a crutch. We all know this is untrue; any black american is capable of doing anything a white american can. The only reason there are more whites in college is because they are have better schooling before college; that is the root of the problem. So change the schools. Allowing less qualified students to enter college will not help them. They are not prepared for the rigors of whatever college they got into because they did not do the work in high...

Find Another Essay On Against Affirmative Action by JumboMoos Why AA hinders the non-minority and the minority by putting them in a job they are less/not qualified for.

Arguments for and Against Affirmative Action

1161 words - 5 pages staff writer for The Christian Science Monitor is that it "violates the 14th Amendment and the Civil Rights Act." It is said that the 14th Amendment does not allow this form of preferential treatment in any case noting that "no person shall be denied the equal protection of the laws."(3) The same individuals wonder after a level playing field has been made, what the purpose is of Affirmative Action. How can a program that is said to foster a

The nature of disadvantage encountered by minority groups, the legal and non-legal means adopted to address that disadvantage and the limitations those measures have in addressing the disadvantage

1527 words - 6 pages Many legal and non-legal means have been adopted in order to eliminate disadvantages faced by Youth, the Aged and people of differing sexuality in Australia. Although many of these measures have been imposed for the overall well being of these groups, it is however undeniable that the measures fail to adequately address the full extent of these disadvantages. Young people in general are considered to be vulnerable and often unable to understand

Against Affirmative Action

825 words - 3 pages hires anyone because he or she is a minority, even if someone else is more qualified to do the job, it is discrimination. In eight University of California campuses where affirmative action is no longer implemented the enrollment of black students only declined by 17% and the enrollment of Hispanics declined only by 6.9%. Even without the use of it, minorities are still getting into colleges. There is no need for discriminatory programs

The War Against Terror and China's Treatment of the Uigher Ethnic Minority

3773 words - 15 pages over the “exporting” of Xinjiang’s natural resources is compounded by the use of the territory by the military and police. Xinjiang, which accounts for one-sixth of the land area of the PRC, is termed China’s Gulag for the abundance of labor-reform camps there, and the deserts of Lop Nor are a favorite of the Chinese for nuclear weapons testing.[4] Another source of contention is the economic gap between the Uigher and Han populations in

Against Affirmative Action

896 words - 4 pages , employment, and job training. I think that affirmative action has given some the opportunities that did not exist without it. I would like to see diversity and everyone being treated as an equal. Whether of different race, ethnic background, or gender, people deserve to be treated fairly and their unalienable rights should not be violated. I am for desegregation in every aspect of this world, but I am not for separation in the form of special privileges or rights, especially for those who are undeserving. The service of affirmative action has been provided and additional usage may cause problems in the future.

Affirmative Action is Not the Answer

891 words - 4 pages birthright, should determine who prospers and who does not" (Roberts 32).           This leads to a series of problems at universities.  For example, we cannot expect college students to see everyone equally unless everyone is considered equal when applying for college.  Affirmative action has created a situation in which the minority's "society now tells them that if they will only designate themselves as black on their

Affirmative Action Is Not the Solution

1350 words - 5 pages      Affirmative action is a social policy created to promote the welfare of minorities by supporting the idea that individuals are all created equal and should not be judged by race or gender. Therefore, in situations like job and university applications, we should consider minorities to be as feasible a choice for hire as a white male candidate, taking into consideration their background. In short, it tries to give

Case Against Affirmative Action

1877 words - 8 pages A very prevalent topic these days, whether in the workplace or at a college, is affirmative action. Many people are Pro-affirmative action, and many are against. I,for one, am against it. I believe that affirmative action creates a lower standard to those of minority groups, and encourages them to think they deserve what they have not earned. I also think affirmative actions takes away from those white males who have worked twice as hard and

Against Affirmative Action in College Admissions

564 words - 2 pages to do with any of the racial atrocities that took place in the past. Two wrongs have never made a right before. Why should they in this case? It is true that prejudice still exists, but it is extremely minimal compared to what it once was.In fact, affirmative action itself creates more prejudice than was there to begin with. For example, some people will purposely avoid minority doctors in order to ensure that they are not being medically advised

Against Affirmative Action in College Admissions

1573 words - 6 pages 3.2 would not be admitted into the University of Michigan. However, a minority (black or Hispanic) student with the same SAT score and GPA would be recommended for admission (Sanchez). If the ruling goes in Gratz's favor, this case will be hailed by opponents of affirmative action as the most important step towards equality in colleges and universities. The only way to treat college admissions without preferential treatment is to look at

Analysis of the arguments for and against Affirmative Action (Issue #10, Stanley Feingold, George McKenna, "Taking Sides" 13th ed.)

1878 words - 8 pages problems due to this discrimination and it's effects on the black community. One solution to the problem of past discrimination and racial inequality has been to take "Affirmative Action" with regard to minority races in America, enforcing certain levels of opportunity mandated for minority groups, most notably black African Americans. McKenna and Feingold's "Taking Sides" dedicates a section to this debate of whether or not affirmative action

Similar Essays

Pro Affirmative: Benefits For The Minority Essay

905 words - 4 pages Affirmative Action is a program of opportunity; it is not a program of discrimination. This is the major argument people use in defending Affirmative Action. Whites claim they are now discriminated against because of this program and that minorities get the upper hand for the sake of filling a quota. However, Affirmative Action's mission is about opening up equal opportunity and ensuring equal opportunity with equal results.The most prominent

Are Newly Resident Migrant Groups And Non Citizens Entitled To The Minority Rights Protection Recognised By Current International Law?

1592 words - 7 pages party. This also means that when a non-citizen has ties to a host country, these family ties must not be interfered with unless it is for the greater good of the state. In terms of civil and political rights afforded to non-citizens and newly resident migrant groups, states are required to create opportunities for non-citizens to acquire citizenship without any form of discrimination. It has been said that states need to examine immigration policies they implement that may become discriminatory towards minority groups.

Affirmative Action Helps Qualified Minorities Essay

657 words - 3 pages their colleagues. Critics of affirmative action often evoke images of qualified white males being denied jobs so that lesser qualified women and minorities might have them, all in the name of racial and gender fairness. But this is one of the worst myths about affirmative action. Affirmative action works by determining what percentage of qualified women and minorities are available to a company, and then setting a goal for hiring that

Affirmative Action: Giving Preferential Admissions To Minority Students

1311 words - 5 pages minority will have the opportunity then to show how they are every bit capable. The more and more stereotypes are squashed then less need there will be for affirmative action policies and therefore, hopefully can be eliminated. On the other side of the table people claim that Affirmative action leads to reverse discrimination and does not pursue a real color-blind society. Affirmative action was set up to end discrimination but may in fact do the