Agent Alienation In Consequentialism Essay

1633 words - 7 pages

In “Consequentialism and Integrity,” Bernard Williams criticizes consequentialism on the ground that it is inherently unreasonable due to its insistence on negative responsibility, and as a result, denies the agent integrity. Peter Railton’s “Alienation, Consequentialism, and the Demands of Morality” is a response to Williams and a defense of consequentialism. In the following essay, I will explain Williams’s attack on consequentialism, and Railton’s argument that consequentialism need not deny the agent integrity. I will then consider an objection to Railton’s argument, and then evaluate a possible Railtonian response.

Williams identifies himself as a non-consequentialist not by offering a conflicting theory, but by pointing out the flaws of consequentialism. The crux of his argument is his rejection of what he calls negative responsibility: “for consequentialism, all casual connections are on the same level, and it makes no difference, so far as that goes, whether the causation of a given state of affairs lies through another agent, or not.”1 Williams posits that this insistence upon states of affairs reduces actors to causal nodes in a ‘state of affairs machine.’ To illustrate this point, he offers an example of Jim, a traveller lost in a South American jungle. Jim comes upon a town in which twenty of the residents are pressed against a wall, about to be executed by firing squad for daring to protest the government. The army captain present, Pedro, is unused to visitors, and being a hospitable man, offers Jim the opportunity to save the lives of nineteen of the villagers. However, to do so, Jim must take a gun and personally kill one of the residents.2

According to the consequentialist, the ethical solution to the aforementioned situation is that Jim ought to shoot one of the villagers. In doing so, he is preventing the deaths of the nineteen others; a failure to execute one would be morally akin to killing the nineteen. This is because the consequentialist is concerned only with the results: either one person dies, or twenty dies, regardless of who is causing the deaths. Wishing to dismiss any consequentialist certainty, Williams explores “what sort of considerations come into finding the answer” to Jim’s dilemma. He wishes to draw a distinction between “solely twenty Indians dead” and “Pedro’s killing twenty Indians” [emphasis added].3 This is Williams’s consideration of agent-relativity; namely, that to ascribe fault to Jim if he refuses “is to leave Pedro out of the picture in his essential role of one who has intentions and projects.”4 So this emphasis on states of affairs denies both Jim and Pedro the agency which is rightfully theirs; Pedro’s killing of the Indians is as much of a choice as Jim’s decision not to kill. This applies to all of consequentialist ethics; Williams states that it is absurd to ask anyone to deny the projects or actions which he or she holds as being the most important so that he...

Find Another Essay On Agent Alienation in Consequentialism

Virtue Theory Essay

2522 words - 10 pages see themselves as anti-theorists, rejecting theories that systematically attempt to capture and organize all matters of practical or ethical importance.Virtue ethics thus emerged as a rival account to deontology and consequentialism having developed from the dissatisfaction with the notion of moral actions, duty and obligation.It also arose in objection to the use of rigid moral rules and principles and their application to diverse and different

Four Normative Theories Which Help Guide Ethical Decision Making

2308 words - 9 pages scenario case given from the teacher’s perspective. Main Ethical Issue This scenario offers a plethora of complex situations; however the main ethical issue appears to surround the lack of safety, understanding and respect due to different cultural views, perspectives, values and needs of others. Consequentialism In Consequentialism, the moral worth of an action is chosen (to be right or wrong) based primarily on the consequences or

Ethics and Utilitarianism

1395 words - 6 pages theories became popular in the 18th century since it was quicker to morally asses actions without dealing with gut intuitions or a long list of questionable actions. Adding to that, there are three subdivisions that emerge from consequentialism: Ethical Egoism: an action sought to be morally right if the consequences of that action are thought to be more favorable than unfavorable only by the agent performing the action. Ethical Altruism: an

Objections to Rossian Pluralism Make It a More Valuable Moral Theory

1413 words - 6 pages . Virtue Ethics is another example of a pluralistic moral theory, but it faces a problem that Rossian Pluralism succeeds in addressing. Virtue Ethics states that the right thing to do is what a virtuous agent would do in that particular situation, and a virtuous agent can be identified by the fact that they possess the virtues. These virtues include benevolence (care for others), faithfulness (promise-keeping), honesty (truth-telling), and

Immanuel Kant's Ethics Of Pure Duty and John Stuart Mill's Utilitarian Ethics Of Justice

2730 words - 11 pages holds that right and wrong can only be assessed by the goodness of consequences. This general kind of theory can perhaps be most easily understood by considering the form of consequentialism. Consequentialism is that an act is right if, of those available to the agent at the time, it would produce the greatest overall net value in the end. Utilitarian views are based around the concept of attaining happiness and Mill maintains hedonism; happiness

Comparsion Of John Stewary Mill And Emanuel Kants Philosophies On Morality

2288 words - 10 pages an instance of a more general theory of right consequentialism, which holds that right and wrong can only be assessed by the goodness of consequences. This general kind of theory can perhaps be most easily understood by considering the form of consequentialism. Consequentialism is that an act is right if, of those available to the agent at the time, it would produce the greatest overall net value in the end. Utilitarian views are based around

Democracy and Political Obligation

4040 words - 16 pages done cannot be morally wrong, because it would be the object of a political obligation. On this point, I must agree with Nielsen's criticism of the ideas of the previously mentioned authors, with respect to the dirty hands dilemma. (3) But I cannot agree with the background of his ethical theory, which is an example of a consequentialism that must lead to the principle that in politics the ends sanctify the means. The difference between

Jeremy Bentham and John Mill's Classical Utilitarianism

1398 words - 6 pages In this essay I will analyse Jeremy Bentham and John Mill’s Classical Utilitarianism theory. I will present the objection that the expected impartiality of a moral agent is impractical and therefore seriously undermines the theory itself. This essay will focus on this opposition in order to determine whether or not such a theory can be salvaged through a possible modification. Classical Utilitarianism is an ethical theory which promotes the

Virtue ethics IA

1007 words - 5 pages Virtue ethics is currently one of three major approaches in normative ethics. It may, initially, be identified as the one that emphasizes the virtues, or moral character, in contrast to the approach which emphasizes duties or rules (deontology) or that which emphasizes the consequences of actions (consequentialism). Suppose it is obvious that someone in need should be helped. A utilitarian will point to the fact that the consequences of doing so

The Bundle Theory by David Hume

1642 words - 7 pages is their own moral agent and therefore an authority in the determination of what is right and what is wrong. What a person holds to be right and wrong should be used in every situation in order for one to act according to their duty. The objectivity of the categorical imperative is justified by the fact that everybody’s reality is constructed by how they perceive the world; because of this, everybody shares an essential aspect of experience and

Workplace Alienation

1483 words - 6 pages Throughout my work experience I have been a witness to various degrees of work alienation. As I continue to gather additional experience in the work environment and engage in discussions with fellow employees, it is clearly evident that there is workplace discontentment and feelings of being taken advantage of. Based on my work experiences to date, I agree with James Rinehart’s claim that forms of alienation are evident in the workplace

Similar Essays

R V. Dudley And Stephens Essay

1561 words - 7 pages In the case R v. Dudley and Stephens, the two sailors should not have been found guilty or charged with murder. I will examine the case with two theories of punishment, retributivism and consequentialism. I am using these two different frameworks because they both have two different requirements in order to justify punishment. Retributivism requires agents to be morally responsible, while consequentialism requires an agent to be rational. It is

Ethics Case Study

1458 words - 6 pages There are two main ethical issues that have been identified within this scenario. The first is that the acceptance of McJack’s sponsorship conflict with the schools recent efforts and policies to encourage healthy eating habits and lifestyles. Furthermore, if the school accepts the sponsorship offered in conjunction with the stipulated conditions it would ultimately be endorsing discrimination against Molly based on her appearance. The

Helping Molly Scenario Essay

1323 words - 5 pages consequences that may follow. Decisions are made with consideration to written and unwritten rules that fall under the subcategories of Natural Rights, Social Contract, Divine Command and Deontology. The Virtue Ethic and Care Ethic frameworks differ from those mentioned previously. Unlike Consequential and Non-Consequentialism, the Virtue and Care Ethic frameworks are agent-based and consider the person performing the act rather then the act

The Engaged Professional Essay

1817 words - 7 pages Molly from any advertising photos due to her ‘big build’ and concern of negative publicity regarding the company image. The ethical frameworks of Non Consequentialism, Consequentialism, Virtue and Care will be applied to analyse this scenario. Non Consequentialism is an action based perspective considering acts are right or wrong in relation to the rules or principles surrounding the act disregarding any following consequences (Burgh, Field