The Usa Patriot Act Of 2001: Need For National Security Vs. Protection Of Civil Liberties

1436 words - 6 pages

In a post-September 11th America, it is not uncommon for the mentioning of the word “terrorist” to spark any number of emotions in its citizens. In response to activities such as the attacks on the World Trade Center, Pentagon, as well as the 2001 anthrax scares, Congress proposed the USA PATRIOT Act. Supporters of the Act cite the importance and immeasurable need for greater protection in terms of national security, which is the government’s responsibility first and foremost to protect its citizens from enemies foreign and domestic. However, for every proponent there is an equally passionate opponent who partially believe not only does the Act impede on civil liberties and individual rights but was an opportunistic ploy to grant excess power to the government in the wake of September 11th empathy.
USA PATRIOT is what is referred to as a “backronym”, or a title from which is construed from a pre-existing word. The phrase itself stands for Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, 2014). While the goals and provisions outlined in the original and supplemental Act documents aim to accomplish what the title implies, there are still an increasing number of opponents to its contents. The Act of Congress, of which was originally signed in to law by former President George W. Bush in 2001, has been at the focus of political, media, and private scrutiny since its conception. While its proponents argue the need for government immersion to combat the probability of future and/or current terrorist activity and nation security concerns, adversaries question the scale of impedance on individual civil liberties. Specific subjects of controversy being addressed include the use of surveillance and wiretapping, reasonable expectations of privacy, and means of information sharing. The following paragraphs delve into a brief synopsis of controversial issues surrounding the USA PATRIOT Act.
The issue of surveillance practices has been a cause of concern since the Acts establishment. Title II of the act entitled “Enhanced Surveillance Procedures” which encompasses Section 201 through Section 225 (USA PATRIOT Act of 2001, 2001) is devoted specifically to outlining expanded government powers. Since 2001 certain controversial statutes were removed or changed such as the “requirement that the government prove a surveillance target under FISA is a non-U.S. citizen and agent of a foreign power” (Justice). It is stated in several resources that part of the initial discourse of surveillance powers was due to a general misunderstanding in the meaning.
The surveillance portion of the USA PATRIOT Act seemingly provided additional government power in situations crucial to national security; it allowed for techniques to find, track, and gather information on suspected terrorists and terrorist activity especially on U.S. soil. Also expanded upon were wiretapping abilities...

Find Another Essay On The USA PATRIOT Act of 2001: Need for National Security vs. Protection of Civil Liberties

Civil Liberties VS National Security Essay

683 words - 3 pages All Americans would agree that it is important to feel safe and secure. But the important question posed is: are Americans ready and willing to give up many everyday freedoms that we take for granted? My answer is no. I understand it is the government's job to protect its people and keep them safe, but having some of my liberties taken away from me is not something that I am ready to give up.As discussed in class, the Patriot Act would limit

Patriot Act Violates Civil Liberties Essay

1834 words - 7 pages any foreign national associated with a communist party or movement. If you think the USA PATRIOT Act is a big thorn in the side of our future of free expression in this country, It's nothing compared with the actions of the Justice Department. After September 11th, reports surfaced of FBI agents questioning people about their political views and activities. In one situation in October of 2001, a retired man in San Francisco was questioned

The U.S. Patriot Act and the Risk of Losing Our Civil Liberties

1841 words - 8 pages thoughts on civil liberties forever. Becoming and staying a free society is a very difficult balance in which we must maintain or security by not limiting our freedoms. Liberty in America rests on our complex constitutional system of checks and balances. But sadly this very fabric of liberty and freedom was shattered on the morning of September 11, 2001. This act of terror changed everything because it was the very first global attack of a massive show

The Constitutionality of the USA Patriot Act

2119 words - 8 pages The Constitutionality of the USA PATRIOT Act One of America’s founding father said that “those who surrender freedom for security will not have, nor do they deserve, either one.” Benjamin Franklin’s belief is especially relevant today, following the introduction a Big Brother-like Act of Congress, the USA Patriot Act. In such a case, which employs draconian methods to stop terrorists, an important question must be asked: Should we

The USA Patriot Act

955 words - 4 pages trackand intercept communications, both for law enforcement and foreign intelligence gathering purposes. The USA Patriot Act is an extremely valuable tool to protect America and prevent other terrorist acts from occurring if used and enforced properly.The Patriot Act covers a wide area of items to include, enhanced domestic security, which provides for counter terrorism funds and the use of military assistance in certain emergencies. The Act also

American Civil Liberties are NOT Violated by the Patriot Act

2131 words - 9 pages protection. This essay offers a critical analysis of the arguments for and against the U.S. Patriot Act. The result will be a conclusion affirming the validity of the U.S. Patriot Act due to the fact that our civil liberties are not violated to the extent argued by the opposition. The U.S. Patriot Act was a bill adopted under the Bush administration that purportedly affords the government the tools required to surveil, investigate, and

The USA Patriot Act

2666 words - 11 pages future terrorist attacks.      The Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism ACT of 2001, was signed into law on October 26, 2001, shortly after the September 11th attacks. The act was passed in a direct response to the attacks, as a way for Law Enforcement to combat and deter terrorism. Schmalleger (2003) on page 8 summarizes the USA PATRIOT ACT. ?A federal law (Public Law

Patriot Act of 2001 and Terrorism

715 words - 3 pages Wire Taps, forced entry without a warrant, unlawful arrest, and cavity searches at the airports. These illegal actions are violations against our civil liberties, but they are legal. Since the adoption of the Patriot Act of 2001, our security and freedom has been in question. Our forefathers foreseen that these violations of search and seizure are unconstitutional and enacted the Bill of Rights laws to ensure that our liberties are protected


1332 words - 5 pages Today the word "patriot" sparks a different meaning then it did 5 years ago. People now are split on what they think when the word "patriot" means to themselves. One person may think of how great their government has been and another may think the whole system needs changed. Today paying close attention when you hear the USA PATRIOT Act and awkward acronym stands for Uniting Strengthening America by Providing the Appropriate Tools Required to

The Bill of Rights and Protection of Civil Liberties

822 words - 3 pages herself. The Bill of Rights today is in need of revision;however it still protects civil liberties and is the best declaration for human rights that America has. Only 31 years ago did the Court rule that prayers would not take place in the business of government. In 1971 a defense analyst turned over the Pentagon Papers, which documented a hidden involvement with Vietnam. Nixon claimed that the papers were a "threat to national

2001 USA Patriot Act is Unconstitutional and Ineffective

2084 words - 8 pages a DNA sample for tracking purposes, or a national security identification card that everyone will be required to carry. The advantage of this alternative would be increased protection from terrorism and the disadvantage would be severely diminished civil rights.      The third alternative would be to get rid of the Patriot Act altogether and go back to the way it was before the terrorist attacks. America seemed to function nicely and safely

Similar Essays

Civil Liberties Versus The Usa Patriot Act

1882 words - 8 pages would be if an American citizen says something against the president, he or she could be investigated by the FBI just for exercising their freedom of speech. The USA PATRIOT Act also violates the First Amendment's guarantee of free speech by prohibiting the suspects in search orders from telling others about those searches, even where there is no real need for secrecy ("The USA PATRIOT and Government Actions that threaten Civil Liberties"). In

Legality Of The Patriot Act A Theft Of Civil Liberties Or The Protection Of American Life

4600 words - 18 pages threat of terrorism which had taken root on Sept. 11th (ACLU: The USA PATRIOT Act). The passing of the Patriot Act has generated intense and heated debate among advocates for individual rights as well as those who believe in strict interpretation of the Constitution. Several prominent and prevalent groups, formed to protect the individual right of the American public, such as the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) and People For the American Way

The Patriot Act Vs Civil Liberties

1191 words - 5 pages tolerated. “The sad truth is that most Americans have already lost the battle when it comes to keeping personal information absolutely private.”( Lee, M.Dilascio, Tracey M.4). Work Cited Lee, M.DiLascio, Tracey M. "Counterpoint: The Patriot Act Is Necessary For National Security." Points Of View: Homeland Security & Civil Liberties (2013): 3. Points of View Reference Center. Web. 9 Feb. 2014. Belanger, CraigNewton, Heather. "Point: The

National Security Vs. Civil Liberties Essay

533 words - 2 pages more information about potential suspects. These new measures, included in the USA Patriot Act, delicately trace the line between national security and civil liberties. A brief look at how the Bush administration has extended its powers since September 11th includes the detaining without charge of thousands of Muslim and Arab-American men without release of information to kin nor legal access, a new Bureau of Prisons regulation which allows