An Archaic Punishment: The Death Penalty As An Ineffective Deterrent

2475 words - 10 pages

Former Seattle police chief Norm Stamper correctly says, “The death penalty is inefficient and extravagantly expensive” (citation).
The death penalty raises important questions about the right to life, who possesses that right to life, and under what circumstances a right to life can be taken away. With that, it then also calls into question the circumstances under which the death penalty might be assigned. Scholars and philosophers, as well as the entire population, have been debating the effectiveness and equities of capital punishment since the beginning of the institution. Racial and socioeconomic equities constitute its own argument. Here, I want to focus on the facts that prove the death penalty is an ineffective punishment because it wastes resources, it is not cost effective, and there are better alternatives that would fulfill its purpose of deterring crime better. It is ineffective and should be abandoned as a practice to deter crime or at least fixed which you can’t do.
Scholars and philosophers, as well as the entire U.S. population, have been debating the effectiveness and equities of capital punishment since the beginning of the institution. Legal challenges peaked in 1972 with the 5-4 Supreme Court decision in Furman v. Georgia. This decision effectively ended capital punishment in every state because it characterized its laws as “arbitrary and capricious” and the practice of the death penalty as “cruel and unusual” punishment, a direct violation of the Eight Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. It also stated that the capital punishment laws violated the Fourteenth Amendment which protects the due process rights guaranteed to U.S. citizens. Nevertheless, the moratorium on the death penalty ended four years later with the Supreme Court case Gregg v. Georgia in 1976. The Court upheld Georgia’s new statute in a 7-2 decision because it assured “the judicious and careful use of the death penalty by requiring a bifurcated proceeding where the trial and sentencing are conducted separately, specific jury findings as to the severity of the crime and the nature of the defendant, and a comparison of each capital sentence's circumstances with other similar cases” (oyez). They said the death penalty was not always “cruel and unusual” punishment. Also, in 1976, the Court declared a mandatory death penalty for specific crimes not allowing jury discretion was unconstitutional in the case Woodson v. North Carolina (http://justice.uaa.alaska.edu/death/history.html). Even today, in the 21st Century, the death penalty is still a hotly debated topic. It is an ineffective method to achieve its purpose of deterring crime.
The primary purpose of the death penalty is to deter violent crime. Any punishment can be an effective deterrent if and only if it is consistently and expeditiously carried out. The death penalty is not an efficient method, however, to effectively and repeatedly deter crime because it is not feasible or reasonable for capital...

Find Another Essay On An Archaic Punishment: The Death Penalty as an Ineffective Deterrent

Capital punishment-death penalty Essay

1506 words - 6 pages The Death PenaltyThe death penalty is an effective method of punishing criminals who have committed murder. The death penalty should be used more often so that people will get the hint that they should not kill anyone for any reason, or else they are going to die as well. If used correctly it could be more cost efficient to just give him or her the chair, than it would to keep them in jail for their whole lives. I feel that a criminal should be

The Death Penalty - Just Punishment for Murder

1148 words - 5 pages Walter Burns, an eloquent defender of the death penalty, execution is the only punishment that can remind people of the moral order that human beings alone live by (qtd in Hertzburg 4). Van Den Haag states that the desire to see crime punished is felt because the criminal gratifies his desires by means that the noncriminal has restrained from using. The punishment of the criminal is needed to justify the restraint of the noncriminal (30). Society has

Fair Punishment and the Death Penalty

908 words - 4 pages affect criminals either. Many believe that rehabilitation is the answer. The truth is that rehabilitation has been proven to be uneffective, and capital punishment is often the only penalty that matches the shocking nature of some crimes (Bonner). The death penalty, also, can bring a closure to the victims' families (Bonner). Revenge has been taken, and the victims' families have recieved "an eye for an eye." It may even help bring closure

This essay states that the death penalty is an effective punishment in some respects. It gives both fact and statistics and proves a very good point.

1426 words - 6 pages under the states supervision."Electrocution had occasion caused extensive burns and needed morethan one application of electric current to kill the condemned"- AmnestyCapital Punishment is immoral in principle, and unfair.It assures the execution of some innocent people. As a remedyfor crime, it has no purpose and no effect. Both Greeks and the Romansinvoked the death penalty for a wide variety of offenses.The possibility of an innocent person

Capital Punishment, the lawful infliction of the death penalty

874 words - 3 pages Capital punishment is the lawful infliction of the death penalty, and since ancienttimes has been used as punishment for a wide variety of offenses ( Software ToolworksEncyclopedia: Capital Punishment ). The standard for this judgment is that thepunishment must be based on the severity of the offense. 'Murder, for example is widelyconsidered an offense meriting the death penalty- In which case is called a capitaloffense-or life imprisonment

Death Penalty Essay: The Barbaric Practice of Capital Punishment

3558 words - 14 pages very human instinct for revenge shaped much of our original thoughts on punishment. Hammurabi's Code, as well as the Bible referred to "eye for an eye." "Proponents and opponents of capital punishment probably concede that there is an element of revenge in retributive justice-maybe the largest element in it-and that it may be the reason for the masses' continued support for the death penalty." (Hook 82) As societies have advanced, however, the

The Death Penalty: A Just Method of Punishment

2100 words - 8 pages the fact that the majority of society agrees that the death penalty is a just and fair way to punish convicted murderers. The death penalty is justifiable because it deters crime and coincides with the justice system's belief that the punishment should fit the crime. The death penalty deters crime by executing criminals who committed heinous crimes and uses them as an example to others who would also commit heinous crimes. Prison time can deter

Capital punishment, the legal infliction of the death penalty

1337 words - 5 pages Capital punishment is the legal infliction the death penalty. It is obviously the most severe form of criminal punishment. (Bedau1) Capital punishment is a controversial way of dealing with violent criminals. The main alternative to the death penalty is life in prison. Capital punishment has been around for thousands of years as a means of eradicating criminals. A giant debate started between supporters and opposers of execution, over the

The Death Penalty is Cruel and Unusual Punishment

1319 words - 5 pages needed for both kinds of cases. There will be more pre-trial motions be filed and answered. More experts will be needed for the whole case. Twice as many attorneys will be needed for the defense, and another group of people will be needed for the prosecution. The jurors will need to be tested individually on their viewpoints concerning the death penalty. The cases are more likely to be requested. Two trials will be held, one for punishment

Capital Punishment Essay: Death Penalty is Good for the Economy

1320 words - 5 pages years the prisoner would spend in jail plus the cost of new construction during an average of 60 years (total is approx. $4,560,000). Even if the prisoner spent 20 years in prison the cost would be approx. $1,520,000. How is the death penalty a punishment that fits the crime? Well, not every prisoner deserves the death penalty. People who kill someone in self defense should not be treated as one who kills just for the sake of killing. This is

Is the Death Penalty Cruel and Unusual Punishment?

1239 words - 5 pages as the death penalty continues, consequently this would be the case if the majority were given life in prison without parole. Most convicted people are not sentenced to the maximum terms to fit their crimes especially if it is the first crime committed. “The Ultimate Punishment: A Defense,” an article in The Death Penalty: Pro and Con written by Ernest Van Den Haag , shares this “Abolitionists appear to value the life of a convicted murderer or

Similar Essays

The Death Penalty Is An Acceptable Form Of Punishment

3297 words - 13 pages restitution for victimsí families (ìCase Against Death Penaltyî). Such stiff penalties are now common. The fear that a criminal will be prematurely released is reinforced every time someone like Charles Manson, convicted under earlier laws, gets a hearing for a possible parole (Landauer). There is no proof that the death penalty is a deterrent to crime, nor has it ever been; it is used mainly as punishment for criminals, retribution for the

Just Punishment? The Death Penalty Essay

2211 words - 9 pages deterrent and most agree with these findings. However, questions that surround this type of data abound. To deter means to prevent or discourage someone from acting by means of fear.Deterrence should not be the main reason why the death penalty is used. In other words, the punishment should be given because it is deserved not because it may deter others. If deterrence is a result of the proper punishment then that should just be seen as a bonus

Capital Punishment The Death Penalty

565 words - 2 pages this juncture of time, the question of it being just was answered by the majority - and the majority rules.Many experts who speak against the death penalty cite it as barbaric. The definition of murder, according to Webster, is 'the unlawful killing of a human being with malice aforethought.' Therefore an uneducated person would classify murder as equally barbaric. The mitigating factor of the death penalty is, or should be, an already established

Death Penalty: Ineffective, Inhumane, And Immoral

1263 words - 5 pages than keeping said criminal imprisoned for life (“Should the death penalty be banned as a form of punishment?”) . Money is money, regardless. Most people do not want their hard earned money spent on anything that is not helping them in some way. They also state that society should grow mentally instead of resorting to barbaric methods of having the guilty pay for their crimes. The “eye for an eye” mentality comes to mind and is only supporting the