An Argument For The Legalization Of Drugs. Based On John Stuart Mills' "Revised Harm Principle"'

1042 words - 4 pages

The question of whether or not to legalize certain drugs has been debated for decades. Although opponents have thus far been successful in preventing this, there are nonetheless a substantial number of people who believe that legalization should be given a chance. Their arguments range from the seeming ineffectiveness of current drug laws to the simple premise that the government has no right to prohibit its citizens from using drugs if they choose to do so. This essay will address the issue from the standpoint of John Stuart Mills' 'Revised Harm Principle",' which asserts that people should be free to do what they want unless they threaten the vital interests (i.e., security or autonomy) of others.Using Mills' principle as a litmus test for this issue leads one to come down on the side of legalization. Since Mills is concerned not with individual rights, but with the consequences of one's actions on other people, the question becomes: Is drug use an action that, although performed by an individual, threatens the vital interests of others? Using the example of a casual, responsible drug user who is a contributing (or non-detracting) member of society, it is clear that more harm is done to others if the user must resort to illegal methods to obtain his drugs. The very act of buying drugs is intrinsically illegal and carries the threat of establishing a criminal record for the buyer. This can have a devastating effect on his family, his lifestyle, and his career. The effects on society as a whole include more crowded jail cells (prompting politicians to demand more jails be built), higher taxes to support these jails, and the loss, or at least diminution, of a productive citizen. In order to buy drugs illegally, the user may be forced to expose himself to the fringes of the criminal world--something he would never do under any other circumstances. If drugs were legalized, the criminal stigma would be removed from their purchase, possession, and use. The government would collect taxes on drug sales and, conversely, would not be spending millions of dollars to stem the flow of illegal drugs. This increase in tax dollars could be put to use in drug education and treatment programs for those individuals who are unable to moderate their intake and subsequently become addicts. Then the government would be intervening with its citizens' lives in a benevolent manner (and only when asked) rather than in a forceful, punitive way.Many opponents to legalization point out that drug use leads to spousal and child abuse, random criminal acts precipitated by the effects of drugs on a user's inhibitions, and crimes committed to support drug habits. This argument is fundamentally defective because it addresses the abuse of drugs, which is not the issue here. When an individual's use of drugs leads him to harm others, it becomes a behavioral problem. That is, the issue is no longer drugs, but the behavior of the individual. If that behavior breaks a law, the...

Find Another Essay On An Argument for the Legalization of Drugs. Based on John Stuart Mills' "Revised Harm Principle"'

Marijuana the argument, 'marijuana is a safe drug and it's use will not cause harm or lead to addiction to harder drugs'

1174 words - 5 pages 'Marijuana is a safe drug and its use will not cause harm or lead to addiction to harder drugs'i disagree, my essay labels clearly the medically proven effects of marijuana use, and although there is no proof that marijuana leads to addiction of harder drugs, many heroin and cocaine users say their first experience with drugs was marijuana.I disagree with this statement and to back up my argument I have collected a range of information from

The Harm of Puppy Mills Essay

2375 words - 10 pages . This happens to the puppies and their mothers because of the fact that they are in wire cages that are open on the bottom so it makes for an easier cleanup. Other risks that the ASPCA have seen in puppy mill mothers and newborns include severe tooth decay, ear infections, kennel cough, lesions on the eyes, blindness, fleas and ticks and many more diseases (ASPCA). The problem with puppy mills is that there is no veterinary care provided to the

Argument for the Legalization of Marijuana

1024 words - 4 pages Argument for the Legalization of Marijuana Is cannabis a danger to the public? – I think not. Should cannabis be legalised? I think so. If you agree with me then read this article. If you don’t, then read it anyway. It might teach you a thing, or two, about reality. Cannabis, weed, grass, hemp, shit, ganga, bhang, marijuana; they are all the same: completely harmless, and completely misunderstood. 260 million people worldwide use

Argument for Legalization of Marijuana

1525 words - 6 pages more important tasks such as improving transportation or education. As drug arrests rise, so do the populations in state prisons. This has become an immediate problem with no real solution. The legalization of possessing small amounts of marijuana can contribute positively to the medical and economic world as well as cut down on the prison population. Many people today use marijuana for multiple reasons. There will always be the teenager who

John Stuart Mill - "On Liberty": "The Liberty of Action."

1035 words - 4 pages , ..." According to John Stuart Mill, one has the right to have the absolute decision over himself and should also be allowed to harm himself, as long as it does not influence anybody else in a negative way. Coming back to driving, society might have the right to enforce ban on smoking or using a cell phone while driving because it endangers other members of society. However that is not the case of wearing or not wearing seat belts.Our society is

The Legalization of Drugs and The Consequences on Society

2243 words - 9 pages most popular one is that it is used by doctors. The argument that marijuana is used in medicine has been brought forth in almost every argument for the drug but there is a problem with this argument that most supporters do not take the time to uncover. According to the Institute of Medicine, there is no future in smoked marijuana as medicine.(Summary of the Top Ten Facts on legalization) The Institute of Medicine does not support smoked marijuana

Gore Vidal's argument for the legalization of Marijuana

820 words - 3 pages every drug and liked none." Here he creates a rhetorical argument. His motivation is not one of a drug addict clamoring to get his "next fix," rather his argument is based on the right for each person to be able to "kill himself if he chooses." He argues that denying a person the right to do something will automatically awaken their desire for the forbidden. To prove his point, he refers to the point in time when alcohol was forbidden, and the

The Argument on the Legalization of Same Sex Marriages

1493 words - 6 pages The Argument on the Legalization of Same Sex Marriages The argument over the legalization of same sex marriages is rapidly becoming one of the most vigorously advocated reform subjects in recent law review. Being gay and loving someone is not illegal, but uniting that couple in a legal marriage is rejected by most of society in this country. Each state has had to deal with legal issues concerning same sex marriages to some extent. Most

The Case for Principle-Based Accounting

1011 words - 4 pages their positions based on the principles followed. Disadvantages of the principle-based approach include the proliferation of too many accounting approaches with different principles, room to manipulate accounting statements and lack of precise rules on how to account for transactions. Discussion on the accounting standard, whether rules-based or principle-based accounting, that best serves the needs of stakeholders have focused on the experiences

An argument Based on James Q Wilson-"Just take away their guns" Great for one of the free-writing assignments that you have to respond to an argument of your choice

838 words - 3 pages Based on James Q Wilson-"Just take away their guns"College Reading and writingGun control is an extremely debated issue in today's society. The majority supports high gun control laws, but they will never work. From the precedent, gun control laws have actually given rise to homicide and increased the crime rate. Most criminals do not get their firearms from gun stores or pawnshops. They either borrow them, or steal them. Only about one-sixth

The Moral Philosophy of John Stuart Mill

1124 words - 4 pages At the very heart of John Stuart Mill's Utilitarianism is a concern which can be traced back to the Biblical parable of the house built on sand - an improper foundation. With this in mind, Mill audaciously sets out to develop a "foundational program" of morality, one that incorporates a principle that can be the basis for all other moral thinking. To find this foundational principle, the naturalistic Mill examines the common, fundamental beliefs

Similar Essays

John Stuart Mill's Harm Principle Essay

1025 words - 4 pages John Stuart Mill discusses the conception of liberty in many ways. I’d like to focus of his ideas of the harm principle and a touch a little on his thoughts about the freedom of action. The harm principle and freedom on action are just two subtopics of Mill’s extensive thoughts about the conception on liberty. Not only do I plan to discuss and explain each of these parts on the conception of liberty, but I also plan to discuss my thoughts and

Legalization Of Drugs Argument Essay

2996 words - 12 pages civilians, the economic destruction on South America, an increase of taxes and an increase of inflation in the states. Most of the major arguments applied against the decriminalization of drugs deal with the notion that drugs are bad, dangerous, and harmful to society. It becomes difficult to praise the use of such drugs as crack, heroin, and cocaine. Instead, looking at it objectively, one can come to understand that without legalization

Exploring John Mill's Harm Principle Essay

1504 words - 6 pages Freedom is a necessary principle to abide by in order for the human race to function. On the other hand, freedom can be taken advantage of, thus resulting in harmful consequences to those directly and indirectly involved. The article, “On Liberty” by John S. Mills, places emphasis on the functioning of individual liberty and its co-existence with society. Mills stresses the limits of individual liberty through what is famously known as his

The Differences In John Stuart Mills And Jeremy Bentham's Versions Of Utilitarianism

2653 words - 11 pages The Differences in John Stuart Mills and Jeremy Bentham's Versions of Utilitarianism In what ways did John Stuart Mill's version of utilitarianism differ from that of Jeremy Bentham? Which do you consider preferable? The Cambridge International Dictionary of English defines utilitarianism as "the system of thought which states that the best action or decision in a particular situation is the one which most benefits the most people