An Arrogant Argument Essay

1490 words - 6 pages

One of the most destructive and arrogant persons in history was Adolf Hitler. The destruction that he and his regime brought on humanity has seldom seen its equal. In reality the Holocaust was a terrible horror, but in Hitler’s mind it was merely a brushstroke in the masterpiece that he believed he was creating. Hitler believed that the Aryan race was superior to all others and that it was only natural, and not cruel, that the higher would show no humanity toward the lower (296). This prejudiced belief predominated Hitler’s thinking. In his essay, On Nation and Race, his assumption that Aryans are superior to all others creates a type of logical fallacy called “Begging the Question” (Rottenberg 291).
Hitler not only assumes that Aryans are superior to all other races but that the German people believe this as well. He assumes that that the question of race superiority has already been answered. According to Annette T. Rottenberg’s The Structure of Argument, “if [a] writer makes a statement that assumes that the very question being argued has already been proved, [that] writer is guilty of begging the question” (291). Hitler proudly states, “All the human culture, all the results of art, science, and technology that we see before us today, are almost exclusively the creative product of the Aryan” (300). This statement, which he presents as if it is fact, is most certainly not true. He uses this fallacy to promote his agenda. He wants to take out the competition, most specifically the Jews, so that the Aryan race can dominate Germany and eventually the world. Hitler makes another statement which begs the question: “Nature subject[s] the weaker part to such severe living conditions that by them alone the number is limited” (297). Again he’s making a statement as if it has been proven. I think Hitler believes that he is beyond reproach and that there is no need for him to support his arguments. One might argue that nature is not the one that subjects the so-called weaker persons to punishment, but that other forces are at work; such as racist power wielding maniacs.
While begging the question is the fallacy that epitomizes Hitler’s thought process, there are other types of fallacies at work. One might argue that Hitler’s thinking is predominated by another type of logical fallacy, for example, “Non Sequitur” (293). This is plausible. Rottenberg's text states, “[N]on sequitur, which means ‘it does not follow,’ is [a] fallacy of irrelevance” (293). If a writer makes an argument and provides examples that are irrelevant to the question at hand and presents those examples as though they prove the point that the writer is attempting to make, he has done himself a disservice, and the proposed conclusion does not follow the evidence provided. Hitler is certainly guilty of using this kind of fallacy. In fact, Hitler makes the argument that animals are at odds with other animals outside of their own species and do not mate naturally...

Find Another Essay On An Arrogant Argument

Is There a God?, by Bertrand Russell

1349 words - 6 pages remark: “I will say further that, if there be a purpose and if this purpose is that of an Omnipotent Creator, then that Creator, so far from being loving and kind, as we are told, must be of a degree of wickedness scarcely conceivable”. The author repeats certain sentences to make his argument effective, he emphasizes on a particular sentence, at some places, to convince the reader to agree with him. For example, in the lines like, “An

A Generalization of a Generation Essay

1041 words - 5 pages author makes a valid argument. Our generation is being generalized into one word “A millennial.” One generation is filled with many individuals, each individual having traits making them unique. It is unfair and close-minded for the older generations to make a basic assumption about an entire generation of people. Joel Stein wrote an article titled, “"Millennials: The Me Me Me Generation." In his article he argues that he believes the term millennials

A Critique Of “Is There A GOD? By Bertrand Russell”

1763 words - 8 pages intolerably unhappy. So far as this is true, it is a coward's argument. Nobody but a coward would consciously choose to live in a fool's paradise” (Para 10), it gives a strong idea about the critical tone of the author. The author is not only criticizing, but he is also using an offensive language. He has used harsh words at various instances in the essay, which decreases his credibility. He tries to persuade the reader by giving arguments and backing

Why American's Vote the way they do

628 words - 3 pages , Voting Rich" discusses how the Republican Party has created and maintained a great connection with the American Heartland. They have grabbed the middle-class on issues that rely on strong efficacy, not actual issues that will benefit them. The article discusses how the middle-class is voting for tax-breaks for the rich blindly. The article stated, "They (the Democrats) come across in much of America as arrogant and out of touch the moment the

Economy and Social Class in the Articles "Class Matters" and in The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald

838 words - 4 pages to show the difference in social class. Tom Buchanans is a member of an incredibly wealthy family. Fitzgerald describes Tom as having “two shining arrogant eyes…and a voice full of contempt” (7). Meanwhile, Jay Gatsby, the novel’s protagonist, comes from an incredibly poor family and is described as having an aura of trust and understanding (48). Fitzgerald uses the two contrasting descriptions to show how Tom, who stands as the symbol of the old

Oleanna

1787 words - 7 pages Oleanna has been much publicized as a play about political correctness, about sexual harassment, about the relations between professors and students, men and women. On one level, you could make an argument for these claims. Yet Oleanna defines itself as a play about individual responsibility. As Carol, one of the characters, says, "What has led you to this place? Not your sex. Not your race. Not your class. YOUR OWN ACTIONS" (39). This is a play

The Nature of Man in The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald

855 words - 3 pages In the 1925 novel, The Great Gatsby, F. Scott Fitzgerald portrays the nature of man, and that, though characters may live complete opposite lives and be from different upbringings, even the most contrasting of people can have similarities. In the novel, the readers are introduced to two characters named Tom Buchanan and George Wilson. Tom Buchanan is introduced as an arrogant, wealthy east egg man who has never had to work for his money

Ignorance in 12 Angry Men

706 words - 3 pages across the road could have never saw the boy stab his father, due to she wasn’t wearing her glasses and it was pitch black. Number eight is a man that stands up to the irrational and dangerous people of the jury. This is shown through number eight and juror number three, they have an argument about juror three pulling the switch on the young boy. He says “For this kid? You bet I’d pull the switch” juror eight then calls him a “self- appointed

The Inescapable Web

1020 words - 5 pages . Throughout Oedipus Rex, Sophocles masterfully weaves Oedipus’ fatal traits of naiveté, arrogance, and curiosity into the intriguing plot. The first of Oedipus’ fatal traits is naiveté, a flaw which causes him to unknowingly weave his own inescapable web of complications. While searching for the murderer of Laius, Creon recommends that Oedipus ask the blind prophet, Teiresias, for his thoughts. Teiresias and Oedipus begin an argument after the

Charlie Gordon in Flowers for Algernon by Daniel Keye

734 words - 3 pages intellectual growth occurred in an argument with Prof Nemur after the cocktail party. Nemur says “We had no control over … your personality… you’ve developed from a likable, retarded young man into an arrogant, self-centered, antisocial bastard” (Keyes, 247) these points that Prof Nemur makes are potent enough to alter Charlie’s perception completely. In fact Charlie realizes the he doesn’t have to be arrogant or inconsiderate to grow intellectually. In

Heroism in Epic of Gilgamesh

948 words - 4 pages , even today. Gilgamesh was arrogant, and headstrong. When he wanted to do something he did it; no matter what the consequences, as in the time when he said on page 27: "We go to kill the Evil One,/Humbaba. We must prove/Ourselves more powerful than he." Enkidu pleaded with him not to go in the next paragraph: "Enkidu was afraid of the forest of Humbaba/And urged him not to go, but he/Was not as strong as Gilgamesh in argument

Similar Essays

The Morally Corrupt Characters Essay

1242 words - 5 pages show that Tom Buchanan views everyone under himself. He views himself as the head leader coming from a line of rich classy men. Tom is also a very arrogant and rude man. When he gets in an argument with Jay Gatsby over his wife, Daisy Buchanan, he says, “I suppose the latest thing is to sit back and let Mr. Nobody from Nowhere make love to your wife. Well if that’s the idea you can count me out” (Fitzgerald 123). Tom, as well as everyone else in

Dualism Essay

995 words - 4 pages nonphysical mind needed to interact with the physical body. These difficulties provided a motive for the move to popular substance dualism.The first major argument for substance dualism is religion. Each of the major religions place belief in life after death; that there is an immortal soul that will survive death. This very closely resembles substance dualism. The mind can be substituted for the immortal soul. In fact the two are almost interchangeable

The Rhetorical Situation Essay

948 words - 4 pages critically analyzed regarding an argument as cited by Rustian Phelps: • Text: What type of text is it? What is the author’s main argument? Is the thesis explicitly stated, or does the reader have to infer the argument from the supporting data? What style is the text, casual or formal? Does the author have a respect of the reader, is the language patronizing or arrogant? Is the language difficult to understand? Does the text appear credible

Korean Dog Eating Tradition Essay

1191 words - 5 pages morality of the opposing argument. He presents Bridget Bardot?s statement that ?a cultured country does not allow its people to eat dogs?, which he labels as ?silly arrogance.? This statement, in the context that it was used, certainly seems arrogant and even racist to the reader, by implying that South Koreans are ?uncultured? because they eat dog. He also presents an even more bigoted statement by Bardot, in which she denies that westerners would