This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

A Comparison Of The Economic Theories Of Adam Smith And Karl Marx

2467 words - 10 pages

There is perhaps not a more famous ongoing dialectic argument in the field of political economy than the one between Adam Smith and Karl Marx in regards to capitalism. The two thinkers, although coming to radically different conclusions about the outcomes of the capitalist system for all parties involved, agree on a surprising number of ideas such as labor being the source of commodities’ value, as well as the fact that the division of labor increases productivity. However, their different conceptions of what determines the price of a commodity, the driving force behind and the effects of the division of labor, and the purpose of the capitalist system have widespread implications that cause their holistic arguments to diverge considerably.
Marx’s analysis of capitalism begins with an investigation of the commodity because the wealth of capitalist nations is essentially “an immense collection of commodities” (Chapter 1). Marx differentiates between the use-value and the exchange-value of any given commodity. The use-value of a commodity refers to its qualitative ability to satisfy a human need, while its exchange-value is the “quantitative relation… in which use-values of one kind exchange for use-values of another kind” (Chapter 1). Therefore, exchange-value is not an intrinsic quality of a commodity; it is only discovered in comparing a fixed quantity of commodity A to a fixed quantity B. Since differing quantities of these two commodities appear to have the same value, Marx concludes, there must be a common element between them that allows them to be compared. That element is labor, measured in the socially-average metric of labor-time. Therefore, to Marx, the exchange-value of a commodity is wholly and exclusively the amount of useful labor put into it.
Here, Smith agrees with Marx, acknowledging that labor is “the only standard by which we can compare the values of commodities at all times and all places” (Book I, Chapter V). He too introduces the idea of exchange-value, although he calls it by a different name: the “real price,” consisting of the amount of “toil and trouble” (Book I, Chapter V) put into producing a commodity. However, Smith then makes an important distinction that Marx does not. Citing the difficulty in quantifying labor due to “different degrees of hardship endured, and of ingenuity exercised” (Book I, Chapter V) between different kinds of labor, Smith introduces the concept of nominal price, or the estimated value of the labor that gives a commodity its value, represented in a quantity of currency.
The nominal price is determined by rules of supply and demand: that is, the amount of a commodity in a given market and the number of buyers and the amount of said product they wish to purchase determining the price of that product. Because of this phenomenon, which Smith terms the “higgling and bargaining of the market,” the nominal price of a commodity may be either higher or lower than its real price, but has a “rough...

Find Another Essay On A Comparison of the Economic Theories of Adam Smith and Karl Marx

Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx Essay

955 words - 4 pages Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx, living in the typical capitalist community in the United States, it is much easier to relate to the thoughts of Adam Smith. This is not to say that I do not agree with some of the precepts of pure Communism, but like the old adage says, Communism looks good on the outside.Adam Smith states his opinion on the mercantile system and its faults, while he dissected, clarified, and revolutionized the mercantilist economy and

Economis Theorists- Adam Smith, Karl Marx, and John Maynard Keynes and their contributions to the field of economics

597 words - 2 pages Throughout the centuries, there have been many economists, who have contributed to the many economic theories. Among them is Adam Smith, also known as the Father of Capitalism. His theory on beneficial workings of the free marketplace and his 1776 Wealth of Nations is what he is most noted for. Karl Marx, the Father of Communism, is most famous for his theory on the conflict within capitalism. There is also John Maynard Keynes, who is known as

Small Element, Big Difference: A comparison of Adam Smith and Karl Marx's view on labor in a capitalist society

1721 words - 7 pages Adam Smith and Karl Marx are both considered few of the most influential giants in social and economical history. When viewing their economical standpoints, it is not difficult to recognize the difference in ideas that they have regarding society. Adam Smith is an advocator for capitalism and the wealth that can be accumulated in it, while Karl Marx critiques on the flaws of capitalism and praises communism that will overthrow the capitalist

Similarites Between the Theories of Max Weber and Karl Marx

1029 words - 4 pages Max Weber and Karl Marx has often been regarded as influential theorists who both analyzed in how the society is constructed in relationship to its economic conditions, more specifically on the division of labour. Both the labour and economics create a force on how societies are shaped and because of that Weber and Marx each developed a unique theory on how individuals react and how societies are formed. Many individuals say that, Marx and

The Comparison of Karl Marx and Matthew Arnold

640 words - 3 pages , there would not be enough time to devote to the enrichment of the individual's religious mind. This is caused by his strong devotion to technological advancement.The view Marx has toward religion and culture as a whole vividly portrays his feelings toward the internal aspect of culture. Marx thought the culture of a nation derived from the economic situation of the nation. His writings show he is more inclined toward the external aspect of

Social Theories of Karl Marx and Maw Weber

945 words - 4 pages today. Both theorists have different theories of the social concept Classism, however they are not that much different from one another. Karl Marx utilizes the term “proletariat” to refer to the "working class". Marx views the members of each class as sharing their own distinctive culture. Max Weber uses the term “class” to refer to people who share a similar level of wealth and income. Weber suggests the distinct components of stratification are

Karl Marx and Neo theories

675 words - 3 pages The relations between wage labours and capitalists at first facilitated rapid technological innovation and economic growth. This idea followed Marx's belief that the capitalist mode of production was flawed and that technology advancements only served the capitalist and not that of the workers. The materialism that the capitalist held was that of wealth above all other was of the essence.Unfortunately, the crises of overproduction are created by

Early and Later Writings of Karl Marx. Compares the classical works of Karl Marx and looks at some of his most well known theories. Includes works cited

2110 words - 8 pages The Early and Later Writings of Karl MarxClassical Marxism has had an influence in a number of areas. One may first think of economics, but Karl Marx's theories have also affected ideas about history, society, ideology, culture, and politics, just to name a few. From his early writings in liberal newspapers to his later ones such as Capital, Marx remained true to his revolutionary ideas and Communist thinking. As most writers, his style may have

Adam Smith and Globalization: China’s Economic Evolution

1056 words - 5 pages pursue the opportunities in the free market with limited boundaries or restrictive government interference. Economic policies should be to open up markets and allow businesses free access to the resources that best meet their needs to remain competitive. The positive results of the international division of labor reap the same benefits today as it did over 200 years ago as written by Adam Smith. Works Cited Censky, A. (2012, June 26). China's

Adam Smith and Globalization: China’s Economic Evolution

1320 words - 6 pages acknowledging that some Chinese workers have been subjected to harsh shortcomings of globalization. Nonetheless, the aforementioned can easily be countered by the simple fact China was not a prosperous society prior to globalization. Despite some economic reforms beginning in 1949 under Mao Zedong, the Chinese government continued to embrace Marxist policies that kept their economy stagnant and their citizens impoverished. Adam Smith was always

Adam Smith and Globalization: China’s Economic Evolution

1158 words - 5 pages globalization. Nonetheless, the aforementioned can easily be countered by the simple fact China was not a prosperous society prior to globalization. Despite some economic reforms beginning in 1949 under Mao Zedong, the Chinese government continued to embrace Marxist policies that kept their economy stagnant and their citizens impoverished. Adam Smith was always concerned about government encroachment on private enterprise and skeptical of its

Similar Essays

A Comparison Of The Economic Philosophies Of Adam Smith, John Stuart Mill, And Karl Marx

1811 words - 7 pages As far back as man has been on earth, he has been driven towards building a community among his peers. Whether that is a community of hunters and gatherers who share whatever the day has brought to them within their tribe, or a larger community which within its structure lie the inner dwellings of division of labor and societal classes. Adam Smith (18th Century), John Stuart Mill (19th Century), and Karl Marx (19th Century) are of the same

Viewpoints Of Durkhiem, Karl Marx, And Adam Smith

790 words - 4 pages keeps the classes where they are. People cannot rise the through the class system. The division of labor is a way of “social control” of the status hierarchy. ADAM SMITH: Adam smith is a good medium of Durkheim and Marx. Adam understood that for a nation, productivity is everything. A lot of productivity occurring within a nation correlates to a lot happening in it. Things are being made and sold because things are needed for different things

Comparing Adam Smith And Karl Marx

562 words - 2 pages Comparing Adam Smith and Karl Marx Smith and Marx agree upon the importance of capitalism as unleashing productive powers. Capitalism is born out of the division of labour... that is, it is made possible by dividing jobs up into simple tasks as a way of increasing efficiency. By increasing efficiency, then everyone can produce more than they personally need. The extra produced can go towards the accumulation of capital, (machines, more land

Adam Smith V. Karl Marx Essay

2229 words - 9 pages industrial prosperity while Smith believes that the incentives of a free market will allow this happen and that human nature will cause Marx’s theory to fail. In the end both men want one common goal which is the best possible economic system for society because both realize that economics is single greatest controller of the major aspects of society. Bibliography: Works Cited Page Marx, Karl. “The Communist Manifesto.” A World of Ideas. Ed. Lee Jacobus. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 209-32. Smith, Adam. “Of the Principle of the Commercial or Mercantile System.” A World Of Ideas. Ed. Lee Jacobus. Boston: Bedford Books, 1998. 195-205.