This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

An Enquiry Concerning The Principles Of Morals

1518 words - 6 pages

     What is a moral? This is a question that has plagued philosophers for many years. Is it possible
to have a set of universal morals? There are many questions that surround the mystery of morals. They
seem to drive our every action. We base our decisions on what is right and what is wrong. But what is it
that actually determines what is right and what is wrong? Is it our sense of reason? Is it our sense of
sentiment? This is a question that David Hume spent much of his life pondering. What exactly is it that
drives our actions? Yes, morals drive them, but what determines what our morals are? What is it that
ultimately drives our actions; our feelings or our minds?
     Hume would say that it is our sentiment that ultimately drives our actions. According to Hume,
reason is incapable of motivating an action. According to Hume, reason cannot fuel an action and
therefore cannot motivate it. Hume feel that all actions are motivated by our sentiment. For example, on
page 84 Appendix I, he gives the example of a criminal. "It resides in the mind of the person, who is
ungrateful. He must, therefore, feel it, and be conscious of it." Here, it is evident that Hume is saying that
unless the person, or criminal in this case, sincerely believes in what he wants to do, he will not be able to
motivate the action. In other words, unless the sentiment is there, the action cannot be willed into being.
Hence, the sentiment is the driving force behind the action.
     Hume does not however say that reason is incapable of determining wether an action is virtuous
or vicious (moral or immoral), but instead he tries to say that the reason for the morality of an action does
not dictate the execution or perversion of an act so far as determination of wether the action is executed
or not. In simpler terms, reason has it's place in determining morality, but it is not in the motivation of an
action. Motivation must come from the heart, or better yet, from within the person; from their beliefs.
Reason merely allows the person to make moral distinctions. Without reason, there would be no morality.
Without reason, one moral clause would not be differentiable from another. That is to say that below all
morals, there must be some underlying truth because "Truth is disputable; not taste" (p.14). If truth were
not disputable, there would be no way to prove that a truth was just that... a truth. To make an analogy to
mathematics, truth is a function of reason, whereas taste is a function of sentiment. Sentiment is a
function of the individual whereas reason is a function of the universe.
     The universe as a whole must follow reason, but the catch is that each individual's universe is
slightly different in that each individual perceives his or her universe differently. "What each man feels
within himself is the standard of...

Find Another Essay On An Enquiry Concerning The Principles Of Morals

Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning

923 words - 4 pages Comparing Knowledge in Descartes’ Meditations on First Philosophy and Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, Rationalists would claim that knowledge comes from reason or ideas, while empiricists would answer that knowledge is derived from the senses or impressions. The difference between these two philosophical schools of thought, with respect to the distinction between ideas and impressions, can be examined in order

Cause and Effect in David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding

954 words - 4 pages Cause and Effect in David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding In An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, David Hume states, “there is not, in any single, particular instance of cause and effect, any thing which can suggest the idea of power or necessary connexion” (Hume, 1993: 41). Hume establishes in section II that all ideas originate from impressions that employ the senses (11). Therefore, in order for there

An Enlightenment of Morals

1308 words - 6 pages throughout the rest of the novel however, never in such a great quantity as when discussing the cannibals. But restraint is not his only focus in this instance. He also makes a point to explain what they were fighting: hunger. Marlow dives into an exploration of the deep, unshakeable concept of hunger, explaining that “no fear can stand up to hunger”(38), and that nothing can drive it away. He elaborates on the concept explaining that he would

Book Report on Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals by Kant

846 words - 3 pages Book Report on Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysic of Morals by Kant Kant states (38,) "act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a universal law of nature". This "categorical imperative" forms the basis of his book, Fundamental Principles of the Metaphysics of Morals. Though at times his writing is confusing Kant lays out his logic as to what a categorical imperative is. Kant divides the book into three

The morals of war

978 words - 4 pages There is an old saying, "All is fair in love and war." This saying is around because during times of war, countries are more concerned with being victorious than with being moral in their actions. If a country were to attempt to be moral, they may lose to a country that will stop at nothing to win. On the personal level of the soldiers, morals are even more difficult to possess. A soldier not only lacks the ability to make major decisions about

the morals of meursault

1258 words - 5 pages the terrors of the war; many other people believed that the human existence had no meaning. The Stranger could be classified as an existentialist novel because the protagonist of the story, Meursault, also seems to have existentialist beliefs. Meursault is a character that is very out of touch with the world. His attitude and morals were not accepted by the people of the society in the story, which leads to his death sentence. When people deal

Ethical Principles On The Case Study Concerning Joelle

691 words - 3 pages Unit 1 Individual Project 1Running head: Unit 1 Individual ProjectUnit 1 Individual Project: Ethical Principles On The case Study Concerning JoelleJohn F ShalkowsiCourse: BUS207-0805A-75 Business EthicsInstructor: Eric FreemanDate: November 14, 2008American Intercontinental UniversityEthical Principles On The Case Study Concerning JoelleThe first principle Joelle could apply would be the Egoism Principle. If she chooses this principle it says

An Essay Concerning The Creation of Government Using the early American texts (e.g., The Federalist Papers)

3451 words - 14 pages governments claim to honor the Constitution of the United States, in reality they create a disparate standard that only serves to unnecessarily complicate the structure of a united political system. Does it not seem more logical then, for a united state to be governed by a united government? Should not the same principles apply to all citizens regardless of where they live within a country's borders? Given the fact that an anti-federalist

on the genealogy of morals

1000 words - 4 pages connection to the subject. In spite of the fact that the death penalty is fit to be very unjust in American society, it still occurs today despite many movements to abolish it. Based off of the principles of the death penalty it is safe to assume that capital punishment was probably derived due to an increase in extreme violence. By invoking a death penalty to the harsher crimes it intimidates these criminals from attempting to pursue the urge

Morals of the Atomic Bomb

1616 words - 7 pages On August 6th 1945 the first atomic bomb as dropped in an attempt to end the war efforts in the pacific. This year will mark the 69th anniversary of the dropping of the bomb, and even after all this time there is still much debate over if dropping the bomb was the right thing to do or not. One of the main reasons I have seen arguing for the dropping of the bomb was that it saved American lives, and that it saved more people than it killed

The Morals of Silencing Chromosomes

1867 words - 8 pages . Females have two X-chromosomes. Rather than having two X’s, males have one X-chromosome and then one Y. The picture to the right also shows a karyotype, but this male has Down syndrome. The only difference between these two karyotypes is that the pair for chromosome #21 has one extra chromosome. This is an example of one the most common types of Down syndrome, trisomy 21, and occurs when the person has three copies of chromosome number 21 (Down

Similar Essays

David Hume’s An Enquiry Concerning The Principles Of Morals

688 words - 3 pages from the heart. In human nature, the heart is the lodging for the inner quality. One with sympathy is susceptible to other's emotions, imbued with that important quality of fellow-feeling. The "heart” dictates moral principles, “for one's innate goodness allows one to take directives from one's own body.” Hume devoted the second book “Treatise” to an account of the human passions and a discussion of their role in human decision making

Principles Of Ethics Case Project: An Enquiry Concerning The Principles Of Morals

1554 words - 6 pages of sentiment? David Hume spent much of his life concentrating on such topics. I will address many of the perspectives Hume discussed in his article, "An Enquiry Concerning the Principles of Morals".What exactly is it that drives our actions? Yes, morals drive them, but what determines what our morals are? I think it has to be one's own family and social culture. I know in my life my mom always taught me to obey the civil laws, whether they were

An Introduction To The Principles Of Morals And Legislation By Jeremey Bentham

1239 words - 5 pages generally considered a moral theory that was found by Jeremey Bentham, a 19th century English philosopher and a social reformer. In 1923, he wrote a book called An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. Bentham idea was to understand the concept of happiness and that it is the definitive goal to all human beings. Bentham believes in a principle in which humans should be motivated by pain and pleasure, Bentham said in his book, “Nature

Reading Analysis: “The Fundamental Principles Of The Metaphysic Of Morals”

664 words - 3 pages moral requirements derive. Therefore, categorical imperative is an obligation to act morally, out of duty and good will alone. In Immanuel Kant’s writing human reason and or rational are innate morals which are responsible for helping human. Needless to say, this also allows people to be able to distinct right from wrong. For the aforementioned reasons, there is no doubt that any action has to be executed solely out of a duty alone and it should