An Overview Of The Philosophies Of Hume, Kant, Aristotle, Augustine, And Epictetus

1160 words - 5 pages

Hume mentions that reason alone does not move one to act. He says the force that propels one to act is passion. Passion is the driver of the inner being as well as reason is the slave of the passions. This leads to the conclusion of impulse does not arise from reason itself, but is directed by it. What makes us act is the love, anger, fear, anxiety, envy we have. When someone is angry, they are possessed with a passion. One does not just say to oneself, “I am going to be angry today.” Thought really is not put into being angry or in love. It just happens naturally. However, reason acts as a director to figure out what action is to be performed; however, the action will not be performed unless a passion is present. Also the discovery of truthfulness and falsity is the power of reason. An agreement or disagreement exists between the falsehood or truth and the relation of ideas. If one does not accept of this agreement or disagreement, then it is neither true nor false and can never be an object of reason.
In addition, Hume says morality is irrational. He adds that morality is under the practical division and influences one’s passions and actions. An example of this is when people are governed by their duties and impelled by others to obey their commands. Also morality is not derived from experience. For example, murder is not something people just go out and want to do. They do not say, “I want to kill someone today.” For that reason, morality resides in passions and not reason. Since morals have an effect on actions and affections, they cannot reside in reasoning.
On the other hand, Kant says reason is action-guiding. In other words, he says it is the purpose behind one’s actions. He says it is not passion that does so because one is making a choice or plan to do something. He says reason is used to make a plan and to see if the test works. Kant also mentions that we reason through and then act. Therefore, we analyze our actions with reasons behind them. Kant says if you can think, you can act morally. Morality is a law that is rational; therefore, we can measure it.
C.
Aristotle’s vision of the good life is one that is eudaimonistic, which means it is full of happiness. If you translated the word literally, it means good spirit. He also says that fame is not part of the self-sufficient life because fame comes from other people’s thoughts. Money is also clearly wrong in the self-sufficient life because people can let it go to their head when they have too much. However, enough money to get by is okay. Aristotle also mentions that the good life is filled with a community that is very close with one another. Along with this, he says each have their own role in society. For example, one person may be a carpenter, another an artist, and the last one a flute player. Other parts of the good life include having good health, a fulfilling career, and enough leisure time. In the good life, he says it is one’s...

Find Another Essay On An Overview of the Philosophies of Hume, Kant, Aristotle, Augustine, and Epictetus

Theory of Self: Kant vs Hume

1922 words - 8 pages The concept of the ‘self’ is regarded as an “entity which persists through time and change” (Grayling, pg. 540), in spite of other variations, albeit unnecessary ones, that occur in a person. Ones self is alleged to be the backbone of “thinking, perceiving, memory, and the like – the ultimate ‘bearers’ of our psychological properties.” (Grayling, pg. 540) The idea of ‘self’ is a topic of important philosophical debate, and one which Kant and

Philosophies of Augustine, Descartes, Arendt on Morality

1648 words - 7 pages philosophy of morality by contemplating the natures of good and evil in relation to God. However, before Augustine could explore concepts relating to God, he attempts to grasp an understanding of God as a being. This proves to be problematic since he could only picture God as “some kind of bodily substance” (Augustine 1961, 133), rather than a spiritual, incorporeal substance. At the same time, Augustine struggles with comprehending the nature of evil

Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas

893 words - 4 pages Aristotle because likewise, he believed that it is ideal for all people to act in an ethical manner by using reason. However, unlike Aristotle, Kant believed one must act ethically as an individual autonomy for the good of society. He said that one must use reason and free will to carry out one's duty and moral obligation to do good. He stressed the concept of not expecting to gain anything in return while performing ethical tasks-- even though one

The Morality of Lying in Contrast to the Philosophies of Kant

2329 words - 9 pages in an effort to preserve one’s feelings, such as in the cliché case of a spouse asking, “Do these jeans make me look fat?” They rarely have any lasting effect, and are, for this argument, considered moot. On the other side of the scale is the outright lie, also known as deception, which is “a sender intentionally trying to get someone to believe something that the sender knows to be false” (Gass & Seiter, 1999). These lies are the sort that have

The Rules Of Life: Epictetus View

1083 words - 4 pages convey a sense of self-control at all times. Epictetus gives us insight on how to live a frugal life. Finally, men are disturbed not by occurrences, but by the views which they take of these happenings. The man of great intelligence accuses neither himself nor another when something goes poorly in his life. As we have seen, it is easy for one to relate Epictetus’ beliefs to his own life in today’s society. It is an amazing feat for Epictetus to have written The Enchiridion so long ago, and for it to apply to our current world.

My notes to review for final. The brief overview of Socrates, Plato, Aristotle, and Epicurus

847 words - 3 pages or false because it is 2) based on appearances - may change; 3) rely on things that are many and changing. Good is like a sun: 1) allows sight; 2) creator & sustainer of life in visible world; 3) purpose to life. Soul exists in particular part of our body 2. Aristotle A. believes that happiness is the end and "most people say that happiness includes pleasure that may be good or bad. So, if pleasures are bad then they can not be our goal

The Soul According to Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine

1187 words - 5 pages The Soul According to Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine The soul can be defined as a perennial enigma that one may never understand. But many people rose to the challenge of effectively explaining just what the soul is about, along with outlining its desires. Three of these people are Plato, Aristotle, and Augustine. Even though all three had distinctive views, the similarities between their views are strikingly vivid. The soul indeed is an

Critique of Edward Snowden's Actions Based on Kant and Aristotle Philosophy

1527 words - 6 pages constructed an argument saying that Snowden’s actions were that of a good person but not of a follower of the polis. Kant has the same argument as Aristotle but brings in the comparative side that the government was also in the wrong. But to start this off right we need to know exactly what Edward Snowden did to get all this attention, and to make it easier to explain the philosophers thoughts. Edward Snowden has become infamous for being the latest

Compare and contrast the concepts of eudaimonia and happiness, and their respective roles in the ethical philosophies of Aristotle and Mill

2188 words - 9 pages is ground in order to get the flour, which is baked in order to make bread, which is made in order to eat. The chain could be continued even further - the bread is eaten in order to satisfy hunger, for example. Aristotle also points out another type of action: actions which are ends in themselves and also constituents in some wider end. An example Urmson gives of this is dancing: each step is an end in itself, but is also a constituent in the

The Theodicies of Augustine and Boethius

915 words - 4 pages good God? This question with the principle of God's sovereignty leads to even more difficult problems, including human responsibility and free will. These problems are not limited to our setting, as church fathers and Christian philosophers are the ones who proposed some of the solutions people believe today. As Christianity begins to spread and establish itself across Europe in the centuries after Jesus' resurrection, Augustine and Boethius

Augustine and the Locus of Collective Memory

3915 words - 16 pages tradition is already potent in the texts of its initiator, St. Augustine, but Ricoeur sees the tradition to really gain its force with Locke, Kant and Husserl. Whereas Augustine was not able to distinguish between identity, self and memory, and also lacked the conceptual tools for a transcendental definition of the word “subject”, the modern sense of “inwardness” is brought up with these later thinkers. Indeed, it is the (phenomenological) mind that

Similar Essays

My Study Notes For Final. Brief Overview Of Epictetus, Augustine, And Thomas Aquinas

685 words - 3 pages 3. Epictetus: persents nice life without afterlife. Stoics: the essential nature of humans is reason. The universe is governed not only by law or god, but by the law of reason. All that occurs, happens in accordance to Natural Law, God. Their two fundamentals are: 1. Whatever happens is the inevitable outcome of the logic of the universe. 2. Whatever happens, is for reason, and therefore is for the best. The stoic philosophy also says to remain

My Study Notes For Final. Brief Overview Of Hume, Kant, And Mill

941 words - 4 pages of facts because laws may change (we fall on the ice not all the time). We don't see causing effect, only objects. Knowledge of causes and effect gives us info about the means to obtain some end (health - end you want, exercise - means). Reason gives us info about the best means to some end but says nothing of the ends. Arguments against reason being the basis of morality: 1) moral convictions are practical providing an immediate motivation to

Analysis Of Moral Luck Views Of Aristotle And Epictetus

2268 words - 9 pages actions. Now that we examined both Aristotle's and Epictetus' perspectives, we can make a distinction between them. Aristotle is dealing with everyday philosophy and has a less strict perspective. On the other hand, Epictetus is a philosopher who is dealing with disastrous situations and has a strict perspective when compared to Aristotle. Both of their philosophies have a common base, idea of luck, but have a different continuation.

A Comparative Study On The Philosophies Of Plato And Aristotle

1803 words - 7 pages discuss the similarities and dissimilarities between Plato and Aristotle. Similarities: Aristotle drew a lot of inspiration from Plato’s theory on ideal state and citizenship. Firstly, Both Aristotle and Plato believed in the philosophy of Polis- Self sufficient and independent city states. They believed that the key role of a city state or Polis was to bring out the best in an individual and promote their moral and ethical development. In