Analysis 12 Angry Men

3337 words - 13 pages

JJ's extra session for Stasiland SAC preparationFriday, February 28th, 2014A sample topic:Despite the fall of the Berlin Wall, Stasiland exposes that many in the former GDR still harbour a sense of incarceration and entrapment. Discuss."Discuss" means: look at both sides of the argument but ultimately choose one to support more than the other.Paragraphs are based on "hooks" in the topic - parts of the topic that MUST be responded to.You may totally disagree with a topic but you still need to prove that it is NOT true.In the above topic, what MUST we have paragraphs on:1.2.Now, is there a "rebuttal" or "exceptions" point/argument you'd like to make?3.Now, form topic sentences based on those ideas and order them logically.Usually, paragraphs are ordered from obvious to not so obvious. We usually finish with the rebuttal/exceptions paragraph.Sometimes you might be able to discuss the topic through a chronological treatment of time/history, or paragraphs might be based on:Character types (but not single characters) e.g. Stasi, victims, those who want to forget the past etc.;Parts of the central idea in the topic e.g. memory = awful experiences, forgetting, remembering;Purposes of the text in relation to the topic e.g. to expose the horror of the Stasi's treatment of ordinary citizens, to show the long-term effects on sufferers; to show how it is possible to progress in life despite this.So, for our practice topic, organise the three above ideas into a logical sequence, using clear, simple, full sentences that outline ideas only. Do not name characters or events yet:1.2.3.Add linking words/cohesive ties to show the progression of points e.g.Sadly, Unfortunately, Therefore, Consequently, Most obviously, Clearly, This leads to, Undeniably, More heartbreaking perhaps is… and so on.Ultimately, your three topic sentences should make sense as a sequence and respond fully to the topic.Now, find two different examples from the text to prove the above points are true. They should come from different parts of the text, be above different people and events and should not appear too closely together in the text (shows scope of knowledge and ability to synthesise). List them above after your topic sentences.Quotes must be accurate, short and built into the grammar of your sentences. They appear WHILE you are discussing a character or event, not separately from it or in a separate sentence. It's better to use your OWN words for information, but quotes when discussing Funder's writing style. All quotes need to be analysed for tone, register, imagery and so on. This is where you might use metalanguage to describe the way the writer writes and is intending to have an emotional effect on the reader (see p. 19 of your pack and all the prose in the pack and try to find how we have built in short quotes and analysed the effect of certain writing styles on the reader)An example of a fully discussed example:"Herr Bock seems sinister and petty when he sits in 'his...

Find Another Essay On Analysis 12 angry men

12 Angry Men Essay

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men Essay

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

12 Angry Men - 1445 words

1445 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

Summary of 12 Angry Men

780 words - 4 pages This report is on a movie called, “12 Angry Men.” The movie is about 12 men that are the jury for a case where a young man is being accused of killing his father. A major conflict that is very obvious is the disagreement on whether the young boy was guilty or innocent. After court when all of the men sat down to begin their discussion Courtney B. Vance (#1) Took charge and respectfully was now the leader. He asked what everyone’s votes were

Leadership in 12 Angry Men

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

"12 Angry Men" - Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt. Juror number ten is an African American ex-Muslim male who is an angry racist man who is also suffering from the flu. He is inconsiderate of the other men and continuously shows his biases and disrespect. He attempts to lead the others, but ultimately fails. Juror number eleven is an immigrant to America and speaks about justice because he has seen it firsthand. Juror number twelve is a white male. He is advertiser and constantly

Personality Types in 12 Angry Men

1349 words - 5 pages Personality is essentially the culmination of the characteristics that make up an individual and that make the individual unique. Personality influences things such as a personas behavior and who that persona interacts with and how the interactions occur. After studying different personalities and reading the play 12 Angry Men I have a better understanding of myself and those around me. This brought me the realization that my close

Live Performance Review: 12 Angry Men

1011 words - 4 pages Review 2.12 Angry MenPlay by Reginald RosePerformed at the Scott Theatre, 7th March 2004A Masterson/Assembly Theatre ProductionDirected by Guy MastersonDirector Guy Masterson's adaptation of Reginald Rose's Pulitzer Prize-winning play, 12 Angry Men, is a surprisingly engaging and high-quality production considering the cast's inexperience; the issues it raises remain topical fifty years after it was written. The play explores the enduring themes

12 angry men movie to book analyisis

869 words - 3 pages The Fight For A LifeIn the classic story of ?12 Angry Men? originally directed by Sidney Lunnet and then by William Friedkin many characteristics shine through in both films. Both directors chose different actors, camera angles, and lighting, but the essence of the film stays the same. Each film also is greatly influenced by the time period in which they were made. Each time period is reflected in many ways throughout the story of ?12 Angry Men

Similar Essays

Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader who fought till the end. The

Film Analysis: 12 Angry Men

1060 words - 5 pages In the film 12 angry men, 12 jurors are put in a room to discuss a first degree murder case. Each one has a very different characteristic than the next, but each contribute to the stories plot line equally. Each juror can be classified as the average “every day” person; the silent but analytical, the loud and stubborn or the mediator. The one juror that is more like myself is Juror #11. I find myself to be most like him because he is unbiased

12 Angry Men Essay 1475 Words

1475 words - 6 pages stated that if he (the boy) went back to get the knife, even if it may have incriminate him, he must have covered up the evidence, rendering him guilty. In conclusion, the movie “Twelve Angry Men” illuminates many social psychology concepts, all of which allow for critical analysis and provide a platform for a better understanding of conformity, persuasion, and fundamental attribution. “Twelve Angry Men” shows there is little difference between

12 Angry Men Essay 550 Words

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a