This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Analysis Of 12 Angry Men

929 words - 4 pages

The play 12 Angry Men is one of the greatest plays I’ve seen. I read
the novel and saw both movies but my favorite was the Broadway play we
saw as a class. The play was so alive and made me really feel like I
was in the jury. The play was about a young man on trial for the
murder of his father. The play showed how one man didn’t give up in
what he believed to be true. The play also showed a powerful leader
who fought till the end.

The play was about 12 jurors coming to the same verdict. It was
eleven to one in favor of guilty. Only one juror stood up to the
eleven because of what he believed. He felt the evidence wasn’t
strong enough against the young man to convict him of murder. However
this juror wasn’t like the rest of the jury. He stood out as a
leader. What made a good leader was the way he handed him self when
the other eleven jurors were against him. He didn’t give up until the
other jurors changed their mind about the verdict. He didn’t let any
of his emotions get out of hand. He was calm and easy going didn’t
get into any arguments with the other jurors, and he explained himself
many times without getting angry with anyone. This juror, juror
number eight, was the only one who believed the young man was
innocent. He led the other jurors to understand why all the evidence
against the young man caused him to have reasonable doubt.

Juror number eight proved all the pieces of evidence brought against
the young man led to reasonable doubt. The first point he made was
when the elderly man who lived downstairs from the young man,
testified about hearing the young man say, “I’ll kill you!” Juror
number eight said people always say things they don’t mean out of
anger. Second, the old man couldn’t have possibly heard the young man
say anything because the elevated train was passing while the murder
took place. The old man from down stairs had his window open so he
wouldn’t be able to hear what was going on upstairs as he claimed he
did. Then the man from downstairs also said the young man stabbed his
father and ran out of the house. When the old man ran after the boy
he said it took him fifteen seconds. Juror number eight thought about
comparing the difference between an older man running and a young man
running because he felt the old man was lying. So when they re-acted
the whole the found out it took thirty seconds instead of fifteen.
From then on the jury thought the old man was lying about everything
he testified about. When juror number eight pointed this out he won
some jurors over to vote not guilty. This was the beginning of the
play only about three jurors changed their mind.

The knife the father...

Find Another Essay On Analysis of 12 Angry Men

12 Angry Men Essay

1475 words - 6 pages stated that if he (the boy) went back to get the knife, even if it may have incriminate him, he must have covered up the evidence, rendering him guilty. In conclusion, the movie “Twelve Angry Men” illuminates many social psychology concepts, all of which allow for critical analysis and provide a platform for a better understanding of conformity, persuasion, and fundamental attribution. “Twelve Angry Men” shows there is little difference between

12 Angry Men Essay

550 words - 2 pages 12 Angry Men: Juror #8 is the Most Important JurorJuror #8 was the most important juror in the play Twelve Angry Men for a number of reasons. The first reason is that when all the other jurors voted guilty without even thinking about their decisions, Juror #8 suggested that they talk about it before jumping to conclusions. Even when some of the other jurors got mad and started yelling at him, he stayed calm and tried to work things out in a

12 Angry Men

1776 words - 7 pages 12 Angry Men PAGE \* MERGEFORMAT 1 Running head: 12 ANGRY MEN12 Angry MenDon Carter, John Case, Cassandra SmithGrand Canyon University12 Angry MenIntroduction: In the movie "12 Angry Men" an eighteen year old boy is charged with the murder of his father. At first, all of the twelve jurors believe that he is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, except for one, who believes that they owe the boy more than five minutes in deciding if he lives or not

12 Angry Men - 909 words

909 words - 4 pages In our society today citizens play a vital role in the legal system by serving as jury. A jury is a sworn body of people convened to render an impartial verdict (a finding of fact on a question) officially submitted to them by a court, or to set a penalty or judgment (Wikipedia). 12 citizens are selected to serve as jury on a particular trial. In the movie, “12 Angry Men”, 12 ordinary citizens were called to serve as jury in a case to decide

12 Angry Men - 1167 words

1167 words - 5 pages bring about the fair and impartial administration of justice in the courtroom.12 Angry Men makes its point that only reason and fact have a place in the courtroom. With a room full of imperfect, prejudiced and unsure men, the term reasonable doubt comes into play. In a criminal case, like this, the state has the burden of proving beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant committed a crime. A reasonable doubt is an honest and reasonable

12 Angry Men - 1445 words

1445 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men is about 12 men who are the jury for an 18 year old accused murder. The judge states in the opening scene that it is a premeditated murder in the 1st degree, if found guilty will automatically receive the death penalty. The 18 year old male is accused of killing his father with a “one of a kind” switch blade, in their home. The prosecutors have several eye witness testimonies, and all of the evidence that they could need to convict

12 Angry Men

1438 words - 6 pages Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd. Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves. Within this heterogynous group are a dozen different personalities - some of which were leaders and most of which were not.      The strongest leader in this movie by far is the Architect

"12 angry men."

721 words - 3 pages that they really need to stop and think logicly about the facts in the case. The black and white film is appropriate to issues of right and wrong, a murder trial, and the death penalty. The camera work, focusing on the jurors' faces and the attitudes they reveal, and small clues about the backgrounds of individual jurors create a large canvas of twelve angry men who will decide whether the accused will live or die. Small "sub-scenes" within the

A Summary of 12 Angry Men

1425 words - 6 pages 12 Angry Men 12 Angry men is about a group of men who are appointed as jury’s. They are put in a room until they could come up with a conclusion, on whether the boy who was convicted of murder is guilty or not. Jury foremen #1 was seated at the head of the table. Portrayed as a good leader, and a thoughtful listener. When there is a quarrel between the men, he was the one who would break if off and advice them to settle down and talk about it

Leadership in 12 Angry Men

1335 words - 5 pages In the film 12 Angry Men, a group of twelve jurors are deciding the fate of a young boy accused of murdering his father. Throughout the juries dilleration, one man exhibits all of the qualities of leadership. This man is juror number 8 played by Henry Fonda. Fonda not only exhibits the the 10 qualities of a leader but he uses these qualities to lead the entire jury to a vote of not guilty (Fonda & Lumet, 1957). Early on in the film Fonda

Ignorance in 12 Angry Men

706 words - 3 pages Twelve Angry Men, is a play written by Reginald Rose. The play is about the process of individuals and a court case, which is determining the fate of a teenager. It presents the themes of justice, independence and ignorance. Rose emphasises these three themes through the characters and the dialogue. Justice is the principle of moral rightness or equity. This is shown through juror number eight who isn’t sure whether or not the boy is actually

Similar Essays

"12 Angry Men" Analysis

3308 words - 13 pages reasonable doubt. Juror number ten is an African American ex-Muslim male who is an angry racist man who is also suffering from the flu. He is inconsiderate of the other men and continuously shows his biases and disrespect. He attempts to lead the others, but ultimately fails. Juror number eleven is an immigrant to America and speaks about justice because he has seen it firsthand. Juror number twelve is a white male. He is advertiser and constantly

Analysis 12 Angry Men

3337 words - 13 pages writing techniques and provide a specific analysis of the intended meaning and effect on the reader of those choices. There must be some explicit mentioning of the impact of the writer's choices on the audience. What were the intended effects of certain portrayals (see p. 19 of the pack for a list of writing techniques)?On that point, it is a requirement of text response essays that somewhere in the essay you consider the "world" created by the

Film Analysis: 12 Angry Men

1060 words - 5 pages In the film 12 angry men, 12 jurors are put in a room to discuss a first degree murder case. Each one has a very different characteristic than the next, but each contribute to the stories plot line equally. Each juror can be classified as the average “every day” person; the silent but analytical, the loud and stubborn or the mediator. The one juror that is more like myself is Juror #11. I find myself to be most like him because he is unbiased

Summary Of 12 Angry Men Essay

780 words - 4 pages This report is on a movie called, “12 Angry Men.” The movie is about 12 men that are the jury for a case where a young man is being accused of killing his father. A major conflict that is very obvious is the disagreement on whether the young boy was guilty or innocent. After court when all of the men sat down to begin their discussion Courtney B. Vance (#1) Took charge and respectfully was now the leader. He asked what everyone’s votes were