Interrogation is a method commonly used by the Army to acquire information from a suspected individual or groups. The aim of this process is to make the individual to confess or give up information that can lead to recovery of personnel or protect against future dangers. Interrogations can be used in numerous ways to gather information. The U.S. Army has been involved in various Intelligence collection around the world especially since the September 11, 2001 attack, and it has been forced interrogate people for leading information to unravel various security threats. Some of the interrogation methods include deception, torture, suggestibility, and the use of mind-altering drugs. Before any Interrogation technique is used, it should be analyzed through ethical lenses. Interrogation could be viewed as torture but some people would agree that in order to save lives, we must proceed with these types of techniques to gather information. This paper gives an analysis of interrogation methods used and the extent to which these methods can be seen as oppressive.
Since the attacks on September 11 2001, the global out cry about the US Army activities prompted the president Obama to stress the need for the Soldiers undertaking interrogation activities to observe the procedures that were laid down. These procedures have been clearly outlined in the Army Field Manual 2-22.3, Human Intelligence Collector Operations, on interrogation that many of the involved Soldiers have openly defied. The nature of the interrogation activities brings up a debate about the procedure for interrogation because other US government agencies are involved in such activities. The factor that drives the debate about amending the interrogation rules is based on the coercive interrogations that have been labeled against the Army and the intelligence agencies in the recent past (Ishmael, 2010).
When following the Rules Lenses, U.S. military intelligence doctrine states that interrogation is: “The systematic effort to procure information to answer specific collection requirements by direct and indirect questioning techniques of a person who is in the custody of the forces conducting the questioning.” This implies that the Army for its good can use any method that is worthy yielding information. This open definition does not limit the extent to which the Soldiers can practice the activity. However, the field manual requires that the interrogation be carried out in a lawful manner, but limited to the intelligence requirements. It is important to note that the Army establishes the intelligence requirements. According to the Rules Outcome, President Obama has implemented Executive Order, which limits the manner in which the prisoner must be treated humanely. This can cause a problem for the Soldier that is charged with carrying out the mission and the fact that the rules places restraints on mission accomplishment. This can ultimately cause a conflict.