This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Analytical Exposition By Currer Bell. Comparing Two Film Versions Of Macbeth (Polanski And Wrights Version) And Concluding Which Is More Appropriate For A Year Twelve Audience.

1228 words - 5 pages

There's no art,To find the play's construction in the film.Boys, parties, schoolies, formal, friends and schoolwork. All vital aspects of Year Twelve which most students have under control. However when faced with seventeenth century Shakespeare, students’ self-assurance suddenly plummets. Self-confessed Shakespeare hopeless Kate Fitzpatrick explores two potentially helpful films for a younger audience.Shakespeare’s play Macbeth has been reconstructed time and time again throughout the ages using various media. Two film interpretations, Roman Polanski’s 1971 classic and Geoffrey Wright’s 2007 modernised version, have construed contrasting attitudes and values whilst still accurately representing the original text. However, for a teenage audience, Wright’s modern interpretation would be more suitable than the classic version, due to Wright’s contemporary context and discourses.Wright utilises the context to appeal directly to a young audience, relating to them through technological innovations, the manipulation of sex, drugs and alcohol, effective costuming, use of violence and various film techniques, whilst simultaneously giving viewers an insight into the play’s basic principles. In contrast, Polanski’s version constantly foregrounds kingship, chaos and a patriarchal world view.These discourses accurately represent Shakespeare’s original intended reading, however they do little for a young audience striving to understand the play, as they represent drastically outdated values and beliefs from the 17th century.Violence is a discourse which is evident in both films, yet it is foregrounded differently by the directors. Shakespeare’s original text represents some violence, but it is not as dire as the directors’ depiction. Director of 90’s thriller Romper Stomper, Wright claims that he “wanted to make the most gruesome and violent film in Australian history, and have it censored”.If he did not achieve this, he was not far from it. Audiences are left sick to their stomach after scenes such as the initial gunning down of the Asian gang, the violent stabbing of Duncan, Banquo’s brutal murder by ‘back-stabbing’ and (who could forget) the final gory scene that contains enough fake blood to give haematophobics a heart attack.In this segment, a recurring colour scheme of red, white and black is strongly manifested, whilst slow motion filming and harmonic music is used to draw emotion. These effects accentuate the violent theme. In the final showdown, Macbeth and Macduff opt for fisticuffs rather than shooting. Here, human combat is designed to resonate more deeply with viewers.Wright effectively manipulates the violent theme by privileging the attitude of revenge. This aspect is strongly foregrounded by Wright and is a crucial contributor to the discourse of violence.Polanski also evokes a violent reading of the text, possibly due to his troubled experiences earlier in...

Find Another Essay On Analytical exposition by Currer Bell. Comparing two film versions of Macbeth (Polanski and Wrights version) and concluding which is more appropriate for a year twelve audience.

Comparing Two Great Directors: Roman Polanski and Pedro Almodovar

1905 words - 8 pages Comparing two great directors I. Introduction What is mise en scene? When speaking of movies today, mise en scene is a well-used term. If you want to translate it, I think the best translation would be “put in the scene”. Mise en scene generally means everything within the shot, everything that the camera is showing. Mise-en-scene is all about the film staging, all that is visible in front of the camera and all its design included; trim, music

Comparison of Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet

1115 words - 4 pages Comparison of Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet Shakespeare’s play ‘Romeo and Juliet’ was made into a film by two different directors. Baz Luhrmann’s to Franco Zeffirelli’s interpretation of Romeo and Juliet were very distinct and they both appeal to different age group audiences. Franco Zeffirelli’s version was the first film of Romeo and Juliet. It was produced in 1968 and it was quiet typical, exactly what

Comparing "For Whom the Bell Tolls" and "A Farewell to Arms" which are both by Ernest Hemingway

2546 words - 10 pages more closely in order for us to understand it better.In A Farewell to Arms and For Whom the Bell Tolls, we see how the main character is, in the beginning, a cold and sometimes insensitive person who loves the idea of war. In Arms, we see how Henry is a calm, calculating man who tries to live up to the Western impression of how a man should act. In American history, men have tried to reassociate themselves with a deeper meaning of manhood as a way

Two Film Versions of Shakespeare's Romeo and Juliet

1334 words - 5 pages of portraying Romeo and Juliet, and the two most popular film versions portray two very different styles of this one play. Zeferelli's Romeo and Juliet was made in the 1970s, and is the film version most commonly shown in high school classrooms. The newest film version of this play is Baz Luhrmanns Romeo and Juliet. This version sets the classic story in a modern day setting. Both versions, while different stylistically, hold true to the basic

Comparing The Positives And Negatives Of The Film Version And The Book Version Of Death Of A Salesman

743 words - 3 pages exiting through a door or into thin air (as ghosts will do). The set design also changes, by way of the coloring. When it is a flashback, the coloring is faded, helping the viewer to distinguish the difference between past and present.In conclusion, the film version has more positive aspects than does that of the text. The film keeps the viewer/reader from becoming confused, leading to a better understanding of the play. The original views of the author are better integrated in the text, but being able to see what is going on, more than makes up for the loss, in the mind of the viewers.

Comparing Novel and Film Version of Snow Falling on Cedars

2293 words - 9 pages Comparing Novel and Film Version of Snow Falling on Cedars It is no easy task to create a work - through writing or film - that has an impact on society. In writing, one must discuss and analyze a relevant topic that will have an impact on the readers. One must also present stunning sensory images through words in order to create a complete understanding for the reader. In filmmaking it is not much different, but there must be

Compare the play "Pygmalion" by George Bernard Shaw with its film version "My fair lady". Which do you find more effective work of art and why. Use quotes

1908 words - 8 pages accustomed”. Even though she says quite firmly she would teach phonetics, it is obvious for the audience that teaching phonetics is not what she really wanted. So what the movie shows more clearly is that Eliza does indeed have options and that Higgins is afraid he will be without her. So what makes the ending of this movie such an attraction to the audience is that Eliza comes back to Higgins as a choice of her own and not as a need. Which is in

Comparing the Two Versions of To Build a Fire

1094 words - 4 pages , Cloudesly Johns, explaining his philosophy on good fiction writing. This letter is an invaluable resource when studying the work of Jack London, especially when comparing the two versions of "To Build a Fire." London emphasized quite a bit in this letter with many exclamation points and capital letters. That was only because of the passion with which he was writing about writing. His main point was to not be to scientific, or "empirically" (530

Consider how the monster is portrayed In Mary Shelley's Frankenstein and the Two film versions of Frankenstein

4474 words - 18 pages the error of his ways. At the beginning of the story, Frankenstein begins to advise Walton and he tells him to realise that what he is doing is destroying his crew. By the end, Walton has decided that he cannot go on and he turns back and heads for home, which is exactly what Frankenstein should have done, a long time ago.For this assignment I have been studying Mary Shelley's novel and the two film versions of Frankenstein.This first film in

Comparing the Opening Sections of Kenneth Branagh's and Franco Zeffirelli's Film Versions of Hamlet

3846 words - 15 pages Comparing the Opening Sections of Kenneth Branagh's and Franco Zeffirelli's Film Versions of Hamlet So exactly why is it that Hamlet is still so popular with our modern day audiences when it was written for the naïve audiences of the 17th century? Personally I believe this is because Hamlet deals with many fresh issues including corruption, love and the supernatural, which still appeal to contemporary audiences. These

Compare and Contrast of Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet Analysis

1107 words - 4 pages happen next. Upon actually entering the church, Juliet is front and center lying on a raised alter, dressed in white, with dozens of lit candles and religious statues surrounding her, except for the clear path Romeo can reach her by. It’s a very emotional moment as we see the shock on Romeo’s face. Using a gun instead of knife in the scene also made it much more dramatic. Zeffirelli’s version often contradicts Luhrmann’s excitement so it appears

Similar Essays

Comparing Two Film Versions Of Romeo And Juliet

585 words - 2 pages For my media coursework I am going to compare the first 8-9 minutes of two versions of 'Romeo and Juliet'. The first is by Franco Zeffirelli filmed in 1968 and the second is by Baz Luhrmann filmed in 1996. They both use Shakespeare's language but they are very differently presented. The Zeffirelli version made in 1968 is set in a traditional setting because it is in Verona in Italy in the 1400's as Shakespeare set it. The Luhrmann interpretation

A Comparison Of Two Film Versions Of Romeo And Juliet By Zefferelli And Luhrmann

3385 words - 14 pages A Comparison of Two Film Versions of Romeo and Juliet by Zefferelli and Luhrmann One is by the more authentic director Franco Zefferelli and one is by the more modern money-seeking director Baz Lurmann. The major differences between the two movies Romeo and Juliet who were made by Franco Zefferelli in 1968 and

Comparing Two Film Versions Of A Midsummer Night's Dream By William Shakespeare

1390 words - 6 pages , Kelvin Klein, Rupert Everett and Calista Flockhart. The second was a budget film made for channel 4 by Royal Shakespeare Company. Adrian Noble was the producer and the film was made in 1994. It was much more surrealistic because this version of the film was based on a young boy's dream. Setting The biggest difference between the two film is the setting and place. The Hoffman film was filmed in Umbria, Italy, but the

Comparing The Presentation Of Two Film Versions Of The Prologue To Romeo And Juliet

3017 words - 12 pages impossible for a love story between 'two feuding' family to be long lived as peaceful and violent world collides, a somewhat apocalyptic setting is created. Alternatively Zeffirelli's 1968 version is situated in the calm, relaxing, and medieval atmosphere of Verona, Italy in the 16th century (no surprise there)! The audience impression of the film would be for it to stay extremely acute to original Elizabethan script, as it is set