This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Animal Experimentation Is Necessary Essay

1607 words - 6 pages

   A contingent of those against the dog labs at the university protested last month, waving signs that read, "Kill? Heal? What's It Gonna Be?" and "The U Kills Dogs."  A fairly recent article in the Washington Post ("A Terminal Learning Environment"; Nov.  5, 2000) manages to move beyond the emotion and sloganeering used by these protesters to some of the real arguments of those in opposition; that the dog labs are "cruel, unnecessary and a waste of money" and that they "should be eliminated."1   However, the arguments used by the Washington Post (and ultimately, those in opposition) are insufficient to justify the termination of the dog labs at university.  The claim that the dog labs are cruel to the animals is unsubstantiated and inaccurate.  The claim that the labs are unnecessary is a falsity, as alternatives are not as beneficial as the vivisection labs.  Finally, the argument that the labs are a waste of money is an ill-researched, erroneous depiction of the real circumstances.

       The dog labs are held annually at the University, on five consecutive Fridays in the early spring.  In the lab, students insert catheters, draw blood, inject drugs, perform minor surgery and observe the cardiovascular systems of seventy-two deeply anesthetized dogs.  At the end of the lab, the dogs are euthanized.  The purposes of this lab are to help teach the basic concepts of physiology, give students the opportunity to observe the effects of some commonly used drugs, and to provide students with a "hands-on" experience working with live patients.  Students are given the option of not participating, but are still responsible for learning the material presented in the lab.  This year, thirty students (out of one hundred and thirty-two) opted to skip the lab, which prompts the question: Why not more?

       The argument used by the Washington Post that the labs are cruel to the dogs, because of the "questionable" source of the animals, is completely unsubstantiated.  The Daily was very upset to learn that the universtiy obtains its dogs from C.C. Baird, a class-B animal dealer (one who buys dogs, rather than raising them) with a "history of violating the Animal Welfare Act."  The Daily states that Baird obtains his animals from "random sources," who, in turn, are suspected of stealing people's pets to furnish the animals to the dealer. 2  This argument is unfounded and not to be believed.  First of all, there is absolutely no proof that the university is using stolen pets in these labs.  The dogs are instead purchased from vendors who are approved by the US Department of Agriculture.  These approved vendors, like C.C. Baird, get the dogs from pounds and kennels, where the unwanted animals are, unfortunately, destined to be euthanized anyway.  While it is correct that C.C. Baird has previously violated some aspects of the Animal Welfare Act, he has since made the necessary improvements and ultimately has been approved by the USDA.  Baird would...

Find Another Essay On Animal Experimentation is Necessary

In the 21 Century is animal testing really necessary? - essay

666 words - 3 pages .” - Animal testing alternatives are also eco-friendly as the corpses of animals tested on are germ-ridden and dangerous. To conclude, animal testing not necessary in the twenty-first century in all cases. Mainly this is because it is hugely unfair to put animals through immense pain and suffering for our own good. Also, with the fantastic alternatives available, there is no excuse to still test on animals. Animals are not ours, they do

This is an essay on animal experimentation, specializing in the Cosmetic section

810 words - 3 pages sell the product with dodgy results.Charles R. Magel quoted, "Ask the experimenters why they experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are like us.' Ask the experimenters why it is morally okay to experiment on animals, and the answer is: 'Because the animals are not like us.' Animal experimentation rests on a logical contradiction."We all need to realize the difference, and move on with new experiments not involving

Animal Testing is Necessary, but Should All Testing of Pharmaceuticals be Carried Out on Animals?

931 words - 4 pages /History_of_animal_testing> - Author Unknown, 2010,‘What is an LD50 and LC50’, viewed 18 April 2010, - Author Unknown, 2010, ‘The Joys of Animal Testing and Experimentation’, viewed 19 May 2010, - Author Unknown, 2010, Bioengineering Tissues as an Alternative to Animal Testing, viewed 17 April 2010, - Author Unknown,2010, ‘Are Animal

Animal Experimentation

809 words - 3 pages For years now people have been using animal experimentation to create new ways to help save the human race. There are people who believe that it does help, and that it is necessary to continue, while others oppose and want to fight for the elimination of animal experimentation. Scientists fight for the cures needed to help man kind, but struggle to do so as people fight against their work in progress. But as Jennifer A. Hurley stated, “History

The Necessity of Animal Testing

1299 words - 5 pages and suffering (“Animal Research Is Unethical and Scientifically Unnecessary”). Although the arguments against animal experimentation seem credible, animal testing on medicines and products are necessary in order to insure the safety of human beings. The types of experiments performed at the University of Buffalo and the University of California depicts just some of the few horrors of animal testing. According to the article, during these

Animal Experimentation

812 words - 3 pages another animal experimentation has helped all of our lives. We should be grateful to the animals for all that they have done for us. Using animals for research is very necessary, but should be kept conservative. Slaying animals to duplicate already proven experiments is wasteful and disrespectful toward animal lives.

Pros of Animal Experimentation

1242 words - 5 pages Although not as strictly addressed, there is still a schism when it comes to the matters of experimentation involving animals. Those in opposition of it see it as being against the will of the animal, because animals have no say in the matter. However, through animal experimentation there has been vast medical advances in hospitals and veterinarians , research has led to cures for various diseases that would normally take many more years to cure

Animal Experimentation

1540 words - 6 pages both sides of the argument, although I agree with the ideology that ‘“all animals are equal” and that the suffering of an animal is morally equal to the suffering of a human being (225),”’ I agree with Jerod M. Loeb’s ideology and strongly believe that animal experimentation is necessary to develop new medicine for the welfare of humans, for the benefit of animals, and advance in scientific knowledge to prevent future diseases. One of the reasons

The Pros of Animal Experimentation

1148 words - 5 pages Since 300 B.C., animal testing has been happening all over the world. As time has drawn on, people have made this a huge controversial topic and have debated whether or not animal experimentation is acceptable or not acceptable in today’s society. With everything progressing around us, what effect would animal experimentation have on the United States? In fact, scratch that and instead ask this question instead: what would the effects of animal

Animal Research: A Necessary Evil

933 words - 4 pages It has long been debated as to whether it is ethical to use animals for experimentation. When considering whether animal research is ethically acceptable or not two main concerns must be raised. The first issue is whether it is absolutely necessary to use animals in order to acquire information that may contribute to the improvement of people’s health and well-being. The second issue is whether the use of animals is defendable on a moral

Should Animal Experimentation Ever Be Permitted?

1931 words - 8 pages Physicians are known to have performed vivisection on animals for hundreds of years, and nowadays animal testing remains an essential element of research in medicine and pharmacology. Animal experimentation has generated heated discussions among scientists, philosophers, and politicians. This issue is very controversial, since it involves ethical questions. While it is generally accepted that testing cosmetics on animals is unnecessary and

Similar Essays

Animal Experimentation Is Ethical And Necessary

1168 words - 5 pages experimentation has been helpful in leading researchers to immense expanses in invaluable scientific discovery (Ericson para 9) Most medical breakthroughs of the twentieth century included animal testing in some manner (Saraf 6). Even though there are numerous guidelines and protocols that enforce the ethical treatment of laboratory animals, it is still a particularly controversial issue to animal rights activists and the general public

Argument Essay Animal Testing Is Necessary

1675 words - 7 pages Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessaryIs it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on (People for the Ethical

Why Animal Capativity Is A Necessary Evil

1067 words - 5 pages the zooplankton and came up with ways to make sure the zooplankton benefitted. The same methods can be applied to multiple species, and represent positive results which would not only aide in the preservation of the species studied, but could also benefit man’s education of wildlife. Although animal captivity negatively affects the mental health of animals, it is necessary to keep animals in captivity. The lessons learned from the animals in

Needless Animal Research, Testing, And Experimentation Is Wrong

964 words - 4 pages Needless Animal Experimentation is Wrong   If penicillin had been tested on guinea pigs, it might never have reached the public. It is lethal to guinea pigs, deactivates the blood system of rabbits and is deadly to cats ("Bio-Medical Research"). Scientists are pushing for more experiments regardless of the cost to the animal's life. "One expense is the involvement of killing animals in the pursuit of a pine-scented air freshener"(Vergoth