Animal Moral Rights Essay

794 words - 4 pages

Micheal Pollan , a writer for the New York Times magazine published an article on November 10, 2002. “An Animals place”, Concerning the moral issue whether or not its right to consume meat as humans. Pollan also introduces a Peter Singer’s argument, which is very straightforward. Based on equality, We humans are not all equal: “Some are smarter than others, better looking, and more gifted. (Pollan 2). The main idea is to comprehend that “Everyone’s interests should receive equal consideration regardless of what abilities they may posses. (Pollan 2). This is where a question arises and a parallel problem swings along. If one individual has more intelligence and uses another individual for ...view middle of the document...

Pollan appeals to autortity: an argument that defers to the authority of an individual, precedent, convention, etc. Steve Davis, an animal scientist at Oregon State University has estimated that in the case that America adopts a strictly vegetarian diet, the total number of animals killed every year would actually increase. Davis contends that if our goal is to kill as few animals as possible, then it would be pointless if we stop eating them because it appears that killing animals is unavoidable no matter what we eat. Animal rights activists don’t realize the consequences that will occur after humans stop consuming animals, that’s what Pollan is hinting to. Animal activists should take the effects into consideration and re-evaluate their claims.
“My first line of defense was obvious. Animals will kill one another all the time. Why treat animals more ethically than they treat one another? (Ben Fraklin) “If you eat one another, I don’t see why we may not eat you.” (Pollan). Whether or not we eat animals they will still eat each other how can animal rights activists stop that? Which brings another interesting claim that Pollan bought, People should work for animal welfare rather than animal rights. Animals use each other a source of food, what difference does it make if humans consume them. If humans stop...

Find Another Essay On Animal moral rights

Use and misuse of animals Essay

1757 words - 7 pages neither humans nor rodents possess rights or that rodents possess all the rights that human possess" (Cohen: 867). "Refusing to recognize the moral differences among species is a sure path to calamity," as Cohen continues (868). This calamity will be the use of humans in ways animals are being used and the 25 million years of evolution of human life and values will surely go to dust.Some critics, the animal people, argue that if rights require being

ANIMAL RIGHTS Essay

867 words - 3 pages justification for regarding the pain (or pleasure) that animals feel as less importance than the same amount of pain felt by humans” (15). This portrays the rights and equality the animals may possess comparison to humans. Along with Singer, Jeremy Bentham in Animal Liberation integrated the essential foundation of moral equality into his system of ethics by means of the principle: that the essential basis of equity is for “each to count for one and none

Animal Dilemma

989 words - 4 pages and researchers are dealt with the moral problem of a choosing between the wellbeing of humans and the wellbeing of animals. Some supporters of animal testing argue that the moral rights and principles apply only to human beings. (NVCC) Animal experimenters should try to aim to the highest levels of animal wellbeing in their laboratories, using anesthetics whenever possible and keeping animals in clean, happy, in good physical shape, and living

The Necessity of Animal Testing

1299 words - 5 pages experimentations the eyes of monkeys were implanted with metal coils into their eye sockets in order to study movement ("Update: Animal Testing"). Often times animals are tested upon in laboratories, living in cold isolated environments. The moral aspect of the debate, is whether or not animals should be utilized and later euthanized for the purpose of human benefit, especially when only one party decides. As a result of the physical and emotional

Animal Rights

1261 words - 6 pages Animal rights, also referred to as animal liberation, is the idea that the most basic interests of non-human animals should be afforded the same consideration as the similar interests of human beings.[3] Advocates approach the issue from different philosophical positions, but agree that animals should be viewed as non-human persons and members of the moral community, and should not be used as food, clothing, research subjects, or entertainment

Experimentation

602 words - 2 pages Animals have been used in medical research for centuries. Most of the animals used for research are rodents - rats, mice, hamsters and gerbils. Some dogs, cats and a variety of goats, ferrets, pigeons, monkeys and rabbits are also used .The struggle against this tyranny is a struggle as important as any of the moral and social issues that have been fought over in recent years. Animal rights are an emotional issue-second only, perhaps, to the

The Ethics of Animal Use in Biomedical Research

1986 words - 8 pages .” More recently, Tom Regan made a similar point. He argues that if a theory deems human pain and suffering morally valuable, but denies the moral relevance of animal pain and suffering, then it seems to be rationally defective. Pain is pain, and pain is in itself undesirable, to whomever it may occur, whether animal or human. Tom Regan tries to ground animal status in rights so as to make them unalienable. This Neo-Kantian position on the issue

My Response to Jeremy Rifkin's "A Change of Heart about Animals"

569 words - 2 pages . There are two types or rights; legal and moral rights. Legal rights are comulgated by law making part of government. Moral rights are stems from reason and worth for example life, liberty and pursuit of happiness. I believe animals share both rights because the only difference between human beings and animals is basically the ability to speak. Every single day I experience commercials about animal abuse. For example, the ASPCA commercials

Animal Moralities and Human Negligence

1213 words - 5 pages . They shows animals as objects. The treatment of these creature are wrong because it violates the right to animals. The people who uses these animals are affecting the moral status of the animals. The concept of animals rights lies on the eradication of the practice of animal in science, the termination of animal industries farming, and the elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping because it will help and protect our creatures

Stress

5452 words - 22 pages of animal exploitation, but she argues that "total victory, like checkmate, cannot be achieved in one move," and that we must endorse the moral orthodoxy of animal welfare as involving necessary "steps in the direction" of animal rights. [FN5] Newkirk argues that animal welfare facilitates a "springboard into animal rights." [FN6] Similarly, Animal Rights International's Henry Spira maintains that animal rights theory requires an "all or nothing

Animal Experimentation

889 words - 4 pages science and human health are undeniable”. He uses animals for his own research. With animal testing, scientists discovered insulin, vaccines, and treatments for cancer and other diseases. Also, they were able to understand more about the diseases that don't have a cure yet to create one. Research facilities would say that they only use few animals, so it's only a small consequence. Ringach points out is that animals don't have rights. He states

Similar Essays

Animal Rights Essay

1285 words - 5 pages obscene inhumane ways; the poor animals are suffering through pain and distress, even though they have moral status and rights. A right is a particular way of protecting interests, to say that an interest is protected by a right, is to say that interest is protected against being ignored or violated simple because this will benefit someone else. So what are animal rights? Animal rights is the idea that animals have the same rights as humans, to

On Animal Experiments Essay

862 words - 4 pages , cause pain to them or even reduce their living quality (HOPES, 2010). This brings attention to the justification of animal experiments. The moral status of animals and the benefit are highly controversial parts of the concern. Against animal experiments Most people would agree that animals have some kind of moral status. This presents a shift of view from past that animals had no moral status and respecting them was merely for protecting human

Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Essay

987 words - 4 pages .” (Garner, 69) The range of ages in the test subjects runs from old to a fetus. It is this that should make people ask themselves if animal testing is ethical. Animals have rights just like every other being. ( Regan, 1) On the other hand animals shouldn’t be rights because they are not moral creatures said Damon Linker. (Linker, 1) But shouldn’t we be the moral and ethical ones? An interesting point was brought up by Robert Gardner, a

This Is A Paper On Animal Rights, Specifically From The Viewpoint Of Philosopher Tom Regan

772 words - 3 pages -evaluation.Regan's description of our direct duties to animals illustrates the difference between his argument and most of his contractarian critics. It is hard to dispute the fact that animals don't feel pain, as it is equally hard to argue the moral justification for causing pain and suffering to anyone or anything in this world. However, Regan says that supporting kindness to animals in no way guarantees the support of animal rights; I agree