Justifying Animal Rights
In this society, it is under law for all people have the basic rights under the universal declaration of human rights. As stated, this only benefits humans, where humans rule the world. So where does the rights of animals come from? Many people do not understand animal rights and how we should treat them equally and why. Through animal research and experimentations, humans are getting benefit and gains in the obscene inhumane ways; the poor animals are suffering through pain and distress, even though they have moral status and rights.
A right is a particular way of protecting interests, to say that an interest is protected by a right, is to say that interest is protected against being ignored or violated simple because this will benefit someone else. So what are animal rights? Animal rights is the idea that animals have the same rights as humans, to live free of suffrage, just as important as living individuals, and with the same moral status as humans. According to Doris Lin, an animal rights attorney and the Vice President of Legal Affairs for the Bear Education and Resource Group, “They have a right to be free of oppression, confinement, use and abuse by humans.” However, rights are not absolute in the sense that their protection has no exception. David DeGrazia, the author of many scholarly animal rights books dealing ethical and philosophical issues, explained that animal rights might be unfamiliar to most people because of the daily abuses and killing toward animals that are viewed as socially acceptable, and unconsciously ignored due to normal day-to-day activities and even festivals with animal killings for fun. (12) Animal abuses can be ranged from animal experimentations and testings, cosmetic testings, live animal shootings, to abuses of farm animals, these abuses are widespread and are considerably immoral and inhumane.
Animals have moral status and moral rights as much as humans does, however it might seem less important compared to humans, even though animals are not thought of as machines and property. Gary L. Francione has respectfully argued that animals and humans are individuals, where both are living creatures, but because of the idea that they can not think rationally or abstractly, that makes many believe it to be acceptable to treat them as property. (xxviii) Even young children or mentally handicapped people can not think rationally or abstractly, yet no one would think of putting them through biomedical experiments, or a source of food. (xxix) In Gill Langley’s way of theological thinking, religiously in a way, animals lack souls. Having no obvious logical connection between these “facts” and the judgement that it would be wrong to do somethings to humans that it would not be wrong to do to animals. (25) Animals do not exist for humans and our uses, they have the same moral status as humans and are to be treated well with respect, for their own sake, because they have moral...