This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Animal Rights And Euthanasia Essay

2022 words - 8 pages

Animal RightsAnimal rights is a topic that has been debated for an extremely long time. Many argue for and against it without having any grounds to why they feel either way. The majority does not even know what animal rights entails and therefore a valid argument cannot be made. By exploring what animal rights really means, arguments for and against them can arise; thus allowing the moral implications behind each argument to be seen.Defining animal rights depends seriously on how one views the issue as a whole. Lewis Vaughn writes:"The traditional attitude toward animals is that they are merely resources that humans dispose of as they see fit; animals have instrumental value only. But many reject this traditional view and put forward reasons for supposing that animals have moral status…a suitable candidate for moral concern or respect in its own right" (Vaughn, 564)Therefore according to Vaughn, how one views an animal morally can strongly dictate how one views their rights as animals. For example Peter Singer has one of the most famous arguments for animal rights based on his view that animals have moral rights to happiness and therefore should be treated as moral agents. Likewise it is equally important to look at arguments against animal rights to see the differences within each.Peter Singer believes strongly in Bentham Mill's view on happiness. Happiness should be whatever causes one the most amount of pleasure, free from pain. This view is the basis of Singer's argument for animal rights. Singer's argument in a nutshell consists of this:Animals can feel pain.If anything can feel pain it is a moral agent and should be treated with moral consideration.Therefore an animal is a moral agent and should be treated with moral consideration.The main goal of his argument is to show that humans and animals are equal in their necessity for moral consideration based on the pleasure they experience free from suffering. Singer writes, "If a being suffers, there can be no moral justification for refusing to take that suffering into consideration. No matter what the nature of the being…" (568). Therefore animals should be treated with respect to their right to a life free of suffering caused by actions of humans or anything else for that matter. Singer draws no real line in his distinction between animals and humans, saying they both deserve the same consideration to be treated morally just and thus show no real differences.Yet at the same token there is an argument against animal rights as well. If one was arguing against animal rights they could use a deontological view point. According to deontology one has a right or an obligation to act in a certain way. In the Bible in the book of Genesis, God tells Adam and Eve to "Be fruitful and multiply, fill the earth and conquer it. Be masters of the fish of the sea, the birds of the heaven and all living creatures on earth" "Genesis 1:28). Therefore if one has a moral duty to follow God's words...

Find Another Essay On Animal Rights and Euthanasia

The History and Purpose of The Animal Rights Movement

977 words - 4 pages As of today PETA is one group that is helping animals in barbaric situation like that of professional research laboratories. In these laboratories, the staff treats animals inhumanly where chemicals are poured onto the animal causing burns and sores. According to, animal rights are the rights to humane treatment claimed on behalf of animals, especially the right not to be exploited for human purposes. This movement in America traces

Animal Rights and the Dominant Worldview toward Animals

1890 words - 8 pages for animals? What rights should animals have? This paper will be showing two different worldviews - the dominant and the biocentric worldviews with respect to animal rights. It will explore the moral and ethical issues raised by human superiority over animals. I will argue for the biocentric worldview, in favour of animal rights as I will focus on two main ideas: equality and suffering. This paragraph will be showing the dominant worldview

Summary of "The Case for Animal Rights" Summary and Response Paper. This was written about the story "The Case for Animal Rights" by Tom Regan

707 words - 3 pages Summary of "The Case for Animal Rights" In "The Case for Animal Rights," Tom Regan writes about his beliefs regarding animal rights. Regan states the animal rights movement is committed to a number of goals, including: "the total abolition of the use of animals in science; the total dissolution of commercial animal agriculture; and the total elimination of commercial and sport hunting and trapping. Regan goes on and tells us the

Animal Rights: Do they deserve life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness?

862 words - 4 pages Do animals deserve the natural rights humans have? Animals are being kept captive in science labs to test many things. In research labs they are used to test many trivial products and they are used in valuable medical research. Many animal right activists go as far as breaking the law as an attempt to get the point across about the wellbeing of animals in science labs. The welfare of animals should be considered in experiments, although

Do Animals Have A Say?: Comparative Analysis of Animal Rights, Human Wrongs and Proud to be Speciecist

1437 words - 6 pages The subject of animal testing for human advantages has always been a debatable topic. It is still undecided whether the use of animals for human benefits is morally right. On the other hand it is scientists and researchers who think that animals are good testing subjects because of various reasons such as preventing harmful products or finding cures to diseases. The two essays “Animal Rights, Human Wrongs” by Tom Regan and “Proud to be

What is the role of the Australian Legal System in establishing rights, responsibilities and values? Discuss this in relevence to the Euthanasia debate

1619 words - 6 pages It is the role of a legal system to establish rights and responsibilities, and to uphold society's values. It is a given fact, however, that society's values will shift and change with the sands of time and, therefore, so too must the rights and responsibilities associated with those values.The most basic of rights granted to Australian citizens are contained within the Constitution. These include the right to vote in local, state and federal

4 page report disputing animal rights by providing facts and combating the oppositions main points of attack, Includes citations and a works cited

871 words - 3 pages Animal RightsDo animals deserve to have the same rights as humans? Over the past few years activist groups such as PETA have been trying to prove that they do. I feel that animals do not have the same rights as people and should continue to be used in experimentation and product testing. The following sources will be used to proof my point and counter the opposition's arguments.The First source I found was the online BrainyEncyclopedia website

Animal Rights is the title of this persuasive paper. It includes thesis, topics and clincher,and its about the three main reasons why animal research should not be allowed. 800 words

580 words - 2 pages , period. And violence is the opposite of reverence for life", said Liska O'Connor in the same book.Most of what we do to animals we would not do to people. This is only because humans have rights, the same rights we keep taking away from animals. Because it's cruel and inhumane, it's not always accurate, and often unnecessary, you can see why animal research should not be allowed.

Should euthanasia be decriminalised?

1013 words - 4 pages conclusion, euthanasia is not a new creation but an accepted practice within medical care of animals. Animal rights supporters do not protest against it. The strongest argument in favour of euthanasia is that of the people who are terminally ill, suffering unbearable pain, have a poor quality of life and can endure no more. No one would make the decision to end their life without full consent from family and friends. If death is inevitable to have

Justification for Physician Assisted Suicide

960 words - 4 pages legal rights. As long as it is an individual’s own decision and the pain they are suffering is incurable, euthanasia can be justified. The opposition might argue against euthanasia because the practice of euthanasia can go against the will of god. With major religions like Christianity, Islam and Judaism prohibiting suicide, they consider euthanasia as a sinful act. Their point of view is that the person or doctor assisting someone to

The Debate On Euthanasia (Oral)

1023 words - 4 pages doctor's because they know of their patient's intentions. Euthanasia does not only apply to humans it can also extend to domestic animals such as cats or dogs. It can apply when the animal is hopelessly sick and it is killed as a relatively painless way of death. Euthanasia is only permitted for domestic animals with the intention of granting the animal mercy from their hopelessly sick situation.In 1995 the Northern Territory became the country's

Similar Essays

Animal Rights And Conditions Essay

2402 words - 10 pages concerned. Animals as living creatures, should have rights to protect themselves. If animals don’t have rights to keep them out of harm’s way then they can be easily taken advantage of because they don’t have a voice to be heard. The goal of this research is to bring awareness to the ways animals are used in medical research and cosmetic testing, the conditions they face in factory farms, as well as their welfare in slaughter houses, also the rights

Vegetarianism And Animal Rights Essay

2485 words - 10 pages Hindu and Buddhist were advocating a vegetarian diet for ethical reasons. One of the most important reasons why people decided not to consume meat is a “Do not harm” principle. People should not make animals suffer and experience pain because animals deserve the same level of respect as people. Even though people started to think of vegetarianism and animal rights movements a long time ago, these movements became popular only in the early 1970s. In

Animal Rights And The Food Industry

2852 words - 11 pages Ethics 400Ethical Treatment of AnimalsThe issue of animal rights is very complex. When referring to the ethical treatment of animals, it seems as though everyone has an opinion. Some people are "meat eaters" and consume meat at nearly every meal. They may argue that this is survival and is justified; they would further argue that animals are not humans and were put on this earth for the benefit of man. Many also believe that it is necessary to

Looking At The Rights And Wrongs Of Euthanasia

1039 words - 4 pages Looking at the Rights and Wrongs of Euthanasia In my essay I will look at the rights and wrongs of euthanasia and look at it from the points of two different major religious groups. The first religion I will look at is Christianity. Christians believe that euthanasia is wrong because each persons suffering is caused because God believes that person has done something wrong and deserves to be punished. The second