Animal Testing Is Necessary, But Should All Testing Of Pharmaceuticals Be Carried Out On Animals?

931 words - 4 pages

Animals have been used for pharmaceutical testing throughout history. The Greeks in early BC were the first to carry out animal testing using live animals to test experiments and different medicines on. (
Animal testing has provided many positives to human lives but is still a controversial issue. Some people believe that animal testing is unnecessary and alternatives should be considered. Others believe animal testing is essential to find if certain drugs are harmful to humans.

Animal testing involves testing pharmaceutical drugs on animals in order to see the effectiveness and side effects of the drug. This is usually carried out by inhaling, inserting or placing the drug on the animal’s skin. Two regular tests conducted are the LD50 test and Draize test.
LD50 is a common animal test which stands for the lethal dose (LD) which will kill 50 per cent of the animals being tested in a certain amount of time. It involves the testing substance usually placed in the animal’s mouth via a tube. Animals are observed over a series of days to determine which dose of substance. LD50 is most commonly tested on rats and mice and is used to test drugs, agricultural chemicals, cleaners, and some cosmetics. (
Draize test is an eye or skin irritancy test usually conducted on rabbits to determine if the pharmaceutical is safe by placing a substance on the skin or eyes. The rabbits are seized with restraints and their eyes are held open so they are unable to blink and wash the chemical out. The effects of the pharmaceutical are observed over the following days to see if any irritation or reactions occurs.( Vicki Katrinak,2007 )

Pharmaceuticals should be tested on animals as alternative methods don’t allow for testing of effects across a whole organism.The alternative method such as growing cell cultures can only determine if the drug is toxic or effective on a cell. It can not determine the side effects such as vomiting, rashes, bleeding and strokes which can occur from some drugs (Kristina Cook, 2006) It would be unsafe to distribute a drug if the side effects were not known.
“The whole organism is so complex that a drug that was effective and nontoxic in-vitro may turn out to be ineffective or toxic when given to a human being”
(Sonu Singh, December 2009)

Animal testing should continue as the impact of diseases have been reduced or in some cases cured. An example of this is the disease Polio which causes paralysis and affected many in the 1900s. A polio vaccine was experimented on animals and later used on humans saving many lives. Flu vaccinations, antibiotics, vaccines and many other pharmaceuticals-all used on humans have been through animal testing to deem them safe. (
Dr Conn a scientist at the Oregon University said that “polio, smallpox, and tuberculosis are but...

Find Another Essay On Animal Testing is Necessary, but Should All Testing of Pharmaceuticals be Carried Out on Animals?

Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessary.

1675 words - 7 pages Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessaryIs it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on (People for the Ethical

Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated.

1255 words - 5 pages Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated.In the present era of science and technology, animals are used for experiments in various domains such as cosmetic testing, education, biomedical research and so on. Educational institutes from all over the world use animals in biomedical testing; cosmetic and genetic industries primarily use animals for different types of tests. Sarah Rose A. Miller, who wrote the prize-winning essay for the

This is an essay i wrote on animal testing and why it should be stopped.

633 words - 3 pages misleading, because animals react to certain drugs and chemicals in a different way than humans.There are actually many alternatives available that could be used instead of painful and immoral testing. One form of this is new computer software that has come out which can predict the reaction of body towards different substances. Alternative techniques like the use of computers, human cells and tissues, powerful scanners should be used instead of the

Animal testing should not be conducted

797 words - 4 pages relief. Thus, many laboratory animals suffer with pain until the very last day of their lives, which could be days, months, or years. They are confined in small cages, denied of their natural instincts and abilities. Even with such sacrifices of the animals, the accuracy of animal testing is opened to debate. Some people may argue that the results of animal testing are reliable, but this is actually the exact opposite in most cases. It is

Testing Drugs On Animals

755 words - 3 pages animals used to a minimum in these tests. Refine the way the experiments are carried out to make sure the animals suffer as little as possible if they have to at all. Replace animal experiments with non-animal techniques as often as possible. There are many ways to reduce the number of animals used in experiments. It is needed to keep very good statistics on how many animals are needed. If too few are used, then the results are not reliable and the

Medical Testing on Animals

697 words - 3 pages strikes a person every 45 seconds.The Centers for Disease Control estimate that 70-80% of the commondiseases killing Americans are preventable given a responsible dietand lifestyle. Drug testing on animals is inaccurate and does notbenefit humans or animals at all. Animals including, but not limitedto, dogs, cats, mice, rats, guinea pigs, hamsters, gerbils, rhesusmonkeys, imported primates, owls, deer, sheep, llama, and cattle arecommonly used for

Genetic testing on animals

2111 words - 8 pages indeed a successful study. The United Nations was a skeptic on this issue, but had changed their minds due to the advancement of their experiments. If an organization at this height believes in this research, then they must know all of the facts and must be respected in their decision. But there are more facts that provide reason for continuing with genetically modified crops.America is not the only place that uses and approves of genetically

Animal Testing Is Wrong

1801 words - 7 pages that most would agree that animal abuse is wrong. So, if animal abuse is wrong and animal testing can be, and usually is, much more painful and severe than animal abuse; why can’t people agree on the subject of animal testing? However, the argument for animal testing is also legitimate. Animal testing can help scientists find side effects, medicines, even cures. So, are the advantages of testing on animals worth the ethical issues it creates

The Rights of Testing on Animals

1190 words - 5 pages" 29 Jan. 2014. Web. 4 May. 2014.). Yes, the AWA protects animals, but protecting millions of animals can be very hard for a law to control especially since America is not the only country doing experiments on animals. ”The Animal Welfare Act has not succeeded in preventing horrific cases of animal abuse in research laboratories.”( "Animal Testing" 29 Jan. 2014. Web. 4 May. 2014.). All this

The Controversy of Testing on Animals

1187 words - 5 pages testing for cosmetics, and alternative testing methods are generally available and lead to more reliable results. This is an upsetting topic but everyone should be aware of animals being used when purchasing a product. Some products say – no animal testing involved in its development. Product testing is commonly performed on animals in order to measure the effects of the substances used in the making of cosmetics. In performing these tests

Cosmetic Testing on Animal

710 words - 3 pages Cosmetic Testing on Animals Every year, millions of animals suffer and die in painful tests to determine the safety of cosmetics. Substances such as eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, rats, guinea pigs, dogs, and other animals, despite the fact that the test results don’t help prevent or treat human illness or injury. Cosmetics are not required to be tested on animals and since non-animal alternatives exist, it’s hard to

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Should Be Outlawed Essay

1198 words - 5 pages (Baumans). Today, despite activist’s efforts, animal testing is still commonly used. Nevertheless, animal testing is unethical and should be outlawed. People in favor of animal testing believe that animals are needed for any sort of medical advancement. They believe that without testing on live animals, our medical field would not be able to make improvements. Scientists assume that humans would be hindered enormously if they did not test drugs

Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Essay

987 words - 4 pages .” (Garner, 69) The range of ages in the test subjects runs from old to a fetus. It is this that should make people ask themselves if animal testing is ethical. Animals have rights just like every other being. ( Regan, 1) On the other hand animals shouldn’t be rights because they are not moral creatures said Damon Linker. (Linker, 1) But shouldn’t we be the moral and ethical ones? An interesting point was brought up by Robert Gardner, a

Animal Testing Should Be Banned Essay

538 words - 2 pages vast majority of all people. This proves that there is a loophole in animal testing. Ultimately, if animal testing is this inaccurate, it could lead to many people dying. In short, there are reasons beyond these that prove why testing on animals should be banned. The main reason is that animal testing is cruel, ineffective, and unsafe. Animals are condemned to cruelty, and they cannot do anything to stop it. Do not let animals suffer for our own benefit. Ban animal testing and find safe and ethical alternatives.

Animal Testing Should Be Banned Essay

2073 words - 9 pages only report on animal testing when the results are favorable to the human race. Why? Maybe accepting and showing the public the true results of what these animals suffered through is too sad or depressing to be newsworthy. As any scientist should know, different species react in different ways when exposed to the same disease or substance. The act of experimentation plays God by infecting creatures with diseases that they would never naturally