Animal Testing Is Unethical And Should Be Regulated.

1255 words - 5 pages

Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated.In the present era of science and technology, animals are used for experiments in various domains such as cosmetic testing, education, biomedical research and so on. Educational institutes from all over the world use animals in biomedical testing; cosmetic and genetic industries primarily use animals for different types of tests. Sarah Rose A. Miller, who wrote the prize-winning essay for the Humanist, reports "Millions of animals, mostly frogs, are killed every year expressly for educational use" (Miller 1).In many cases, animals are used in order to make sure that a particular finished product will have no side affects on humans. Animals have been used for several decades in experiments to assure human safety. One of the biggest controversies in all areas of research today centers on the ethics of using animals to test the safety or effectiveness of new products and procedures. However, this issue has raised a number of questions relating to human ethics. In the past, several plans have been introduced for organizations that continuously rely on animals for testing purposes, but no plans have worked so far.Imagine having the nerves removed from your limbs and then stimuli-flames and electrical shocks-applied to your appendages to see if you can feel it. This is an actual test that was preformed on monkeys in Silver Spring, Maryland (Amory 117). Animal testing should not be done in a manner as it is presently being done. Not only is it unethical and cruel, organizations are using animals in their laboratories for profit purposes and are abusing the rights they have to experiment on these animals.Kinnett 2According to Bekoff, "at least 25 million animals (including chimpanzees, dogs, cats, rabbits, hamsters, birds, and rats) are used in U.S. research labs" (Bekoff 1). Imagine howanimals feel when they are tortured and killed as they do not receive pain killers; this is sheer brutality. Animal rights agencies are continuously pressurizing governments and related authorities to pose restrictions on animal testing. Today, this phenomenon has become an issue of public debate for most of the government agencies. A survey conducted in 2003 found that 63 percent of Americans believe that animal testing is moral (Update). On the other hand, there are many people who are not in favor of animal testing for monetary gains purposes. Twenty-five million animal tests in a year is a huge number that undoubtedly needs to be reduced.Pro-test activists believe that the use of animals for product testing is good rather than to experiment on a human being. As a matter of fact, when a manufactured product is being tested on an animal for side affects is not risky in anyway for a human being. Similarly, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) requires that all newly developed drugs, both over-the-counter and prescription, be tested on animals before being approved for human consumption (Update). Delmas Luedke argues...

Find Another Essay On Animal testing is unethical and should be regulated.

This is an essay i wrote on animal testing and why it should be stopped.

633 words - 3 pages misleading, because animals react to certain drugs and chemicals in a different way than humans.There are actually many alternatives available that could be used instead of painful and immoral testing. One form of this is new computer software that has come out which can predict the reaction of body towards different substances. Alternative techniques like the use of computers, human cells and tissues, powerful scanners should be used instead of the

Animal Testing is Necessary, but Should All Testing of Pharmaceuticals be Carried Out on Animals?

931 words - 4 pages Introduction Animals have been used for pharmaceutical testing throughout history. The Greeks in early BC were the first to carry out animal testing using live animals to test experiments and different medicines on. (en.wikipedia.org/wiki/History_of_animal_testing) Animal testing has provided many positives to human lives but is still a controversial issue. Some people believe that animal testing is unnecessary and alternatives should be

Animal testing should not be conducted

797 words - 4 pages safe, with no animals or humans harmed in the process. There are also no reported pharmaceutical side effects that would be detrimental to humans, since actual human cells are in use. Hence, compared to the benefits of the alternative methods, animal testing is absolutely unnecessary and wasteful of precious lives. Animal testing should not be conducted, as they are unethical, unreliable, and unnecessary. Millions of animals every year are

What the Government Should do About Animal Testing

2125 words - 9 pages occurred in these labs is all done with the animal’s health and safety in mind. I however, did sign a secrecy contract and thus am unable to reveal the name of the company or the testing that occurs. Animals in this writing do not include humans but all other species in the kingdom Animalia. The question occurs on what the state’s policy should be on animal testing? Should complete freedom be given or should animals not be tested on? In this

Marijuana Should Be Legalized and Regulated

2068 words - 9 pages them. In a truly free society substances such as marijuana should not be illegal. The prohibition of alcohol had shown that it is impossible to change people’s habits, so instead of fighting it, it is better to profit from it. The prohibition of marijuana was a mistake based on racism and politics, cannabis also has widespread use in America and the country can greatly benefit by legalizing it; therefore, U.S Federal Government needs to legalize

Pornography Should be Regulated

2343 words - 9 pages . Freedom of speech is archetypally recognised as a basic human right in free and democratic societies. When contending whether speech that may be deemed offensive should be safeguarded one may refer to the judgement of Redmond-Bate v. DPP: "Free speech includes not only the inoffensive but the irritating, the contentious, the eccentric, the heretical, the unwelcome and the provocative provided it does not tend to provoke violence

Should Hate Speech be Regulated?

1840 words - 8 pages regulated or if it should be regulated. It is hate speech. What exactly is hate speech? Hate speech is when a person uses words intentionally to hurt someone else; they can use hateful words based on race, religion, gender, or sexual orientation (dictionary.com). Yet the origin of hate-speech laws has been largely forgotten. The divergence between the United States and European countries is of comparatively recent origin. In fact, the United

Human Cloning Should Not Be Regulated

1084 words - 4 pages these breakthroughs in their sights, would be forced to take their experiments underground to avoid political repercussions.           The opposition insists on the regulation of cloning and is suggesting a permanent ban, arguing that cloning in any way is unethical.  Some take the position that scientists can not be trusted, ethically, to know when the experiments should stop, therefore, the scientific community would be unable to effectively

Should Hate Speech be Regulated on Campus?

1229 words - 5 pages Johnathan Rauch would not be in favor of the speech codes proposed at ISU because he argues that racist speech cannot be regulated without political and all other speech also falling victim to censorship. In Rauch's view the question is not which speech or expressive behavior is acceptable or is not acceptable because if any is restricted all speech is in jeopardy. Rauch would use two different schools of thought to explain his views on hate

Animal Testing is Animal Cruelty

1814 words - 7 pages experiment was also done sloppy and wrong. Britches was deprived of everything and he didn’t know the tactics of a blind person like a blind kid would know when he or she is growing up. Britches is a reason why animal testing should be banned because scientists start to get lazy with the experiments and do not care about what the animals’ experience. These scientists are getting to comfortable with these tests for the monkeys. Experimenters do this

Animal Testing Is Wrong

1801 words - 7 pages campaign. These events show that unless we have suitable alternatives to animal testing, it would be disastrous to end the practice altogether. The negatives of animal testing are that it is unethical, inhumane and can be unnecessary. Thousands of animals suffer and die every day in laboratories around the world and more than 100 million animals each year are poisoned, burned, shocked and killed, causing them unimaginable pain, fear and loneliness. Mark

Similar Essays

Should Animal Testing Be Banned? Essay

987 words - 4 pages many more still remain in need. 80,000 chemicals were drawn up on a priority list to test basic safety information. ( Goldberg,1) Another important reason why animal testing should be banned is because it is unethical. “The testing of a single pesticide consumes a minimum of two years and approximately 10,000 animals of several species. In these two years decide whether or not the chemical is absorbed through the skin, inhaled or put in food

Animal Testing Should Be Outlawed Essay

1198 words - 5 pages (Baumans). Today, despite activist’s efforts, animal testing is still commonly used. Nevertheless, animal testing is unethical and should be outlawed. People in favor of animal testing believe that animals are needed for any sort of medical advancement. They believe that without testing on live animals, our medical field would not be able to make improvements. Scientists assume that humans would be hindered enormously if they did not test drugs

Animal Testing Should Be Banned Essay

538 words - 2 pages Did you know that the shampoo you use was probably forced down the throat of a rabbit, cat, or maybe even a dog? Each year, millions of animals are used to test how safe and effective products, such as cosmetics, are. They are genetically modified, force-fed harmful chemicals, blinded, scalded, and maimed. How could one not object to this awful cruelty? Animal testing should be banned because it is cruel, unnecessary, inaccurate, and expensive

Animal Testing Should Be Banned Essay

2073 words - 9 pages only report on animal testing when the results are favorable to the human race. Why? Maybe accepting and showing the public the true results of what these animals suffered through is too sad or depressing to be newsworthy. As any scientist should know, different species react in different ways when exposed to the same disease or substance. The act of experimentation plays God by infecting creatures with diseases that they would never naturally