Animal Testing Necessary Or Barbaric And Wrong? Discursive Essay.

1508 words - 6 pages

Animal testing has for a long time been a much debated moral issue. For many, this kind of testing has been the only kind of hope for developing new medicines and treatments for illness. For others, it is an unacceptable and unnecessary cruel way of exploiting animals for our own purposes. Treatments for illnesses such as tuberculosis, diabetes, kidney failure and asthma have all been discovered, and vaccinations against polio, diphtheria, tetanus and measles for example have all been found.There are strict laws in place for using animals for testing and research purposes, so as to minimise any pain and distress the animals may encounter.The Animals (Scientific Procedures) Act 1986 ensures that the usage of animals must be kept to a minimum and animals may only be used when no other method of testing is available.The law states that the testing must be humane and only if no other method can be used in the particular procedure.By "humane", the law means that painkillers and anaesthetics must be used when necessary, and if an animal is in severe pain it must be painlessly killed immediately to eliminate it's suffering.The majority of animals used in research are mice, rats and other rodents. In fact, they make up around 84% of animals used. Animals more commonly used as pets, for example dogs and cats, make up only around 0.4% of animals used.The reason animals are used is that they have more DNA similarities to a human than you would at first think. Their bodies will react in a similar way to a human body would to drugs. Also, rodents are easily cared for. Their short lifespan means that the long term effects of medicines can be seen more quickly. Animals are specially bred for use in testing. Pets are never, ever used. The animals are kept in clean, airy surroundings, and a vet is usually available 24 hours a day. Usually, once an experiment is complete, the animals involved are killed humanely, so as post-mortem examinations can be carried out.Most scientists would prefer to use non-animal methods, but often these just don't provide sufficient evidence as to what the effects on a living creature would be.The numbers of animals used in testing has greatly decreased in the past 30 years. In 1972, there were around 5.5 million procedures on animals, and in 2002 it was reduced to around 2.73 million procedures. This is because alternative methods have been developed and they have become more reliable.In some countries it is a legal requirement for a drug to be tested on animals before it is sold. Work is being done to change these regulations to minimise animal deaths.The "3 Rs" principle is one which is used to decrease numbers of animals dying.The first R is Replace. This means to replace the use of animals where possible. The second R is Reduce. What this represents is to reduce the numbers of animals per experiment to the absolute minimum. The final R is Refine. This means to change the ways that tests are done to lessen the distress caused to...

Find Another Essay On Animal Testing - Necessary or Barbaric and Wrong? - Discursive Essay.

Animal Testing Is Wrong Essay

1801 words - 7 pages that most would agree that animal abuse is wrong. So, if animal abuse is wrong and animal testing can be, and usually is, much more painful and severe than animal abuse; why can’t people agree on the subject of animal testing? However, the argument for animal testing is also legitimate. Animal testing can help scientists find side effects, medicines, even cures. So, are the advantages of testing on animals worth the ethical issues it creates

A problem/solution essay on Animal Testing, and why it is wrong.

903 words - 4 pages market (AMPEF). Animal testing is plainly unnecessary and downright cruel. Testing anything on animals, and putting them at harm, for this animal testing should be outlawed.If you think that animal testing is an effective way to give humans accurate results on whether a product will harm us or not, well think again. Practolol, a drug for heart disorders which passed animal testing was pulled off the shelves when the drug was found to cause blindness

Needless Animal Research, Testing, and Experimentation is Wrong

964 words - 4 pages , and sometimes death, during lab experiments. No animal experiments can be justified. Animals have helped in some ways, such as the discovery of the polio vaccine. Vivisection can be defined as an invasive experiment performed on an animal for the purpose of scientific research, product testing or education ("The National. . ."). Vivisection is extremely wrong because it causes pain and suffering on animals. Animals are entitled to be free from

Animal Testing is Necessary, but Should All Testing of Pharmaceuticals be Carried Out on Animals?

931 words - 4 pages considered. Others believe animal testing is essential to find if certain drugs are harmful to humans. Biology Animal testing involves testing pharmaceutical drugs on animals in order to see the effectiveness and side effects of the drug. This is usually carried out by inhaling, inserting or placing the drug on the animal’s skin. Two regular tests conducted are the LD50 test and Draize test. LD50 is a common animal test which stands for the

Animal Testing Essay

3362 words - 13 pages colleagues developed a test to determine both dermal (skin) and ocular (eye) irritancy in products. When testing the dermal irritancy of a product on an animal, an area of the animal is shaved or abraded then the product is placed on the animal's skin and is observed for up to three days for signs of allergic reactions. ("Product Testing Toxic and Tragic") During the ocular test 100 milligrams of the concentrated solution of a test product are dripped

Animal Testing: Life or Death

939 words - 4 pages considerations.” Vertebrates, also know as animals with a backbone, have the same nerves that humans have to feel pain. We have a moral obligation to animals to protect their rights as creatures of this earth and members of our modern day society. Animals have a life full of love and contentment, by torturing them we are denying them that right. Some might say that animal testing provides necessary information to cure diseases and make helpful

Testing on Animals: Wrong or Right

1483 words - 6 pages Animal Experimentation and Animal Rights PAGE 6 Animal Experimentation and Animal RightsRichard Wellman Azusa Pacific Online UniversityThe animal rights discussion is a very very difficult one to have for most people, and the topic itself is a very intricate one that has many sub-topics that reside within the main topic itself. However, for the purpose of a clearer and more precise essay I have chosen to focus primarily on animal testing and

Drug Testing on Welfare Recipients: Necessary or Costly?

2309 words - 10 pages if the person is under the influence of drugs, but rather “detects the presence of non-psychoactive drug metabolites that may linger in the system days or weeks after use” (Gieringer 1). This becomes a problem for people trying to quit drug addictions and receive help to turn their lives around because it will pick up traces of drug use long after the user has quit. The use of this type of drug testing discriminates against the former illicit drug

Animal Experimentation is Ethical and Necessary

1168 words - 5 pages Treatment of Animals, or PETA. Even though PETA is totally against animal testing, they still help in controlling animal treatment (Ericson para 2). For example, when PETA, or other well-known animal rights activists discover unethical treatments of animals, they can and will have the place fined and even shut down (Ericson para 2). There are many guidelines to make sure that animals are treated ethically so that their experimentation is not

This is an essay i wrote on animal testing and why it should be stopped.

633 words - 3 pages this oven cleaner. Believe it or not, this testing goes on everyday and is a common form of testing for several products. Other products such as eye shadow and soap are tested on rabbits, guinea pigs, rats, dogs, and many other animals, despite the fact that the test results do not help prevent or treat human illness or injury. Animal testing is morally and humanely wrong because of the lives they take, the form of testing, and they ways testing

The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing

1470 words - 6 pages The argument as to whether or not animal testing should be done has been going on for decades. Medical laboratories and shelters are common places where most animals are tested. Animals are typically used because they are cheap and easily obtainable. Some believe that the usage of animals is morally and ethically wrong because animals are still considered thinking and breathing living things. Others believe that because they are not human, that

Similar Essays

Animal Testing Wrong Or Right? Essay

2080 words - 8 pages Animals should not have to suffer for the sake of testing out new products or medicines. Many of the scientists and government officials agree, animal testing should cause minimal pain and suffering as possible, and that testing on animals should be done only when necessary. Pardue states that, "Replacement of animal tests, reduction in the number of animals used (currently some 20 million annually in the U.S.), and refinement of experimental

Animal Testing: Is It Right Or Wrong?

1609 words - 7 pages Animal Testing- Is it Right or Wrong? Everyday, people all around the world use facial products, receive vaccinations and take antibiotics or medications that have been previously tested on animals. Rarely people think about whether or not animals have been tortured to use the products that they are using, but simply only think of themselves and their own well-being. “An estimated 26 million animals are used each year in the United States for

Animal Testing: Right Or Wrong? Jeremy Bentham

1365 words - 5 pages irritation of the skin and eyes where chemicals are put on shaved skin or dropped into an animal’s eyes without any relief for the pain being caused to them. Also, a generally denounced lethal dose test is carried out on the lab animals where they are forced to ingest large amounts of a product’s chemical for scientists to conclude on what is the exact dose that can cause death for the people who buy the product. Animal testing should be banned

Argument Essay Animal Testing Is Necessary.

1675 words - 7 pages Argument Essay - Animal Testing is necessaryIs it really necessary to take the lives of animals in the name of science and for the betterment of humanity? For animal rights activists, like People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), the answer is no. PETA pressures labs into halting experiments, because they believe that animals are not to be used by humans for food, clothing, entertainment, or to experiment on (People for the Ethical