Animal testing is abusive, ineffective, and should be outlawed. The use of animals in life sciences has been in laboratories for over a century. The American Medical Society endorses allowing testing of all animals to create new medicine or treatments for humans. Ever since animal testing has been put into action, many people have expressed their ethical and scientific unease about the experiments. Not only does the procedure cause the creature physical pain and psychological distress, but also it wastes resources.
The experiments do not reliably predict human outcomes. Humans have mental capabilities that allow them to think and speak more easily. Animals do not have creative language such as humans but can only communicate within themselves. Therefore, humans tend to communicate for them. Animals are not able to discuss their feelings or pain. They are unable to let scientists know what part of the procedure had gone wrong. Instead, they cry out in agonizing pain.
Furthermore, animals and humans do not share the same anatomy. Animals do not get the same diseases as humans. Studying the human islet cells proves that mankind dramatically differs from the animal internal structure. For example, strokes are very common but not within the animal kingdom. In result, scientists attempt to artificially develop a stroke inside an animal and it does not further the studies in comparison to a human stroke.
Dr. Paul Bunn, Director of the International Society for the study of Lung Cancer, said, “Animal models have not been very predictive or how well [cancer] drugs would do in people. We put a human tumor under a mouse’s skin, and that microenvironment doesn’t reflect a person’s- the blood vessels, inflammatory cells or cells of the immune system.” Fran V., Founder of National Breast Cancer Coalition, said, “Animals don’t reflect the reality of cancer in humans. We cure cancer in animals all the time, but not in people.”
In addition, animals have different reactions to substances than one does. Some drugs or compounds are harmful to animals but not to humans. They also vary from animal to animal because they differ from one another in biological significant ways. For example, penicillin worked well for mice but horrible for rabbits. It was a big risk that Dr. Alexander Fleming took to try it on humans. Furthermore, morphine makes cats hyper, but gives calm, relaxing feeling to humans. Researchers believe that because the substance worked well on an animal, it'll work the same with a human but it won't. "The model becomes what we study, not the human disease,"-Susan F.
Animal testing is not a 99.9% guaranteed procedure. According to the Huntington Life Sciences department, animal tests and human results only agree mostly at 25%. Most of the experience effects cannot be recorded. Many drugs that have been approved through animal testing have caused problems that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have had to remove...