This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Anti Americanism In France: Who’s To Blame?

1669 words - 7 pages

To understand the deepest roots of French anti-Americanism one must journey back to the very colonization of North America in the eighteenth century. Both France and Britain wanted territory in the newly discovered North America, and this territorial quest between the European powers soon became a full-scale war. The French and Indian War took place between French colonists, and their Indian allies against Great Britain, the Anglo-American colonists and the Iroquois Confederacy (Indians who controlled most of New York and northern Pennsylvania). It began as Britain established colonies on the eastern coast of North America while France occupied much of middle North America. The poorly established border between the French and British territories led the French to build a series of forts in the Ohio River Valley. This was a French attempt to bolster their claim on the territory. British colonial forces, led by George Washington, were defeated in their attempt to eradicate French forces from the Ohio River Valley. The British Prime Minister immediately called for retaliation; this news, though, was quickly leaked to the public. France was now fully aware of Britain’s plan for vengeance, and this knowledge escalated what should have been a relatively small-scale battle for territory into a full-blown war.
In light of the impending defeat in North America and failed negotiations with Great Britain, France formed an alliance with Spain that would require Spain to declare war on Great Britain if the war did not conclude prior to May 1st, 1762. Ideally this would pressure Britain into a peace agreement. However, the result was just the opposite. The Grand Alliance, which embodied England, the League of Augsburg, Denmark, Portugal, and the Netherlands, declared war on France and Spain to avoid the combination of their thrones following the death of King Charles II of Spain. The impressive naval strength of Britain proved too powerful for Spain and France. Britain seized French and Spanish territories in Europe as well as North America. While a huge success for Great Britain, this intercontinental war would still prove extremely costly for all sides.
Britain’s success over France and Spain was grossly expensive. Great Britain’s government enforced taxes the colonies of North America to help pay the debt. This angered the colonists who were not directly represented in Parliament back in England. “No taxation without representation” they protested. This led to the beginning of the American Revolution.
France, with the bitter taste of defeat in her mouth, saw an opportunity to impose revenge on Great Britain in the American Revolutionary War. In 1776 the American victory over Britain at the Battle of Saratoga gave France confidence in an American defeat over Great Britain. In 1778 France recognized the United States of America and formed a military alliance. Shortly after, Spain joined the U.S. and France and went to war with Britain as well. The war came to...

Find Another Essay On Anti-Americanism in France: Who’s to Blame?

Empathy and Social Change in To Kill a Mockingbird, Milk, and Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner

1846 words - 7 pages Empathy and Social Change in To Kill a Mockingbird, Milk, and Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner Empathy: “The action of understanding, being aware of, being sensitive to, and vicariously experiencing the feelings, thoughts, and experience of another of either the past or present without having the feelings, thoughts, and experiences fully communicated in an objectively explicit manner” (according to

Oedipus Is to Blame in Oedipus Rex

516 words - 2 pages Oedipus Is to Blame         In Sophicle's Oedipus The King, Oedipus plays the lead character in the play.  Oedipus plays blindfolded throughout the play.  His character that he betrays is typical of those who honestly believe they have no part in the situation that occurs.  I agree with Bernard Knox that Oedipus is responsible for the tragic outcome of the play.  Oedipus's investigation of

Listening Goals and Communication in The Film Guess Who’s Coming to Dinner

1309 words - 5 pages Guess who’s coming to Dinner A Review of Literature and Film Clip Listening and responding to others has a major role to play in good communication and as such, satisfy their own purposes in life. People communicate with each other for getting information across, for learning and evaluating purposes, for listening and observation purposes or for mere enjoyment or recreation. However, it is a well known fact, that no two people listen

Feminism, Anti-feminism and Adultery in the Lais of Marie De France

2112 words - 8 pages are eventually defeated by those who obey it. Perhaps it is not the code that Marie is supporting, but the bond between a man and wife. Those who break this bond eventually face ill fate. By creating an unfortunate outcome for all characters who commit adultery, despite their adherence to the code or lack thereof, Marie de France shows her support for strong marital faithfulness rather than revealing her feminist or anti-feminist voice. In

Who is to Blame in Romeo and Juliet?

1605 words - 6 pages Who to Blame for the Deaths of Romeo and Juliet The deaths of Romeo and Juliet didn't really need to happen, as it wasn't them, but the people around them that were fighting and disagreeing. Romeo and Juliet did their best to keep out of the violence but the people around them such as family friends and the local community that were making them unhappy. Romeo is a young teenager of the Montague Household, who falls in

Who is to Blame in Romeo and Juliet?

1164 words - 5 pages themselves dealt with these emotions. Blame is defined in the dictionary as to feel or declare that someone/something is responsible for a fault or wrong. So who out of all of the culprits was really to blame? The Capulets, the Montagues and the feud boiling between them, Prince Escalus, Tybalt, Mercutio, Friar Laurence or even Romeo and Juliet themselves? The feud between the Montague and the Capulet family plays a massive role in the young

Romeo is More to Blame in Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet

956 words - 4 pages Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet is about two star-crossed lovers, Romeo and Juliet, forbidden to be together because of feuding families. Countless people contribute to Romeo and Juliet’s predestined fate and misadventures. This ultimately leads to Romeo and Juliet’s suicide. Who is more to blame for Romeo and Juliet’s death? Although Juliet acts rashly, Romeo is more to blame. Furthermore, Romeo starts the whole tragedy. True, Juliet acts

Who is to Blame in Romeo and Juliet?

1068 words - 5 pages made one immature action after another that ultimately lead to Romeo and Juliet's deaths. In addition, Lord Capulet is to blame for his selfishness. To start, he doesn't remember why he is fighting with the Montague's. The first thing the audience is told is, "From ancient grudge break to new mutiny," (Prologue Line 3). However, since Lord Capulet is so selfish and egotistic, he will not admit his faults and continues the fighting between the

Oedipus is to Blame in Oedipus the King

718 words - 3 pages Oedipus is to Blame in Oedipus the King      In the story of Oedipus the King, Sophocles portrays the main character, Oedipus, as a good natured person that has bad judgment and frailty.  Oedipus makes a few bad decisions and is condemned to profound suffering because of his pride.  I agree with Aristotle that he brings it all on to himself because of his own personal pride.         One day Oedipus finds out

The Stars Are Not to Blame: Shakespeare in Love

1145 words - 5 pages actions. In conclusion, the idea that a character can only blame himself for his misery or death is portrayed by Viola in Shakespeare in Love for her attempts to pursue dreams she could never fulfill, Romeo in Romeo and Juliet for his impulsive behaviour, and Brutus in Julius Caesar for his naivety. Cassius once tells Brutus, “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, / But in ourselves” (Julius Caesar, 1, 2, 139–140), explaining how people

Missionaries Are to Blame in Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart

851 words - 3 pages Missionaries Are to Blame in Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart      The burden and calling to reach out and help others, enfold many people in society throughout the world. Rich or poor, young or old, black, red or white, the motive is helping those with a need. As Chinua Achebe points out in his book, Things Fall Apart, though there is the aspiration to lend a hand, it can sometimes become deadly, and even fatal to the lives of people

Similar Essays

Anti Americanism In France: Who’s To Blame?

1242 words - 5 pages annex Leclerc’s battalion into his army. Since anti-Americanism was prominent in France at this time, and even though they were thankful for the help, Leclerc could not see past the fact that America was late to the war. This reasoning made it very hard for Patton and Leclerc to see eye-to-eye. Finally, Patton gave in and let Leclerc liberate Paris from the East while he came in with his army from the west. Charles De Gaulle then came in to be

Anti Americanism In China Essay

2134 words - 9 pages Anti-Americanism is defined in terms of “psychological tendency to hold negative views of the United States and of American society in general”(Katzenstein and Keohane, p.12). History expanded the love-hate relationship between China and the United States from political, economical, social perspectives. Distinguishing predisposition and opinion is vital as well as understanding the multidimensional views from a heterogeneous group of people

To What Extent Was Louis Xvi To Blame For The Problems In France?

779 words - 3 pages , where everyone had to experience the unfairness of France's money distribution, and later on really suffer because of it. France was already in financial problems anyway because of the War of American Independence that they supported, so now they were not only in bankruptcy but many people were not even able to pay taxes.There is no way Louis XVI is to blame fully for all the problems there were in France, mainly because some of those problems

Anti Semitism In 19th Century France Essay

603 words - 2 pages Jewish practices, which the French population viewed as superstitious and inferior. The study of rationalism and reason in the Enlightenment ultimately led to the widespread persecution of Jews.The Dreyfus Affair, a scandal that occurred for twelve years between 1894 and 1906, is a perfect example of the senseless anti-Semitism rampant throughout France during the 19th century. Alfred Dreyfus was a Jewish artillery officer in the French Army. He was