This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Ap United States History, Indian Removal Act, Was It Justifiable To Get So Many Indians Killed? Us History Research Paper

691 words - 3 pages

Tevin Flores
WAS THE INDIAN REMOVAL JUSTIFIABLE?
From the time of Thomas Jefferson’s term as the president of the United States, congress was trying to encourage Indians to adapt to the ways of the white people living in the United States. President Andrew Jackson wanted the white settlers from the south to expand owning land from Five Indian tribes, which was called Indian Removal Policy. The Five Indian tribes that were affected were Choctaws, Muskogee, Chickasaws, Cherokees, and the Seminoles. In the 1830, the Removal Act went into effect. The Removal Act gave President Andrew Jackson the power to remove Indian tribes living east of the Mississippi river by a negotiate removal treaties. The treaties, made the Indians give up their land for exchange of land in the west. There were a few tribes that agreed to sign the treaties. The others that did not sign the treaty were forced into leaving their land, this was known as the Trail of Tears. Trail of Tears was the description of the journey Indians had to endure. The Indians were forced to leave their homes and families and move to the west, which is now known as Oklahoma. This Indian removal was unjustifiable, President Jackson overused his power. the main reason why Indians were relocated from their land was hatred and racism, white society saw Indians as an inferior race not capable of being as civilized as the them.
President Jackson was the leader of the new Democratic party at that time, however, he did not follow any of President Jefferson’s principles, President Jefferson himself considered President Jackson as a dangerous person: “I am much alarmed at the prospect of seeing General Jackson become President. He is one of the most unfit men I know of for such a place. He has very little respect for laws or Constitutions.” President Jackson removed Indians from their homelands in the west and forced them to walk a Trail of Tears east to assigned lands; military force was necessary to relocate them. President Jackson stated that Indians would have better opportunities if they move, however, after they were relocated, the result was quite the opposite, reservations had horrible living conditions, the percentage of American Indians living below poverty on the reservations were 38% to 63%, compared to the Americans, with only 15%...

Find Another Essay On AP UNITED STATES HISTORY, INDIAN REMOVAL ACT, WAS IT JUSTIFIABLE TO GET SO MANY INDIANS KILLED? - US HISTORY - RESEARCH PAPER

The Indian Removal Act Essay

859 words - 4 pages opportunity to move to a new land and be happy the government would help them do so. Clearly, Jackson was successful in the forced removal of the Indians through these “treaties.” In the end, the only beneficiaries of the removal were the white settlers who were able to push deeper into the South and establish their cotton plantations. The Problems with the Indian Removal Act While the Creek, Cherokee, Choctaw, Chickasaw, and Seminole Nations

AP United States History Chapter 7 - AP United States History - Notes

1383 words - 6 pages did Britain need money? From the French and Indian War · Who was George Grenville and what did he do to arouse the resentment of the colonists prior to the Stamp Act? The prime minister was first aroused by the resentment of colonists by having the British navy to begin to strictly enforce the navigation laws · ID the Stamp Act. The first ever law ever passed by that body for raising tax revenue in the colonies for the crown · Why did Grenville not

The Indian removal act

3619 words - 14 pages peaceful assimilation could successfully be achieved among the Indians living east of the Mississippi. If the United States stuck to a more broadminded scheme or idea, the relationship toward the Native Americans and eventually other Indians that they would encounter further west, may not have been as tragic as they were.The history of the Indian Removal Act begins during Jackson's first State of the Union Address which was delivered in December of

The Indian Removal Act

678 words - 3 pages is referred to as “The Trail of Tears.” Any benefits the Indian Removal Act was believed to provide Indians were only words stated by Jackson and his followers to gain enough support for the Act to pass Congress. Conclusion The Indian Removal Act was a result and representation of the greed of the Americans. Many early Americans believed the white man was superior to all other races of man and as a result inflicted unimaginable injustices

The Indian Removal Act

762 words - 3 pages land and made to move west of the Mississippi River as other tribes had been. (Foner, 2012) Conclusion By 1840, the entire eastern coast of the United States were inhabited by whites. The Indian Removal Act had served its purpose. The white people moved further south and were more widespread than ever. They viewed the American Indians as American history, not as people that had been forced from their land by the American Government by going

History of The Afghan Blanket - AP United States History - Assignment

816 words - 4 pages you get chilly. BUT you know us crocheters? if we can imagine it? we can hook it! So it?s not uncommon for us to make massive bedspreads and whatever our hearts desire. The term Throw is referring to the size of the afghan. If the afghan is smaller that is more meant for decor or just quick use while sitting in a chair and doesn?t fit a bed size. Basically, you are just ?throwing? it on the couch as a decor item that you may use once a while

Mississippi History: Indian Removal Act, 13th Amendment, and Reverend George Lee

718 words - 3 pages Mississippi History has become the state its now because of many events, government actions, cultural changes, and writers. Indian Act Removal Act, 13th Amendment, and Reverend George Lee played a big impact Mississippi current status. The Removals of Indians increased the Europeans power and lessened the Indian population. The 13th Amendment abolished slavery. Reverend George Lee was shot down for urging blacks to vote. All these contributed to

AP US History - Factors of the Immigration Act of 1924

1263 words - 5 pages nationality who had been living in the United States in 1910. However, this national-origins system was relatively favorable to the immigrants from southern and eastern Europe, for by 1910 immense numbers of them had already arrived. According to the United States Bureau of the Census, southern and eastern European immigration reached 1,250,000 in 1905 and a considerable 700,000 in 1910.Thus, the Emergency Quota Act of 1921 was replaced by the

Andrew Jackson and The Indian Removal Act

1591 words - 6 pages but could not own it, “This was because their “right of occupancy” was subordinate to the United States’ ‘right of discovery’” (Indian Removal Act). The Indians wanted to avoid any more harassment and persecution from the whites so they had to embrace the “American” lifestyle; changing their religion, large-scale farming, and much more. This is a direct violation of the constitution because Indians should have the right and the freedom to choose

Native American Perspective on Indian Removal Act

958 words - 4 pages In May 1830, Congress passed the Indian Removal Act which forced Native American tribes to move west. Some Indians left swiftly, while others were forced to to leave by the United States Army. Some were even taken away in chains. Andrew Jackson, the seventh president of the United States, strongly reinforced this act. In the Second State of the Union Address, Jackson advocated his Indian Policy. There was controversy as to whether the removal of

The Indian Removal Act and Louisiana Purchase

702 words - 3 pages The Indian Removal Act and the Louisiana Purchase was a very important time in the U.S. History and many years to come. In the late 1700s and early 1800s, two major events took place that were turning points for the U.S., The Louisiana Purchase and the Indian Removal Act, these events made an impact socially, economically, and politically. First of all, The United States was out in search for rich soil to plant many fields of cotton

Similar Essays

History: The Indian Removal Act Essay

1260 words - 5 pages ” (Ellis 6). The white Americans were hungry for land and gold. They also did not like the Native Americans. They thought that they were ruthless. Because of this, they wanted the Indians to move away. Using the Indian Removal Act, President Jackson finally was able to get rid of the Native tribes. The Indian Removal was an important part of our nation’s history.   Works Cited Agnew, Brad. Fort Gibson: Terminal on the Trail of Tears. Norman

Study Notes For Indian Removal For United States History Class

689 words - 3 pages )First president to take political advantage of increasing electoral power of westerners and their desire to eliminate Indians: Indian Treaties and Removal Act of 1830(i)Offered voluntary and fair exchange of lands so Indians would not be bothered anymore(ii)Supreme Court found removal act unconstitutional(d)Invented allotment (won’t “work” until 1880s) (Zinn 128)(2)US claims “Plenary Power” over tribes(a)Cherokee Nation v

1985 Dbq Ap United States History Essay

959 words - 4 pages create a tax or change a law required a unanimous vote. Rhode Island listed a few reasons why they did not support the new tax. Some states refused to pay taxes. States argued about land and how some states received more land than the others. These issues led to Shay's Rebellion; where many farmers lost land due to foreclosure and tax delinquency. Hundreds rebelled demanding cheap paper money. This period in time showed the government was too

Ap United States History Free Response

777 words - 3 pages as constructionists.The Embargo Act of 1807 (Doc. C) was passed by Thomas Jefferson and although it was not strictly enforced and was widely evaded it still managed to cause a sort of depression throughout the nation. The thing is, Jefferson seemed to pride himself on his "strict constructionist" values - he played everything by the Constitution. However, did the Constitution give him the right to stop ships from going to foreign ports? It did