This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Appeasement Essay

1026 words - 4 pages

In a political context, appeasement is the idea of pleasing an enemy in order to avoid conflict, such as war. This is what Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, decided to do with Hitler in 1938 to avoid another European war. Some argue that appeasement was not a good idea because it gave Hitler what he wanted, but in other ways it was a very strategic move. Appeasement delayed war and showed that European countries could be responsible about political issues before jumping to conclusions. It also gave the countries more time to build up their armies to be prepared for any type of conflict. It was a fair thing to do because Germany had lost so much due to the Treaty of Versailles and deserved to recover. Appeasement was not a mistake because in the end everything turned out for the better.
Appeasing Hitler was primarily done for one goal; to avoid war and the many terrible things that came along with it. When World War I finally ended in 1918, millions of lives and dollars were lost. As a result, discussing problems seemed to be in everyone’s best interest. No one should ever be blamed for not wanting war because it’s very serious and not something that should be dealt with lightly. With saying that, appeasement was simply a negotiation, a way to solve problems without fighting, and nobody had a way of knowing what Hitler planned to do in the future. As Mackenzie King stated “Hitler appeared to be ‘a man of deep sincerity and a genuine patriot” (King, 1937) meaning that he seemed like the type of person who could obey rules and negotiate his problems, without causing conflict. Neville Chamberlain, the Prime Minister of Great Britain once said, “How horrible, fantastic, incredible it is, that we should be digging trenches and trying on gas-masks here, because of a quarrel in a faraway country between people of whom we know nothing…” (Chamberlain, 1938). This quote truly proves that war is not something to jump into, because “war is a fearful thing, and we must be very clear before we embark on it, that it is really the great issues that are at stake” (Chamberlain, 1938). Appeasement was worth giving a try because it was a chance at having peace between countries and it showed that we were able to be responsible about political issues.
If it hadn’t been for the idea of appeasement, countries like Britain and France would not have had time to build up their armies and defend themselves against Germany. In 1938, France and Britain combined had a total of 2,248 aircraft and 65 divisions. By 1939, they had a total of 2,984 aircraft and 90 divisions ("Our World This Century" 69). This proves that both countries increased their chances at winning a war by gaining warfare. If these countries hadn’t appeased Hitler, they would not have had this time to increase their armies the way they did. Thus, possibly changing the outcome of World War II. For all we know, we could have lost the war because of this vital component. Winston Churchill...

Find Another Essay On Appeasement

The Appeasement for AP European History

797 words - 3 pages There are two opinions that histories have, when thinking about the appeasement. Some historians say that the appeasement wasn't justified and that Chamberlain was a weak person while of the other hand some say that Chamberlain didn't have any other choice. There are a number of reasons that support both of the sides.The Appeasement was justified in a few ways, sympathy for Germany, the desire for peace, the threat of communism and the time to

Appeasement Policy and the Munich Agreement

5814 words - 23 pages of all parties, end goals of each person and the history from the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not. The Munich Pact is a perfect example of how negotiation can fail when all of the pieces do not fall correctly into place. When first beginning the negotiation process it is important to look at all of the parties involved and

To What Extent did Appeasement Cause World War 2?

971 words - 4 pages Appeasement was agreeing mostly to Hitler's opinions. There were many reasons why Britain appeased Hitler in the 1930s. For example, by giving Czechoslovakia to Germany.Hitler sought through the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which took away most of Germany's territories and inflicted disarmament and reparations. In September (1938), Chamberlain met with Hitler in Munich to settle disagreement over Sudetenland. Hitler's demand that

Why did Chamberlain's policies for appeasement change from 1938-1939?

873 words - 3 pages Britain and France chose the path of appeasement in hopes that this would satisfy Hitler and not drag Europe into another world war. Appeasement came from the desire to make amends and prevent war at all costs. Appeasement seemed to be working for small problems but when applied to choices like the fate of a country, appeasement caused more problems than it solved. Events in Europe and Britain between 1989-1939 pressured Chamberlain into

To what extent you think Appeasement (1938) started ww2:

542 words - 2 pages . During the riots, Czech police shot a group of Germansupporters, and gave Hitler an excuse he was looking for and threaten invasion, like Mussolini did in theCorfu incident. Europe lastly hoped and believed Chamberlain promise "peace in our time".By 1939 March the 15th Hitler Spat on the Munich deal and occupied the rest of the Czech State.Appeasement had failed.Chamberlain recognized that his policy of appeasement was a failure, and worked to have

Do you think appeasement is good or not? Tell the reason

681 words - 3 pages Appeasement which was done by chamberlain was to satisfy Germany for preventing war. Actually, at that time, Germany was demanding many things which it lost through Treaty of Versaille. Chamberlain who was British prime minister thought Germany was too punished and had rights to return their prohibited things, and he also thought if he did appeasement, it will make Hitler who was the leader of Germany satisfy and war won't happen. So appeasement

Appeasement and how it changed by the start of the Second World War

986 words - 4 pages From 1938, Appeasement to Hitler seemed to be quite successful in the beginning and soon Chamberlain has changed it. It started because the result of WWI, which made Britain not wanting another war. In the beginning, Chamberlain thought the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh to Germany. Then as Germany got stronger, their reason has changed, the new reasons for appeasing Hitler was, firstly, it gave UK time to prepare for a war as its main

How Far Do You Agree That the Policy of Appeasement Was the Main Cause of WWII?

1949 words - 8 pages expansion mindset, it did not. The German invasion of Poland started on the 1st September 1939. Failure of Appeasement Appeasement means to give in to a demand because it is seen as reasonable. During the 1939’s many British and French politicians agreed that the Treaty of Versailles has placed unreasonable restrictions on Germany. Hitler’s actions were seen as justifiable. In 1934 Germany begun public re-arming and many other countries felt that

British Policy of Appeasement at the Beginning of World War Two

1367 words - 5 pages British Policy of Appeasement at the Beginning of World War Two The First World War was the beginning of a new era in fighting. Weapons and fighting technique had drastically changed, making war much more dangerous. With the predictions for the new weapons including poisonous gas and bigger bombs, Great Britain was very much afraid for its citizens, especially men and women of fighting age. The country wished to avoid war at any cost. The

How did the Spanish Civil War contribute to appeasement by Britain?

2036 words - 8 pages How did the Spanish Civil War contribute to the policy of appeasement by Britain?Until 1931 Spain, the poorest country in Europe at the time, was a monarchy however, as a result of deep divisions within society exacerbated by the military rule of Primo de Rivera imposed in 1923, the incompetent King Alfonso XIII abdicated. Following municipal elections a liberal government took power but the ensuing republic was immediately at risk from the

What were the real factors that led to the discreditation of Appeasement as a policy for foreign diplomacy?

927 words - 4 pages Appeasement was one of the most important causes of WWII. Today people say that it was Chamberlain's appeasement that started the war. It is true to some extent because Chamberlain couldn't prevent the war. However, Chamberlain had actually began thinking to change his policy after the Munich agreement; he was forced to change his appeasement policy because many events happened in 1938-1939. Let's see how the events affected Chamberlain's

Similar Essays

Appeasement Essay

603 words - 2 pages Hussain SafdarMr.MarinovicCHC2D1April 15, 2013Was Appeasement a Mistake?Appeasement, the policy that lead to WWII while misleading countries into thinking that they are safe from war. Appeasement consists of giving into demands, without the risk of war. The policy of Appeasement did not prevent war, it only made things worse by letting dictators like Hitler gain more power, while allowing him to break promises and build his army. If France and

Appeasement Essay

2372 words - 9 pages " Appeasement created the opportunity for Hitler to start World War II." To what extent do you agree with the statement? Explain you answer.The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely

Appeasement Essay

2372 words - 9 pages " Appeasement created the opportunity for Hitler to start World War II." To what extent do you agree with the statement? Explain you answer.The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely

Chamberlain’s Policy Of Appeasement Essay

932 words - 4 pages The Policy of appeasement which Neville Chamberlain, prime minister of Britain from 1937-1939, stood by has been criticized by Churchill, prime minister of Britain 1040-1945, as we well as other historians. Appeasement refers to the act of complying to the demands of another in order to prevent war. Historians argue whether this policy was effective. There are two sides to the argument, while some historians argue that if Chamberlain had