Appeasement Essay

2372 words - 9 pages

" Appeasement created the opportunity for Hitler to start World War II." To what extent do you agree with the statement? Explain you answer.The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely for the outbreak of the First World War, received harsh reparations and was forced to sign the unfair Treaty of Versailles, which made Germany lose territory, as well as limited her armaments. This sparked resentment in the Germans who felt injustice that the war was entirely blamed on them which was prominently evident in Adolf Hitler who rose to power as Fuhrer of Germany in 1933. The highly nationalistic Nazi leader came into power a goal: to make secure and to preserve the racial community and to enlarge it. He hated the Versailles settlement and wanted to destroy it, hence fore building up the army and recovering lost territories to preserve German race. Therefore the in contrast to the Allies, Germany under Adolf Hitler was aggressive and influenced by revisionism. In attempt to preserve peace and not start a war with Germany, Britain and France, the two great powers gave in to Germany instead of standing against the aggressive Hitler. Appeasement is a term often applied to the overly acquiescent foreign policy practiced by Neville Chamberlain when dealing with Hitler's Nazi regime. However, instead of preserving peace that Britain and France desperately wanted, it ironically allowed Hitler who did not have concrete plans on how to achieve his goals, to exploit their weakness and used situations in his advantage, which then resulted in the Second World War. While some may agree to this stand, others argue that Hitler intended a major war right from the beginning as seen from his book Mein Kampf and later on plans verbalized at the Hossbach conference. His aggression threatened to destroy the balance of power, which made the Second World War inevitable, whereby appeasement cannot be blamed as the creation of opportunity to start a war except that it made things easier for Hitler. However, the sources which supports the latter are not fully reliable and consistent, showing evidences that Hitler had no cut and dry views on how he was going to proceed but instead merely reacted to situations that occur. Therefore, I agree to the statement that appeasement created the opportunity for Hitler to start World War II.Indeed, appeasement created the opportunity for Hitler to start World War II; the opportunistic Hitler received encouragement from the passive Britain and France. Chamberlain's overly acquiescent foreign policies towards Germany emboldened Hitler to become more aggressive and make increasingly unacceptable demands, which would result in a dominant Germany. He did not intend to cause a major war but...

Find Another Essay On Appeasement

The Appeasement for AP European History

797 words - 3 pages There are two opinions that histories have, when thinking about the appeasement. Some historians say that the appeasement wasn't justified and that Chamberlain was a weak person while of the other hand some say that Chamberlain didn't have any other choice. There are a number of reasons that support both of the sides.The Appeasement was justified in a few ways, sympathy for Germany, the desire for peace, the threat of communism and the time to

Appeasement Policy and the Munich Agreement

5814 words - 23 pages of all parties, end goals of each person and the history from the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not. The Munich Pact is a perfect example of how negotiation can fail when all of the pieces do not fall correctly into place. When first beginning the negotiation process it is important to look at all of the parties involved and

To What Extent did Appeasement Cause World War 2?

971 words - 4 pages Appeasement was agreeing mostly to Hitler's opinions. There were many reasons why Britain appeased Hitler in the 1930s. For example, by giving Czechoslovakia to Germany.Hitler sought through the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, which took away most of Germany's territories and inflicted disarmament and reparations. In September (1938), Chamberlain met with Hitler in Munich to settle disagreement over Sudetenland. Hitler's demand that

Why did Chamberlain's policies for appeasement change from 1938-1939?

873 words - 3 pages Britain and France chose the path of appeasement in hopes that this would satisfy Hitler and not drag Europe into another world war. Appeasement came from the desire to make amends and prevent war at all costs. Appeasement seemed to be working for small problems but when applied to choices like the fate of a country, appeasement caused more problems than it solved. Events in Europe and Britain between 1989-1939 pressured Chamberlain into

To what extent you think Appeasement (1938) started ww2:

542 words - 2 pages . During the riots, Czech police shot a group of Germansupporters, and gave Hitler an excuse he was looking for and threaten invasion, like Mussolini did in theCorfu incident. Europe lastly hoped and believed Chamberlain promise "peace in our time".By 1939 March the 15th Hitler Spat on the Munich deal and occupied the rest of the Czech State.Appeasement had failed.Chamberlain recognized that his policy of appeasement was a failure, and worked to have

Do you think appeasement is good or not? Tell the reason

681 words - 3 pages Appeasement which was done by chamberlain was to satisfy Germany for preventing war. Actually, at that time, Germany was demanding many things which it lost through Treaty of Versaille. Chamberlain who was British prime minister thought Germany was too punished and had rights to return their prohibited things, and he also thought if he did appeasement, it will make Hitler who was the leader of Germany satisfy and war won't happen. So appeasement

To What extent was the policy of appeasement justified? - History - Essay

1170 words - 5 pages To What extent was the policy of appeasement justified? ‘An appeaser is one who feeds the crocodile hoping it will eat him last.’ – Winston Churchill. Appeasement is the policy of making concessions to dictoral powers in order to avoid conflict, governed by the Anglo-French foreign policy during the 1930’s. It became indelibly associated with Conservative Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain. It is argued appeasement was the reason The Allies

Appeasement and how it changed by the start of the Second World War

986 words - 4 pages From 1938, Appeasement to Hitler seemed to be quite successful in the beginning and soon Chamberlain has changed it. It started because the result of WWI, which made Britain not wanting another war. In the beginning, Chamberlain thought the Treaty of Versailles was too harsh to Germany. Then as Germany got stronger, their reason has changed, the new reasons for appeasing Hitler was, firstly, it gave UK time to prepare for a war as its main

How Far Do You Agree That the Policy of Appeasement Was the Main Cause of WWII?

1949 words - 8 pages expansion mindset, it did not. The German invasion of Poland started on the 1st September 1939. Failure of Appeasement Appeasement means to give in to a demand because it is seen as reasonable. During the 1939’s many British and French politicians agreed that the Treaty of Versailles has placed unreasonable restrictions on Germany. Hitler’s actions were seen as justifiable. In 1934 Germany begun public re-arming and many other countries felt that

British Policy of Appeasement at the Beginning of World War Two

1367 words - 5 pages British Policy of Appeasement at the Beginning of World War Two The First World War was the beginning of a new era in fighting. Weapons and fighting technique had drastically changed, making war much more dangerous. With the predictions for the new weapons including poisonous gas and bigger bombs, Great Britain was very much afraid for its citizens, especially men and women of fighting age. The country wished to avoid war at any cost. The

How did the Spanish Civil War contribute to appeasement by Britain?

2036 words - 8 pages How did the Spanish Civil War contribute to the policy of appeasement by Britain?Until 1931 Spain, the poorest country in Europe at the time, was a monarchy however, as a result of deep divisions within society exacerbated by the military rule of Primo de Rivera imposed in 1923, the incompetent King Alfonso XIII abdicated. Following municipal elections a liberal government took power but the ensuing republic was immediately at risk from the

Similar Essays

Appeasement Essay

603 words - 2 pages Hussain SafdarMr.MarinovicCHC2D1April 15, 2013Was Appeasement a Mistake?Appeasement, the policy that lead to WWII while misleading countries into thinking that they are safe from war. Appeasement consists of giving into demands, without the risk of war. The policy of Appeasement did not prevent war, it only made things worse by letting dictators like Hitler gain more power, while allowing him to break promises and build his army. If France and

Appeasement Essay

1026 words - 4 pages In a political context, appeasement is the idea of pleasing an enemy in order to avoid conflict, such as war. This is what Neville Chamberlain, the British Prime Minister, decided to do with Hitler in 1938 to avoid another European war. Some argue that appeasement was not a good idea because it gave Hitler what he wanted, but in other ways it was a very strategic move. Appeasement delayed war and showed that European countries could be

Appeasement Essay

2372 words - 9 pages " Appeasement created the opportunity for Hitler to start World War II." To what extent do you agree with the statement? Explain you answer.The First World War ended in an Allied victory, but the economies of Britain and France were shattered. In order to rebuild their economies, they had to disarm rapidly. The First World War had also given rise to strong anti-war sentiments, especially in Britain and France. Germany, who was blamed entirely

Chamberlain’s Policy Of Appeasement Essay

932 words - 4 pages The Policy of appeasement which Neville Chamberlain, prime minister of Britain from 1937-1939, stood by has been criticized by Churchill, prime minister of Britain 1040-1945, as we well as other historians. Appeasement refers to the act of complying to the demands of another in order to prevent war. Historians argue whether this policy was effective. There are two sides to the argument, while some historians argue that if Chamberlain had