Are Humans Intrinsically Evil? Essay

1483 words - 6 pages

Evil is complete wickedness and immorality. When asking if humans are intrinsically evil, we are asking if they are hurtful by nature, and if they are born with desires only to be destructive and to cause pain. If humans are intrinsically evil, then they do good things only for personal gain, and they do evil things as a response to their nature. If humans are intrinsically good, they are born with desires to help others and better society. If they are good, then they do good things as a response to their nature, and do evil things because they are corrupted by society, either because of dysfunctional social upbringing, upsetting circumstances, or because they truly believe that what they are doing is the right thing. It is important to ask if humans are intrinsically evil in order to understand how to best govern our society. In understanding our nature, we can understand the necessity of various forms of punishment and instilling compliance with society's rules. If people are evil, then corporal punishment is necessary, because they are less likely to learn from their mistakes, or regret what they have done. If people are good, then corporal punishment is less necessary, because with therapy, they can understand what they have done wrong, and learn from their mistakes. Because are naturally sympathetic and because most crimes have been committed because of some form of corruption, I argue that humans are intrinsically good. We cannot blame evil for the evil actions humans commit. People do evil things because they mistake these actions as a means to good and happiness.Humans are intrinsically good because we naturally feel sympathetic toward others who suffer. Everyone is born with a conscience; a moral sense of what is right and wrong, and as a result, people want to do what is right. Joseph Butler, who focuses on human nature's positive elements, supports this theory. He explained that on a hierarchy of human nature's various attributes, conscience is on the top, and that conscience is the key to moral choices, which is integral to human nature. This is proven by the events after the September 11th attacks. Natalie Angier suggested that we notice the acts of generosity that occurred after the attacks, instead of the horrendous acts committed by the terrorists. In doing so, we notice the generosity of great numbers of people, who immediately donated money for the recovery of New York, for the injured victims and for the families of the deceased. They volunteered to help treat the wounded and clean up at Ground Zero. The amounts of compassion displayed are proof of the good in human nature, because humans want to help those in need.People who offer their time volunteering for charities also prove the theory that humans possess consciences. It is often heard from victims of violence who volunteer: "Maybe I can prevent this from happening to someone else". Humans, therefore, want to end suffering.Although there is much evidence of people...

Find Another Essay On Are Humans Intrinsically Evil?

Nature vs. Nurture (Genesis and Mary Shelleys Frankenstein)

1835 words - 7 pages Elysia KeithSeptember 21, 2014Encounters: Professor MorefieldNature Vs. NurtureMary Shelley's Frankenstein and Robert Alter's translation of Genesis both support the idea that there are vast variations of evil in the world. However, God, in the book of Genesis makes it clear that human beings are intrinsically evil, while Mary Shelley refutes God's claim. In this paper I argue that Mary Shelley denies Gods' assertion that everyone is born evil

The History of the Death Penalty

2318 words - 9 pages those values; therefor it is evil. There are two objections that can be proposed in opposition as to why this argument is not sound. One is that death can't be intrinsically bad if it is, at that moment, choice-worthy or rational; an example of this would be any form of legal euthanasia that is allowed today. To this it can be said that it would be totally OK for one to take their life because the act would do more good than bad in the

Jaggar's Error Theory

1886 words - 8 pages flourishing). According to socialist feminists, purposeful work is instrumentally valuable and intrinsically valuable. Our needs are defined as humans meeting their biological needs (Lecture, 11/12). A common argument against socialist feminists’ view on human nature is from Thomas Malthus. In a nutshell, Malthus argues that humans are inherently lazy, that it is not in our nature to work, and that we would rather avoid it. He is also implying that


1588 words - 6 pages are the three possibilities for the structure of reasons dealt with in foundationalism. But within these basic properties, there is room for success as well as fallibility when dealing with basic belief formation and the credibility of an intrinsically credible belief, and both will be addressed throughout this paper. But first, the main points of foundationalism must be addressed in further depth. The raw elements of foundationalism are

Darwin and Environmental Ethics.

3221 words - 13 pages though humans and animals would endure pain for the purpose of an eventual pleasure (for example, studying hard for a test to receive a good grade), pain is still bad, and therefore, intrinsically bad. However, pleasure and pain are not ends in themselves, but rather, a means to survival. For example, if humans did not feel the pain of starvation or the pleasure of eating nutritious food, they wouldn't be inclined to eat a proper diet and therefore


781 words - 3 pages favor the education of an authentic freedom. In contrast, "every action which, whether in anticipation of the conjugal act, or in its accomplishment, or in the development of its natural consequences, proposes, whether as an end or as a means, to render procreation impossible" is intrinsically evil.'This quote from the Catechism of the Catholic Church literally tells us that all forms of contraception are evil because of their very nature

The Problem of Natural Evil, by Luke Gelinas

1264 words - 5 pages . Natural evil exists as a result of natural processes; for example, there exists diseases like cancers, natural disasters like earthquakes, tornadoes, and hurricanes, and poisonous plants and animals. Humans are capable of bringing about some of these natural evils, but there exist some natural evils that humans are not physically capable of bringing about. Using the same structure Gelinas uses, I will explain how

The Strengths and Weaknesses of Augustine’s and Ireneau's Theodicy

2386 words - 10 pages free will or genuine freedom willingly humans cannot therefore say that God should have never let evil happen on earth. It was their, the humans, choice on whether to take evil and suffering or good and if they chose evil and suffering and say God should have never let it happen they are in fact saying that God should take away their humanity. ‘If anyone do shun the knowledge of both kinds of things…he unaware divests

St. Agustine on the exitance of evil in a world created by a perfect and loving God.

2460 words - 10 pages human ideas. Hence, God may exist but not in the form which Augustine requires him to exist for the basis of his argument.Augustine is trying to show that all things in the world are good. Human free will is the aspect of creation which is most difficult to reconcile to Augustine's vision of the world. Free will is what allows humans to commit sin. If free will is evil or has evil manifest as one of its functions, then evil must have been created

What Makes One Human and What Makes One Animal?

1650 words - 7 pages vehicle through which this can be achieved. Furthermore, although horses are animals, they are also intrinsically human—a variation of humans. Gulliver also accounts for similar stories in his venturingventures to the lands of the Lilliputians and Brobdingnagians. As alluded to , travelers are often met with condescending attitudes when encountered by a particular society. The traveler becomes domesticated and is treated like an animal. Such

Mary Shelley's "Frankenstein" .

965 words - 4 pages , leading him to become a "monster" and a sinner.During the time the book was written, there was an increase in new inventions. The creature can be seen as a new invention that was too powerful for society to use. If it is too powerful compared to humans, it is not good in their eyes. Anything that makes a person seem inferior is evil or in some way bad in their eyes, furthermore, if anything makes an entire civilization seem inferior, than that

Similar Essays

Is Human Nature Intrinsically Good Or Evil?

1461 words - 6 pages influence on humans starting at a certain age. Ruth Benedict (1934), who played a huge role in the development of cultural anthropology, believed that culture and society is what determined if someone was good or evil. Benedict believes that "the vast proportion of all individuals who are born into any society always and whatever the idiosyncrasies of its institutions, assume, as we have seen, the behaviour dictated by that society" (1934 p. 135

Compare And Contrast Two Ethical Theories.

2167 words - 9 pages In this essay I have chosen to compare two opposing theories, Immanuel Kant's absolutist deontological ethics and Joseph Fletchers relativist situation ethics. The deontological ethics focuses on actions made according to duty and the categorical imperative - which shows how acts are intrinsically good or bad. The situation ethics state that no act is intrinsically good or bad, and that actions should b made according to love. From this

The Impact Of Society Essay

1475 words - 6 pages one another for survival; for that reason language is very important. Moreover, what we learn is from been social creatures. Humans can only make use of their cognition through a social process. As seen in “the wild child” both intrinsically and extrinsically motivations are important in order to accomplish things. Victor is only able to put his clothes on once he is intrinsically motivated to keep himself warm and he is able to learn new words

Maslow: Toward A Psych. Of Being

537 words - 2 pages individual. Maslow points out that this inner nature, our basic emotions and our basic needs are intrinsically 'good' (healthy). Behaviors, which some call 'evil' seem to be "not intrinsic, but rather violent reactions against frustrations of our intrinsic needs, emotions and capacities" (p. 5). Since this inner nature is positive rather than negative, Maslow says it is "best to bring it out and to encourage it, rather than to suppress it" (p. 5).Maslow