Aristotle And Aquinas Essay

2037 words - 8 pages

Aristotle and Aquinas

    Among political theorists, the debate over the rule of law has been quite intense.  From the earliest days of political philosophy through to the enlightenment, there have been varying views on what the rule of law should be.  Two thinkers in particular - Aristotle and St. Thomas Aquinas - are perhaps the most influential.  On the surface, they both advocate the rule of law as playing a crucial role in society.  But upon deeper analysis, one finds that Aristotle's views sharply contrast with those of Aquinas.  This essay shall attempt to elucidate the disagreement between Aristotle and Aquinas, by first outlining Aristotle's arguments for and against the rule of law, and then by explaining what Aristotle would find inadequate with Aquinas' arguments. 


In the third book of Politics (1286a8ff.), Aristotle presents a number of arguments for and against the rule of law.  He begins by posing a question around which his ensuing discussion revolves:


The beginning point of the inquiry if this:  whether it is more advantageous to be ruled by the best man or by the best laws.1


He proceeds to point out that laws only speak of the universal, and that they "do not command a view to circumstance"2  He uses the analogy of an Egyptian doctor to prove his point.  In Egypt, a doctor must follow legal procedure when treating a patient.  It is only after the fourth day that the doctor is legally permitted to use his or her own discretion, and even then, it is at his or her own risk.  Thus, the doctor must follow the prescribed routine (until the fourth day), even if it leads to the death of his patient.  Aristotle uses this example to illustrate that the best regime cannot be one that is based on written rules or laws.  By their very nature, written laws are rigid and inflexible, and cannot tend to the ever-changing needs of the people.  Take, for example, the crime of murder.  How can murder be classified?  No two murders can ever be identical.  Each murderer has his or her own motives.  Some may kill in self-defence, while others may kill as a psychological disorder.  Is it thus fair to judge all murderers as equals?  Of course not.  Accordingly, it would seem that the rule of law is necessarily deficient in some areas.  Yet, Aristotle does not discard the rule of law altogether.  In fact, he supports it by saying that the ruler must himself "necessarily be a legislator, and that laws must exist."3  But what about those things that the law is unable to determine? In these cases, who should wield authority? 


Aristotle presents two arguments which seem to indicate that he supports aristocratic rule.  Firstly, because of their numerical superiority, the multitude are better equipped to judge in areas where the law is deficient.  In his own words, he writes "a crowd can judge many matters better than any single person."4  The logic of this argument is simple:  The multitude has many different...

Find Another Essay On Aristotle and Aquinas

Great Philosophers and Lives Well Lived

1607 words - 6 pages considered to be France. He was a devoted scholar through most of his youth and early adulthood. He became a credentialed Master of Theology (Aquinas). Many of his teachings and writings were built off of and upon the writings of Aristotle. His ways of thinking were deemed to be unique and revolutionary for how they incorporated God and Science. After his death Aquinas was canonized and became Saint Thomas Aquinas. His body was dismembered

Place of Humanity Essay

963 words - 4 pages happiness, according to Aristotle, the soul must have a role in ethics and in the material role of humanity. Aquinas analyzes the importance of a series and how actions produce a product that have an end. If they do not have an end then the products go back to the action that initially started the process. Aquinas believes that all agents or all actions seek to end when they have reached their end, such as a physician will go as far as health. However

Aquinas' view of kingship and the Aristotelian response. Quotes are from "St. Thomas Aquinas on Law and Ethics," ed. Sigmund

705 words - 3 pages St. Thomas Aquinas takes many of Aristotle's ideas from The Politics in order to create his idea of the best regime. He revisits the good and bad forms of each type of government Aristotle introduced, and then makes his decision that the best regime is a type of monarchy that he calls kingship. This decision stems from his definition of a king as "one who rules over the people of a city or province for the common good" (17).Kingship is

Aristotle's life and achievements

940 words - 4 pages . During the 9th century AD, Arab scholars introduced Aristotle, in Arabic translation, to the Islamic world. The 12th century Spanish-Arab philosopher, Averroes, is the best known of the Arab scholars that studied and commented on Aristotle and his works. In the 13th century, the Latin West renewed its interest in Aristotle's work, and Saint Thomas Aquinas found in it a philosophical foundation for Christian thought. Church officials at first

What is Happiness?

1430 words - 6 pages . Profound philosophers, such as Aristotle, Saint Thomas Aquinas, and Kant, have thoroughly speculated happiness and at the end, have ultimately come to various theories, through visions of their own or in conjunction with views that supplement others. Each theory supports its? own definition of happiness. The theories of Aristotle and Saint Thomas Aquinas are partially complimentary; where as Kant?s theory stands in opposition. Aristotle and Aquinas

How did Aquinas resolve the conflict between Aristotelian philosophy and the Christian Doctrine of the beginning of the world?

1809 words - 7 pages In brief Aquinas was able to resolve the conflict between the Aristotelian notion of a world that out of logical necessity has no beginning and the Christian doctrine that God created the world from nothing and as such had a beginning by allowing for the possibility of a created eternal world. Before the above is discussed it is important from the outset to make the distinction between an eternal world and eternity as it applies to God. When we

Aquinas and Edwards

1510 words - 7 pages Aquinas believes that is it reasonable to believe that something that we cannot demonstrate, but not anything only certain things. Aquinas’ arguments rely heavily on Aristotle, and unlike Anselm another philosopher who argued for the existence of God; Aquinas’ arguments are based on experience. Aquinas put together five different ways that are five separate arguments. This essay is going to go in depth about the second way (argument) that is the

aquinas economic thought

1495 words - 6 pages doctrines of Roman Catholicism today. In his writings, Aquinas combined the classical ideas of Aristotle with Christian laws, thereby laying the groundwork for the religiously based medieval thought known as scholasticism. Like Aristotle (see the article in Chapter 5 of the Online Learning Center), he touched on a wide range of subjects, though with the purpose to provide a system of thought that combined the worldly and divine in a seamless unity

Traditional versus Modern Ethics

552 words - 2 pages Well, at any given time there are many different standards of ethics around the world,depending on where you are. The main thing to know is that ethics are winding down,things are getting less ethical, and they are developing into something worse.The early developments in moral and political philosophy left a lasting effect through the history of those. For both moral and political philosophy it is both Plato and Aristotle that have been either

St. Thomas Aquinas: Proving God's Existence

2055 words - 8 pages , presents reasoned argument in favor of faith; within Roman Catholicism it is considered a near sacred text.” (Porter 62) The Summa Contra Gentiles states “Accordingly we must first show that every agent, by its action, intends an end. “ (Pegis 429) Aquinas reaffirms what Aristotle had stated about the beginning of Metaphysic. Aquinas claims, truth is the end or purpose of the universe because the end of the universe is an intellect, and the

The Case Against Monarchy

1759 words - 7 pages Shopping for Electronics, Apparel, Computers, Books, DVDs & More. Web. 15 Feb. 2012. . Miller, Fred, "Aristotle's Political Theory", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), URL = . Thomas, and Paul E. Sigmund. St. Thomas Aquinas on Politics and Ethics

Similar Essays

Locke, Aristotle And Aquinas Essay

2246 words - 9 pages Locke, Aristotle and Aquinas      In the tomes of history, many philosophers have outlined their visions of a perfect society.  Until recently however, few have ventured into the waters of religious tolerance.  One such philosopher was John Locke.  Writing in the late 17th century, Locke advocated a complete separation between church and state.  He argued for an unprecedented tolerance of people of all faiths.   Although Locke's views

        Thomas Aquinas Lived From 1225 To 1274; This Was A

1157 words - 5 pages monastery. Aquinas continued his studies at the University of Naples when the monastery became a battle site. During his studies in Naples, Aquinas was introduced to the Dominican Order. The Dominican Order was a new order that applied the old concepts of Aristotle to modern faith. Over the protests of his family, Aquinas joined the Dominican Order. After joining the order, Aquinas went north to Paris and Cologne to further his studies. Aquinas

Theological Virtue Of Charity Essay

2454 words - 10 pages of Aristotle, whom he thought was the giant of ideas and thoughts during that generation. Another critical source that Aquinas used to be the Summa Contra Gentiles (Thomas & Pegis, 1997). In this source, there were scriptural elements that helped him to bring out is arguments as far as a theological virtue of charity was concerned. It is critical to note that Aquinas used other sources to outline his arguments. There are principles that make moral

St Thomas Aquinas Essay

890 words - 4 pages scholasticism with faith. Therefore, God is the first and final cause according to Aquinas. Aquinas agreed with Augustine and Aristotle to the extent of arguing that man’s happiness does not consist of wealth. Aquinas extends his argument in making the claim that ‘human happiness is not seated in goods of the sensitive faculty, for these goods are not distinct to man and other animals. He argues therefore, that intellect is superior to sense