This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Aristotle And The Book Of Nicomanchean Ethics

1506 words - 6 pages

Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle describes the steps required for humans to obtain happiness. Aristotle states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. He states that a happy person cannot be inactive. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself. The virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. The role of virtue is an important one for Aristotle. Without virtue, it seems one cannot obtain happiness. Virtue acts as a linking factor to happiness.
Aristotle states that the human function is the life activity of the part of the soul that has reason. He extends this further by stating that some sort of activity of the past of the soul that has reason has to be according to virtue. This will create a good man. For Aristotle, in order to be happy, humans must perform their function well in accordance with virtue.
In Book II, Aristotle makes a distinction between two types of virtues; those which are considered ethical and those which are considered intellectual. Ethical virtues deal with actions of courage, generosity, and moderation. Intellectual virtues deal with wisdom and contemplation. Ethical virtues are created through habitual actions. Aristotle says that humans are not born with a natural capacity for virtue. He believes that education and cultivation as youth by one’s parents are pivotal in setting up humans’ ability in making virtuous acts habitual. He feels that humans have to perform virtuous actions as much as possible and through this humans can make a step in becoming virtuous. Aristotle also states that ethical virtues have to be attended by pleasure. He believes that humans cannot be pained when committing a virtuous action. If a human is pained by an action then it is not considered virtuous.
Aristotle goes on to create a distinction between virtuous actions and virtuous character. In a sense, it is a relationship of seeming versus being. Seeming versus being where a virtuous act may seem to be virtuous when it in reality is not. Whereas, a virtuous character actually is virtuous and as a result, actions done by one of virtuous character result in those actions being considered virtuous. An act is not considered virtuous unless it is done by a virtuous person. Aristotle supports this assertion by stating three criteria for an action to be virtuous. First, one has to know the act is virtuous. Second, one has to intend to do it for its own sake. Therefore, one is not expecting anything in return as a result of the action. Thirdly, the action has to be done by one who, when he acts he does so in a certain and firm manner. Aristotle makes the conclusion that most humans do not actually act virtuously. They instead discuss and philosophize about these actions, but do not act on them. This, Aristotle said, is unacceptable because one will not...

Find Another Essay On Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics

Aristotle and Ethics Essay

1742 words - 7 pages 3.0 VIRTUE 3.1 Moral Virtues The term ‘virtue’ is from Latina that meant ‘strength’ or ‘power’. Aristotle’s theory of moral virtue argues that our ultimate goal in life should be happiness. To do so will require our ability to function correctly in our thoughts and actions using our sense of reason and innate understanding of moral virtues (Smith, 2011). Moral virtues are learnt by habit and constant practice (SparkNotes, 2005). Aristotle

"Aristotle on Business Ethics" is a short essay on the ideas of Aristotle and how they may apply to the business ethics which we hold today

1023 words - 4 pages Aristotle on Business EthicsHow much emphasis is placed on morality and ethics when involved in business? Most will answer with the mindset that ethics and morality are essential in business; however do they reflect their answer in their actions? This question of the importance of morality and ethics in business applies to more than just the world's businessmen and women. The minds of millions of people all over can relate to this subject of

Comparative essay describing the ethics of Aristotle, Immanuel Kant, and Emmanuel Levinas

893 words - 4 pages might not like it-- one should act ethically out of the goodness in one's heart. On the other hand, Aristotle believed one should act ethically as part of a community-- based on politics. He also expected a benefit in return, contrary to Kant. Aristotle said that it is ideal to achieve a reasonable means in ethics, and he expected to gain something-- like happiness for instance-- in return. Also, contrary to Aristotle's theory, Kant's theory

Aristotle and Friendship, Philosophical Ethics

609 words - 2 pages live without friends even if the individual had all of the other good things in life. He also describes friendship as a virtue and as just. Given the above statements on friendship, it is safe to say that Aristotle felt that friendship is something that every human must have in order to reach a peaceful state of mind. It has all of the qualities of good as long as both parties of a friendship are considered good. Therefore, the role of friendship

Aristotle - The Nature of Virtue NOTES - Ethics - Assignment

1163 words - 5 pages ARISTOTLE – THE NATURE OF VIRTUE Books I: Happiness Ends and Goods · Every action seems to seek some good. Many actions = many ends. I.e. health is the end of medicine, a boat of boat building, victory of generalship, etc. But, some of these pursuits are subordinate to some one capacity. I.e. bridle making and every other science producing equipment for horses are subordinate to horsemanship. · In all such cases, the ends of the ruling sciences

Aristotle and the Techne of Rhetoric

1433 words - 6 pages endeavors while simultaneously producing much of his philosophical treatises, which focused mainly on logic, metaphysics (which he invented), philosophy of nature, the soul and psychology, and ethics. All of this came to an end however with the sudden death of Alexander in 323 B.C. which instigated the down-fall of the Macedonian government. In order to escape prosecution for his ideas, Aristotle fled the city. Unfortunately he died shortly after of

The Life And Works of Aristotle

2258 words - 9 pages empiricism--the view that knowledge is grounded in sense experience. 'There is nothing in the intellect,' he wrote, 'that was not first in the senses.'EthicsIt seemed to Aristotle that the individual's freedom of choice made an absolutely accurate analysis of human affairs impossible. 'Practical science,' then, such as politics or ethics, was called science only by courtesy and analogy. The inherent limitations on practical science are made

The Biography of Aristotle

3762 words - 15 pages manifesting in nature, and Ethics is the science of Ideas applied to human action. Aristotle's science of sciences was Logic, the science of analysis, the weaknesses of which form the theme of Boris Bogoslovsky's book, The Technique of Controversy.Plato divided knowledge into two classes, the one dealing with the noumenal, the other with the phenomenal world. The first he called real knowledge, the second, opinion. In this statement we find a clear

The Views Of Reality Of Plato and Aristotle

1015 words - 4 pages The Views of Reality of Aristotle and PlatoIntroductionThe purpose of this essay is to compare and contrast the views of reality of both Aristotle and Plato. Plato and Aristotle, two of some of the greatest philosophers of Ancient Greece, were connected in studies. Plato was taught by Socrates, then Aristotle studied at Plato's Academy. Plato was the first of the two to study, and Aristotle then studied there. And, upon learning this, one would


1803 words - 7 pages Plato and Aristotle are undoubtedly the greatest of philosophers that the world has seen. Both Plato and Aristotle formed unique and distinct theories about the Greek city states. While most people believe that Plato and Aristotle are complete opposites of one another, it is not completely true. For those who have studied the works of both the philosophers, the theory proposed by Aristotle is just a development of the Platonic system because

Aristotle on the Nature of Happiness and Virtue

1643 words - 7 pages Maybe it’s not clear for many people but, for me it is. Happiness does not depend on what we have; happiness comes from us our soul. Aristotle enshrines happiness as a central purpose of human life and a goal in itself. Virtue, which Aristotle believes that is the balance between two excesses, and definitely achieved by maintaining the mean. Aristotle always asks what the ultimate purpose of human existence is. Everywhere we see

Similar Essays

Aristotle And The Book Of Nicomanchean Ethics

950 words - 4 pages Florida International University Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics Haley Beahn (2697300) PHI 2600 Professor Henry Maklakiewicz 16 April 2014 Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then

Aristotle And The Book Of Nicomanchean Ethics

2543 words - 11 pages Aristotle and the Book of Nicomanchean Ethics In Book I of Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle states that the ultimate human goal or end is happiness. Aristotle then describes steps required for humans to obtain the ultimate happiness. He also states that activity is an important requirement of happiness. A virtuous person takes pleasure in doing virtuous things. He then goes on to say that living a life of virtue is something pleasurable in itself

Book Vii Of The Nichomachean Ethics By Aristotle

3234 words - 13 pages Book VII of the Nichomachean Ethics by Aristotle Introduction In book seven of the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle sets out his theory of akrasia, or weakness of will. Aristotle attempts to explain both how such actions are possible (contra Socrates), and how we can dissolve the puzzles (aporiai) generated by our most important (kurios) commonly held beliefs, which arise in response to the actions of the incontinent person. This paper

Examining The Ethics Of Plato And Aristotle

1051 words - 4 pages This essay will be examining the ethics of Plato (428-347 BCE) and Aristotle (384-322 B.C). I will firstly attempt to summarise the five fundamental concepts of Plato and Aristotle before providing my own opinion and view on their ethics. I will concentrate on their theories on the good life as a life of justice, censorship, knowledge and the good life. I will first examine Plato’s ethics. Plato was a philosopher who was both a rationalist